Med Sci Educ. 2020 Sep; 30(3): 1107–1121. The hidden curriculum within medical education has been a topic of recent debate. Consensus opinion regarding the continued relevance of this term, what constitutes the hidden curriculum, and the nature of its impact do not exist. Further research is required to contribute to this debate. This work sets out
to investigate which factors beyond taught cognitive knowledge influence medical students in clinical and educational environments and examine how this occurs. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 39 students from one UK medical school. Fourteen faculty were interviewed individually to triangulate data. Data were analysed using constructivist thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory convention. The presence of the hidden curriculum was clearly demonstrated, acting
through role modelling, organizational culture, stereotyping and professional dress. Mentioned frequently were the influences of the hidden curriculum on student professionalism and identity development. Professionalism was perceived as being negatively impacted by the hidden curriculum and seen as an imposition from senior faculty to control students. Students believe medical identity formation begins prior to medical school, in a process known as “anticipatory socialization”, a previously
unstudied identity transition. Students felt covert institutional agendas negatively impacted their identity, pushing them further from the identity their institution was encouraging them to acquire. Key messages for educators include the need to explore the hidden curriculum through discussion with students. Improving transparency of organizational culture may allow students to interpret institutional agendas in the way institutions formally intend, reducing orthogonal interpretations of
organizational culture and subsequent impact upon identity formation. Keywords: Hidden curriculum, Professionalism, Professional identity, Medical students, Anticipatory socialization Medical school is designed to equip students with the knowledge and skills required to become a doctor. Whilst some sources, such as medical school and national guidance
[1], do aim to increase student awareness regarding what is expected of them upon graduation, guidance on the reality of becoming a doctor is often lacking. The practicalities of life as a clinician are typically observed and learnt through experience in the clinical world of medicine—this informal, and often unintended, learning is often termed the hidden curriculum
[2]. The hidden curriculum “deals with the tacit ways in which knowledge and behaviour are constructed”, operating outwith of a medical school’s specified formal curriculum [2]. It consists of a set of influences acting upon students as a result of their presence within a specific
organization [3]. These multifaceted influences operate within a student’s social environment and include “corridor conversations”, role modelling behaviour and assessment regimes [4].There is contemporary debate surrounding the definition of the hidden curriculum, with some viewing
the term as the unwanted aspects of becoming a doctor [5] and others asserting the hidden curriculum includes positive interactions [6] and can offer benefits to both students and faculty. For the purpose of this research, the definition of the hidden curriculum will be taken as it
has been described at the start of this paragraph. This definition is without positive or negative connotations, in order to ensure findings are grounded in participant experience. Debate also exists as to the continued relevance of the concept of a “hidden curriculum”. Although the concept has become commonplace in educational discourse, views exist such as those voiced by Macleod, that the term has become problematic
[7]. The term “hidden curriculum” is broad in definition, including varying “depths of hiddenness” [7], which may prevent clear academic discourse
[8]. Hafferty and Martimianakis argue against this view, putting forth the breadth of the term allows for conceptual richness and theoretical diversity in investigation of this complex concept, which cannot be reduced to a singular understanding [9]. Despite
this, they acknowledge the need for clarity regarding which elements of the hidden curriculum are to be examined. This will be actively considered in the research questions of this work. The influences operating within the hidden curriculum are held to impact students in several different ways. Focus has largely been given to the negative impact of the hidden curriculum upon medical students. These impacts include the socialization of medical students to manifest less
professional or moral behaviours [10–12] and damaging effects upon the professional identity formation of medical students leading to emotional dissonance
[13]. Much less research has been done concerning the potential positive impacts of the hidden curriculum upon medical undergraduate students. Some work casts doubt upon findings that the hidden curriculum serves as a purely negative influence on student professionalism and identity formation
[14] and demonstrates benefits. These benefits include student internalization of robust medical ethics as a professional value [15]—indeed, recent research reveals some faculty attempt to deliberately manipulate the hidden curriculum to teach concepts such
as professionalism “by stealth” [16]. Further to this, some hold a positive hidden curriculum surrounding professional identity formation may be fostered if the complexities of clinical practice are made explicit [17]. Given ongoing debate, additional work aiming to highlight
the factors, and nature of these factors, beyond taught cognitive knowledge that impact medical students is appropriate to contribute to generating an academic consensus. Given this, and the fact that most research evaluating the impact of the hidden curriculum has been done from the view of medical educators [18,
19], further investigation of the hidden curriculum’s impact upon and with medical undergraduate students is essential. This work explores factors contributing to or forming the hidden curriculum within one UK medical school from the perspective of medical students. It questions the nature of the hidden curriculum’s impact and details the mechanism by which this impact occurs.
Ascertaining this impact could prove difficult—indeed, by its very name, this type of curriculum is “hidden” and therefore not easily evaluated [20]. In order to determine the impact of the hidden curriculum upon medical students, focus group data were also triangulated with individual faculty interviews, to deepen data analysis. The paradigm of this work is constructivism, a world-view recognizing that reality is multiple in nature and socially constructed by individuals [21]. Constructivism is a way of approaching research that acknowledges the subjectivity of reality and knowledge
[21]. This understanding influences the research approach selected and informs interpretation of participant data. Given that students experience the hidden curriculum subjectively as a social process [3], constructivism is an appropriate paradigm to direct
and guide this work. The qualitative methodology selected for use within our paradigm is constructivist thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory convention and acknowledging the active role of the researcher (and subsequent subjectivity) in data generation and analysis
[22–25]. This work has three central research questions, outlined below. The first question is intentionally broad, in order to embrace the acknowledged breadth of the concept of
the hidden curriculum. The research team hoped this question would facilitate investigation of both the hidden curriculum within student clinical experiences and regarding educational experiences. In this way, we define the scope of our research regarding the hidden curriculum by stipulating which contexts within medical education will be examined. This aligns with Macleod’s adaptations of Vallance’s three dimensions of critical thinking regarding the hidden curriculum. We expand upon this
specificity in our secondary research question, investigating student definition of the term “hidden curriculum” and their application of this term to their own experience. The third research of this work centres around perceptions regarding whether the hidden curriculum can be taught and assessed, given contemporary debate regarding whether the hidden curriculum can be made visible. What factors beyond the formal curriculum (e.g. including taught cognitive knowledge) impact on
medical students within clinical and educational settings? What does the term “hidden curriculum” mean to medical students? How do they apply this definition to their own experiences to identify factors that have influenced their practice, attitudes, knowledge and behaviour (i.e. learning)? How do students and tutors conceptualize the relationship between teaching, assessment and the hidden curriculum? Study Design and Data CollectionEthical approval was granted by the Hull York Medical School (HYMS) Ethics Committee. Semi-structured focus group interviews with 39 medical students were undertaken by two authors (OC and AH) within HYMS. HYMS runs a five-year undergraduate medical programme, with an option for interested students to undertake a year of intercalated study following second or third year. Each focus group contained 4 or 5 students. In addition, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 14 active medical school faculty, as a way of triangulating student data. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim by the research team. Students were recruited from all years of the undergraduate MBBS course and, through the utilization of theoretical sampling, equitable distribution of students from all years of the course was achieved. Theoretical sampling was used in this research with the hope of gaining a more nuanced understanding of the hidden curriculum through participant experience and representative of the wider student and tutor body [26]. Participation in this research was voluntary. Recruitment of students occurred electronically via email and posts within Blackboard, the Digital Learning Environment used by medical students. Recruitment of staff occurred electronically via email and through the use of snowball recruitment. In order to generate meaningful results, inclusion criteria were set for staff requiring them to be involved in the teaching of students at least once a month. Interested students and staff responded to the advertised research via email and were subsequently sent the study participant information sheet. After an appropriate amount of time had lapsed to read the information sheet, interested parties were emailed the study consent form. Prior to study commencement, all researchers engaged in individual reflection and subsequent group discussion concerning reflexivity to consider their own perspectives in more detail. Two authors are medical education researchers (GMF and MELB); one is a medical student (AH), and one author, although now a junior doctor, was a medical student at the time of the research (OC). Both the semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews were conducted iteratively. Group semi-structured interviews allowed us to understand a range of individual views concerning the hidden curriculum and explore contrasting student opinion [27, 28]. A focus group topic guide was produced by the researchers, derived from previously published studies regarding the hidden curriculum and allowing for a semi-structured approach. The focus group topic guide detailing the spines used to facilitate discussion can be seen in Table 2, in the appendix to this work. Medical school tutors were offered individual semi-structured interviews, instead of group interviews in order to increase participation [19, 29]. At HYMS, tutors are also practicing clinicians and so often have fixed clinical commitments that scheduling group interviews around is difficult. Given this, tutors were offered individual interviews to allow them to practically participate. For tutor interviews, interviewers were provided with an interview guide, containing open question stems to stimulate discussion and encourage a conversational interview style [28]. The interview guide for tutors is presented in Table 3, Appendix section. Table 2Semi-structured focus group interview topic guide
Table 3Faculty individual semi-structured interview guide
Data AnalysisOpen, focused and theoretical coding of interview and focus group transcripts were carried out by all members of the research team in order to deepen analysis. Coding was done in iterative cycles with constant comparison. Following initial open coding, the research team met to discuss content groups and resolve any disagreements regarding groupings. Memo-writing was utilized throughout by each researcher. Comparison of memos assisted in content grouping. Focused coding and theoretical coding were used to generate a rich thematic picture detailing factors within the hidden curriculum impacting upon students, alongside the nature and mechanism of these impacts. Concurrent with open coding, the research team met regularly to discuss the informational power of this research with final student and tutor participant figures being decided upon as sufficient to produce transferable results [21]. ResultsThemesOne hundred ninety-nine descriptive open codes were initially identified from all interview transcripts. These were collapsed into 65 final open codes. Student and tutor transcripts were coded iteratively and together to provide a more in-depth analysis. Ten sub-themes and three major themes were identified. These are detailed in Table 1, below. Table 1Open codes, sub-themes and major themes. Major themes are listed at the top of the table, with the sub-themes of each major theme listed vertically underneath. Underneath each sub-theme is a list of open codes that generated the sub-theme
Major Theme 1: ProfessionalismWhat Is Professionalism?Both students and tutors spoke about defining professionalism within the hidden curriculum. For students, professionalism was viewed in a largely negative light.
Tutors acknowledged students acquired professionalism gradually within the hidden curriculum, as their awareness of the hidden curriculum increased.
Acquiring Professional AttributesDiscussing professionalism and the hidden curriculum involved participants detailing the acquisition of professional attributes. There was debate regarding what professional attributes are. Tutors recognized respect for patients as key.
Although students acknowledged the importance of respecting patients, they tended to focus more upon the modification of behaviour to portray professional attributes, in opposition to the importance of attributes in and of themselves. Professional dress was identified as important and students lamented the loss of white coats. Students believed white coats portrayed professionalism and strengthened medical professional identity.
There was debate as to whether professionalism could be taught within the formal curriculum, with it thought to be most useful in early formal instruction.
It was recognized professionalism acquisition occurs largely within the hidden curriculum with students learning from experience and tutor behaviour.
Major Theme 2: Professional Identity FormationBoth students and tutors spoke about professional identity formation occurring underneath the umbrella of the hidden curriculum. Personal IdentityStudents and tutors described how personal identity is impacted by the acquisition of medical professional identity.
Students experienced conflict between their personal identities and emerging professional identity. This often led to a shift within student personal identity and behavioural changes facilitating acceptance within the medical field. This conflict was not witnessed within tutors, suggesting seniority and time spent within the hidden curriculum may resolve conflict.
What Is Professional Identity?Defining professional identity was described when discussing the impact of the hidden curriculum. Medical identity was perceived as “special”, affording doctors respect.
Professional identity was identified as being influenced by the hidden curriculum.
There was debate over the timeline for the formation of medical student professional identity. Tutors believed professional identity formation could only occur when practicing as a doctor, fully immersed within the hidden curriculum of the workplace.
However, most students believed their medical professional identity began to form prior to medical school admission, when they decided to become medical applicants. Early identity changes were most likely to take the form of altering behaviour to adopt medical professional attributes, such as moderating social media usage.
Students also recognized the presence of professional identity transitions within the hidden curriculum. The identity transition most frequently commented upon was that that occurs upon the commencement of clinical exposure.
Help and the Hidden CurriculumIt is clear from the above that clinical exposure aids medical identity acquisition. Dissecting this, involvement within a medical community of practice strengthens identity formation and assists learning. Junior doctors were valued the most as having recent hidden curriculum knowledge.
Students recognized not just positive experiences within the hidden curriculum could assist in identity acquisition but, given appropriate interpretation of the hidden curriculum, negative experiences could also benefit.
However, interpretation of any negative hidden curricula experiences can differ between individuals and instruction in reflective practice is key to facilitate appropriate interpretation.
Harm and the Hidden CurriculumAlthough negative experiences within the hidden curriculum can be useful, they also have the potential to harm student identity formation. Medical students acknowledged medical admission processes could unify student identity and reduce personality variety.
No views were expressed as to whether students thought selection unification would have positive or negative implications upon identity formation, although students did recognize that institutions pushing specific professional identities upon students later in their training, often as a result of wider institutional agendas, pushed them further from the acquisition of that identity.
Negative role modelling and institutions failing to manage this was identified by tutors as an element of the hidden curriculum particularly harmful to identity formation.
Students generally thought themselves able to counteract negative role modelling, although some acknowledged not everyone may be able to mitigate negative effects upon behaviour and identity.
Stereotyping by others was identified by students as prevalent and harmful.
The harmful effects of the hidden curriculum caused negative identity dissonance within students. Students spoke about identity dissonance without awareness of the phenomenon, often illustrating a clear divide between their personal and professional selves through the use of clothing to symbolize switching between poorly integrated identities. Here medical professional identity is something to be worn, that they do not yet possess in their own right.
Major Theme 3: Attempting to Illuminate the Hidden CurriculumStudents and tutors identified several ways in which they attempted to illuminate or uncover the hidden curriculum. Awareness and Knowledge of ImpactIncreasing both student and tutor awareness of the hidden curriculum was identified as crucial in tackling the issues it could pose.
Pre-clinical students had a particularly poor understanding of what the hidden curriculum was.
Clinical students displayed more meaningful views of the hidden curriculum.
One explanation for this is that the hidden curriculum has a larger impact upon, and relevance for, senior students. This impact is heightened by the prospect of practicing as a junior doctor.
Senior students identified the hidden curriculum as having as least as large an impact as the formal curriculum. Awareness of its impact and benefits made students more likely to try and uncover the hidden curriculum themselves.
However, students also expressed concern at uncovering clinical aspects of the hidden curriculum, due to the need for the previously mentioned individual interpretation of its impact.
TeachingWe have already unearthed debate surrounding professionalism teaching. Debate is also seen more generally as to whether the hidden curriculum can be taught. Most individuals thought the hidden curriculum could not be taught and believed knowledge and skills forged within this were acquired through experience.
Students expressed a preference for baseline knowledge to be built on didactic teaching and then solidified by experience within the hidden curriculum. Tutors also expressed preferences for an integrated approach, combining formal, informal and hidden curricula.
Students referenced a well-developed oral culture surrounding educational hidden curricula that acted as a form of teaching or instruction.
However, there was concern regarding this oral culture—some students felt unable to trust unstandardized information, and some saw it as representing a deficiency within the formal curricula of the medical school.
Role ModellingRole modelling was frequently detailed as a key element of the hidden curriculum. There is significant interplay between role modelling and “teaching” of the hidden curriculum, given that so much of instruction within the hidden curriculum takes place within a clinical environment. In this way, students recognize role modelling as having a positive impact on their learning experience.
Given the impact of role modelling, negative role modelling can prove harmful. We have already demonstrated negative role modelling within the hidden curriculum can prove harmful to student identity acquisition. Building upon the development of this identity, negative role modelling experiences can influence student speciality choice.
As well as role modelling impacting upon experience within the hidden curriculum, role models can act directly to help students illuminate the hidden curriculum. Some tutors suggested this is achieved through explicitly addressing the hidden curriculum and encouraging students to reflect upon its impact.
AssessmentThere is debate as to whether we should formally assess the hidden curriculum within medicine and, if we should, how this could happen. Students voiced concerns over attempting to assess the hidden curriculum as there is little parity between experiences within the hidden curriculum.
Both students and tutors recognized that examinations influence student behaviour which may impact upon learning.
Students and tutors both identified the hidden curriculum surrounding institutional examinations which, if not explicitly addressed prior to assessment, causes difficulty and distress.
Students felt assessments were not well aligned with actual clinical practice. This lack of alignment contributed to uncertainty surrounding clinical examinations and acted as a source of the hidden curriculum.
DiscussionKey MessagesMedical student and tutor views reveal much about the impact of the hidden curriculum. The findings of the work revolve largely around student professionalism and identity formation. Yet, how do these findings fit with what is already known? Students and tutors acknowledge that the development of professionalism within the hidden curriculum can detract from medical student identity. Professionalism was viewed negatively; many believe adopting medical professionalism involves erasing one’s own identity, which coincides with Erikson’s belief that the suppression of one’s personal identity is necessary to affect identity change [30]. Given this, discomfort in adopting professional attributes here could represent a normal part of incorporating medical professional attributes into one’s professional identity. However, a greater depth of evidence has emerged demonstrating identity suppression can cause identity dissonance and significant emotional distress [5]. Concerns also exist that a hidden curriculum encouraging the adoption of professional attributes which are defined in a “top-down” fashion restricts students [31] and risks propagating discrimination. The concept of medical professionalism is seen as upholding the views of the most powerful within the field—typically white men—and diverse students are discouraged from freely expressing identities that authority figures view as “non-traditional” [32]. Our work adds weight to these emerging claims—medical students find the hidden curriculum defines professionalism in a heavily boundaried, “top-down” fashion and this negatively impacts upon their sense of self and subsequent behaviours, where they feel they need to become overly restrictive. The definition of professionalism within the hidden curriculum needs addressing—without explicit evidence of institutional work to address student concerns, professionalism risks being viewed by students as “something used more to control… behaviour than to stand as a core occupational value” [33]. During medical school, students progress through a series of identity transitions [34]; however, what is less well discussed, and a principal finding of this work, is the notion that medical professional identity formation begins prior to admission to medical school. Students overwhelmingly believed their medical identity and conscious alterations to their behaviour occurred as soon as they decided to become medical school applicants. It could, therefore, be hypothesized that the hidden curriculum may be acting even prior to entering medical school. Within wider occupational literature, a concept known as “anticipatory socialization” exists, where preconceived notions of a profession can have profound effects on later values and behaviour [35]. Cavanagh et al. demonstrated medical students understand the expectations of their profession more so than students on other university courses, with this understanding likely developing prior to course commencement [35]. Therefore, medical students are likely to be affected by anticipatory socialization more than other developing professionals. Despite this, very little research concerning anticipatory socialization’s impact upon medical identity formation exists [36, 37]. This work adds weight to previously tentative claims that medical students undergo a period of anticipatory socialization prior to university entry, in which medical professional identity begins to form. The hidden curriculum of medicine begins to act within this period, shaping students before they even set foot within a medical school. What this hidden curriculum entails is likely different for each student, as they hold diverse experiences and views of the medical profession before they enter into a medical institution with a more standardized curriculum and, therefore, arguably more predictable hidden curriculum. Although entry to medical school undoubtedly represents a professional identity transition, students do not approach this transition as a blank professional canvas—indeed, deciding to apply to medical school may represent a previously unidentified, additional identity transition. It is well held that positive student experiences within the clinical environment act as a hidden curriculum in assisting with professional identity formation [38–40]. What has not been well established, however, is that benefits can be offered through negative student experiences within the hidden curriculum. The hidden curriculum operates within the real world of medical practice; it is not a simulated environment and is, therefore, impossible to fully control. Given this, students are liable to encounter negative experiences during immersion within the hidden curriculum. Students within our study felt such negative experiences strengthened their desire to do better and improve their own behaviour, given appropriate reflection upon said experiences. An important distinction must be drawn here, however—student mistreatment within the hidden curriculum has been proven to damage student learning [41] and this is not what our findings advocate. Medical education literature has previously demonstrated the damaging effects of negative role modelling [31, 42, 43], and that reflection upon such experiences can negate any lasting damage to student learning, professionalism or identity formation [44]. Previous work has made tentative claims that reflection upon negative experiences in “sense-making” activities could assist students in embodying medical professional identity [43, 45]. Despite this, the focus of the majority of the work done in this area involves avoiding any negative impacts upon identity through reflection [46]. This work goes further, more thoroughly demonstrating that appropriate student reflection upon negative experiences within the hidden curriculum can not only negate negative impacts upon learning but also can impart positives. One could even class negative experiences as a “complexity” of clinical practice that Wald et al. acknowledge require making explicit to create a positive hidden curriculum assisting in identity formation [17]. Undoubtedly, we should train clinicians to increase awareness of the impact of role modelling and support them in developing as purveyors of positive experiences for our students. Yet, even with such training, we have limited power to control the reality of our fraught medical system and cannot, indeed perhaps should not, shelter our students from the reality of medicine. This work offers a new view—a more pragmatic approach needs to be adopted, with institutions improving student awareness of negative role modelling and arming students with the appropriate reflective tools to interpret the negatives of the hidden curriculum in a constructive and beneficial fashion. Negative effects of the hidden curriculum have been well researched—so much so that some scholars believe the hidden curriculum represents only the unwanted aspects of becoming a doctor [5]. This work echoes previous findings that the hidden curriculum of clinical experiences can act to negatively impact a student’s future speciality choice, as well as damaging learning through negative role modelling and student mistreatment [46, 47]. A more novel finding of this work, however, concerns the damaging hidden curriculum of institutional agendas and organizational culture, often driven by recruitment pressure, upon student identity formation. Students recognized that institutions trying to encourage specific professional identities to assist local recruitment (e.g. through increased exposure to primary care) pushed them further from the acquisition of that identity. Institutional efforts to improve recruitment and retention to traditionally low recruitment specialties seem to be operating in a counterproductive fashion. It is acknowledged one’s identity is influenced by socio-cultural factors and is institutionally situated [48, 49]. Given this, one can logically assume an institution’s agenda will impact upon student identity acquisition. Some view such identity regulation of practitioners by institutions within adjacent fields as a form of organizational control [50, 51]. Concerningly, our students voice experiencing such organizational pressure to conform—institutions must re-evaluate their approach to agenda application, particularly in regard to recruitment and retention initiatives, to ensure their strategy is not acting counterproductively. Lack of institutional transparency regarding higher agendas is seen as hierarchical and as a barrier to professional development within adjacent occupational fields [50]. Improving the transparency of medical school agendas may allow students to interpret any perceived institutional pressures and prevent the alienation of many students. The participants of this work voiced a desire for the hidden curriculum to be illuminated and assessed to produce better prepared medical graduates, although there was debate over whether this could be achieved. Several scholars have suggested that the vast majority of medical knowledge is tacit, and that the knowledge acquired within the hidden curriculum is no exception [6, 52]. Polyanyi describes tacit knowledge as information one knows but cannot tell [45], with it being impossible for all tacit knowledge to be brought to light [48, 52]. Given this, it would be impossible to fully illuminate and examine all components of the hidden curriculum, although a desire for this was expressed. Educators must make tough decisions regarding the hierarchy of tacit knowledge and decide just what needs to be made explicit in order to aid student identity formation and professional development. The impossibility of highlighting all priority areas of tacit knowledge should also be acknowledged with students, and continual feedback sought regarding the relevance and appropriateness of faculty identified tacit knowledge priorities. This process is currently insufficient and has allowed a divide to develop between final medical school exams and practice as a junior doctor [53]. This work attributes this divide to a failure to prioritize and illuminate tacit knowledge within the hidden curriculum. Further work is needed utilizing both student and educator opinion to develop a priority list of tacit medical knowledge normally imparted by the hidden curriculum that would most benefit from being directly illuminated through teaching and assessment. LimitationsOne limitation of this study is that it examined the hidden curriculum of a single institution, potentially limiting result transferability. Despite this, we feel our results are transferable to medical students within other institutions nationally and internationally—our sample size is intentionally large and we utilized theoretical sampling to improve informational power. The findings and key messages of this work are relevant to any educator interested in the impact of their institution’s hidden curriculum upon their students, and what they can do to help maximize student benefit. The composition of the group interviews may also limit this work. Students were assigned to different groups to ensure an adequate mixture and representation of students from different years of the MBBS course, in the hope that this would generate a richer discussion regarding a variety of experiences. However, this method does run the risk of paying inadequate heed to the importance of student identity transitions. Stephens et al. acknowledge three key transitional time periods of medical student identity [34]. The first transition occurs upon entry into medical school, the second upon transition to a clinical clerkship, and the third just prior to graduation. Had the volunteering medical students been grouped so they were in groups with others at the same transitional stage as they were, this may have allowed for a more thorough exploration of these transitions, and the impact of the hidden curriculum at each time point. There is scope for further research investigating the impact of the hidden curriculum upon student identity and professionalism at identity thresholds witnessed within medical students. ConclusionsThis qualitative study demonstrates that the impact of the hidden curriculum upon medical student professionalism and identity formation is not straightforward. Professionalism was viewed as being mostly negatively impacted by the hidden curriculum, due to erosion of individual identity. Stemming from a lack of clarity and student input in its definition, professionalism was seen as an imposition from senior faculty, used to control students. The impact of the hidden curriculum upon identity formation was more positive, with negative clinical experiences even holding the power to strengthen identity, given appropriate reflection. Students felt covert institutional agendas negatively impacted their emerging identity, pushing them further from the identity their institution was encouraging them to acquire. Students believe medical professional identity formation begins prior to entry to medical school, once they decide to apply, in a process known as “anticipatory socialization”. This likely represents a previously unstudied identity transition and expansion of medical school hidden curricula. Whilst it is difficult to fully confront or illuminate the hidden curriculum, it is clear current efforts are insufficient, with students perceiving dissonance between their final exams and practice as a junior doctor. Key messages for educators include the need to reveal priority areas of the hidden curriculum through open discussion with students, as well as providing students with the skills to recognize and reflect upon areas of the hidden curriculum they encounter. This work could act as a springboard for discussion with students, as knowledge of where benefit and harm lie within the hidden curriculum is the first step in being able to practically confront it. Educators must make tough decisions regarding which areas of the hidden curriculum are a priority to highlight to students. One key priority area is improving the transparency of institutional agendas, allowing students to interpret institutional pressures and ameliorate negative effects upon the formation of their identity. Overall, the hidden curriculum cannot be avoided. It is a complex concept that is always at work instructing medical students in one way or another. Although it is difficult, perhaps impossible, to uncover every nuance of the concept, we have a duty as medical educators to confront potentially damaging aspects of the hidden curriculum that have become more visible through research, as outlined above. Areas identified by this study warranting further research include further research concerning the impact of the hidden curriculum upon established medical school identity transitions, and further study regarding the anticipatory socialization of medical school applications with the applicants themselves. AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank Professor Fred Hafferty for his thoughtful comments on the draft title and abstract of this work. AppendixAuthors ContributionsAll authors contributed significantly to the design, data collection and analysis of this work. All authors were involved in the drafting and the critical revision of the entire paper, approving the final manuscript for publication, and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Compliance with Ethical StandardsConflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval Ethical approval was sought and approved by the Hull York Medical School institutional ethics board. Informed Consent Written, informed consent was sought from all participants prior to interview.
FootnotesPublisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. References1. General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates. ; 2018. 2. Mclaren P. Life in schools: an introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. In DeVitis JL, editor. American Educational Classics: 1964–2015.: Peter Lang; 1989. p. 183–184. 3. Hafferty F. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403–407. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 4. Chan L, Pawlina W, editors. Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. [Google Scholar] 5. Monrouxe L. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44(1):40–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03440.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 6. Hafferty F, Finn G. The hidden curriculum and anatomy education. In Chan L, Pawlina W, editors. Teaching anatomy: a practical guide.: Springer; 2015. p. 339–349. 7. Macleod A. The hidden curriculum: Is it time to re-consider the concept? Medical teacher. 2. 2014 Jun; 36(6): p. 539–540. [PubMed] 8. Lawrence C, Mhlaba T, Stewart K, Moletsane R, Gaede B, Moshabela M. The hidden curricula of medical education: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2018;93(4):648–656. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 9. Hafferty F, Martimianakis M. A rose by other names: some general musings on Lawrence and colleagues’ hidden curriculum scoping review. Acad Med. 2018;93(4):526–531. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002025. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 10. Hopkins L, Saciragic L, Kim J, Posner G. The hidden curriculum: exposing the unintended lessons of medical education. Cureus. 2016;8(10):e845. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11. Newton B, Barber L, Clardy J, Cleveland E, O’Sullivan P. Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Acad Med. 2008;83:244–249. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637837. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 12. Doja A, Bould M, Clarkin C, Eady K, Sutherland S, Writer H. The hidden and informal curriculum across the continuum of training: a cross-sectional qualitative study. Med Teach. 2016;38:410–418. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1073241. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 13. Silveira G, Campos L, Schweller M, Turato E, Helmich E, de Carvalho-Filho M. “Speed up”! The influences of the hidden curriculum on the professional identity development of medical students. Health Professions Education. 2018. 14. Joynt G, Wong W, Ling L, Lee A. Medical students and professionalism- do the hidden curriculum and current role models fail our future doctors? Med Teach. 2018;40(4):395–399. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408897. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 15. Lynoe N, Lofmark R, Thulesius H. Teaching medical ethics: what is the impact of role models? Some experiences from Swedish medical schools. J Med Ethics. 2007;34(4):315–316. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021147. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 16. Aka JJ, Cook NE, Hafferty FH, Finn GM. Teaching by stealth: utilising the hidden curriculum through body painting within anatomy education. Eur J Anat. 2018;22(2):173–182. [Google Scholar] 17. Wald H, White J, Reis S, Esquibel A, Anthony D. Grappling with complexity: medical students’ reflective writings about challenging patient encounters as a window into professional identity formation. Med Teach. 2019;41(2):152–160. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1475727. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 18. Ozolins I, Hall H, Peterson R. The student voice: recognising the hidden and informal curriculum in medicine. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):606–611. doi: 10.1080/01421590801949933. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 19. Bandini J, Mitchell C, Epstein-Peterson Z, Amobi A, Cahill J, Peteet J, et al. Student and faculty reflections of the hidden curriculum: how does the hidden curriculum shape students’ medical training and professionalization? American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2017;34(1):57–63. doi: 10.1177/1049909115616359. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 20. MacLeod A. The hidden curriculum: is it time to reconsider the concept? Med Teach. 2014;36(6):539–540. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907876. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 21. Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe L, O’Brien B, Rees C. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51:40–50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 22. Epstein R, Cole D, Gawinski B, Piotrowski-Lee S, Ruddy N. How students learn from community-based preceptors. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:149–154. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.2.149. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 23. Erikson E. Identity: youth and crisis.: WW Norton & Company; 1994. 24. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 1. Chicago: Aldine Transaction; 2000. [Google Scholar] 25. Finn G, Garner J, Sawdon M. ‘You’re judged all the time!’ Student views on professionalism: a multicentre study. Med Educ. 2010;44:814–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03743.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 26. Coyne I. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs. 1997;26(3):623–630. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 27. Stalmeijer R, McNaughton N, Van Mook W. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–939. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 28. Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Chapter 6: ‘In-depth Interviews’ of qualitative research methods. In Qualitative research methods. London: SAGE; 2011. 29. Redman M, Pearce J, Gajebasia S, Johnson M, Finn G. Care of the dying: a qualitative exploration of foundation year doctors’ experiences. Med Educ. 2017;51(10):1025–1036. doi: 10.1111/medu.13358. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 30. Phillips S, Clarke M. More than an education: the hidden curriculum, professional attitudes and career choice. Med Educ. 2012;46(9):887–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04316.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 31. Lee J. The weaponization of medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2017;92(5):579–580. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001647. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 32. Mullikin T, Shahi v, Grbic D, Pawlina W, Hafferty F. First year medical student peer nominations of professionalism: a methodological detective story about making sense of non-sense. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 12(1): p. 20–31. [PubMed] 33. Higgs J, Edwards H, editors. Educating beginning practitioners: challenges for health professional education: Butterwork Heinemann; 1999. 34. Alvesson M. Knowledge work: ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations. 2001;54(7):863–886. doi: 10.1177/0018726701547004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 35. Cavanagh P, Dewberry C, Jones P. Becoming professional: when and how does it start? A comparative study of first-year medical and law students in the UK. Med Educ. 2000;34:897–902. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00680.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 36. Lamdin R. The professional socialisation of medical students New Zealand: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2010. 37. Burford B. Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):143–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04099.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 38. Monrouxe L. Identities, self and medical education. In Walsh K, editor. Oxford textbook of medical education.: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 113–123. 39. Watson D, Slade S, Buske L, Tepper J. Intergenerational differences in workloads among primary care physicians: a ten year, population-based study. Health Aff. 2006;25(6):1620–1628. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1620. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 40. Gan R, Snell L. When the learning environment is suboptimal: exploring medical students’ perceptions of “mistreatment” Acad Med. 2014;89(4):608–617. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 41. Cruess R, Cruess S, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism: supporting the development of a professional identity.: Cambridge University Press; 2016. 42. Passi V, Johnson S, Peile E, Wright S, Hafferty F, Johnson N. Doctor role modelling in medical education: BEME Guide No.27. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1422–e1436. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.806982. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 43. Kenny N, Mann K, MacLeod H. Role modeling in physicians’ professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med. 2003;78(12):1203–1210. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200312000-00002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 44. Ajaz A, David R, Brown D, Smuk M, Korszun A. BASH: badmouthing, attitudes and stigmatisation in healthcare as experienced by medical students. BJPsych Bulletin. 2016;40(2):97–102. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.053140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 45. Mann K, Dornan T, Teunissen P. Perspectives on learning. In Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, editors. Medical education. Theory and practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. 46. Polanyi M. Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. First Edition, Enlarged ed. edition ed.: University of Chicago Press; 2015. 47. Kumar K, Roberts C, Thistlewaite J. Entering and navigating academic medicine: academic clinician-educators’ experiences. Med Educ. 2011;45(5):497–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03887.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 48. Monrouxe L, Grundy L, Mann M, John Z, Panagoulas E, Bullock A, et al. How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009–2014. BMJ Open. 2017;: p. e013656. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 49. Stephens M, Bader K, Myers K, Walker M, Varpio L. Examining professional identity formation through the ancient art of mask-making. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;: p. 1–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 50. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE; 2006. [Google Scholar] 51. Elliott N, Higgins A. Surviving grounded theory research method in an academic world: proposal writing and theoretical frameworks. Grounded theory review. 2012; 11(2). 52. Wenger E. Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore C, editor. Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer; 2010. pp. 179–198. [Google Scholar] 53. Alvesson M, Willmott H. Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual. J Manag Stud. 2002;39(5):619–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] Articles from Medical Science Educator are provided here courtesy of Springer What is hidden curriculum example?For example, one teacher may give tough assignments and expect all students to do well on those assignments, while another teacher may give comparatively easy assignments and habitually award all students passing grades even when their work quality is low.
What are the disadvantages of hidden curriculum?Advantages and Disadvantages of the Hidden Curriculum. What are some examples of things students learn from a school's hidden curriculum?Examples of things taught through the 'hidden curriculum:. respecting authority.. respect for other pupils' opinions.. punctuality.. aspiring to achieve.. having a 'work ethic'. What is an example of the hidden curriculum quizlet?At most schools, an example of a hidden curriculum would be the teaching of reading and writing.
|