Show Defining Censorship
How does the Supreme Court describe speech that is likely to cause immediate violence?Fighting words are words meant to incite violence such that they may not be protected free speech under the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court first defined them in Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (1942) as words which "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Why was the 1st Amendment considered to be such an important idea for Americans?The First Amendment introduced bold new ideas to the world: that government must not impose a state religion on the public, or place undue restrictions on religious practice, but must recognize the right of the people to believe and worship, or not, as their conscience dictates.
In which case would free speech be limited by the government?Freedom of speech can be limited during wartime. The government can restrict expressions that would create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. Read More.
In which event would we see freedom of assembly be limited?Violence or the threat of violence isn't the only limit on the right of assembly. Authorities may also prevent or stop gatherings that pose other immediate threats to public safety. Police routinely arrest protesters who block traffic on freeways or bridges.
|