Which of the following developments helps to explain the change in agricultural depicted in the graph?

[Cattle, horses, and people at the fair with stables in the background] Popular Graphic Arts

The completion of the railroads to the West following the Civil War opened up vast areas of the region to settlement and economic development. White settlers from the East poured across the Mississippi to mine, farm, and ranch. African-American settlers also came West from the Deep South, convinced by promoters of all-black Western towns that prosperity could be found there. Chinese railroad workers further added to the diversity of the region's population.

Nội dung chính

  • Additional Navigation
  • Which of the following developments helps explain the rise in exports from the west coast depicted in the graph?
  • Which of the following developments best explains the reasons for the growth of a new urban culture?
  • Which of the following historical developments contributed most directly to the market revolution?
  • Which of the following was true of the Dawes Act of 1887?

Settlement from the East transformed the Great Plains. The huge herds of American bison that roamed the plains were almost wiped out, and farmers plowed the natural grasses to plant wheat and other crops. The cattle industry rose in importance as the railroad provided a practical means for getting the cattle to market.

The loss of the bison and growth of white settlement drastically affected the lives of the Native Americans living in the West. In the conflicts that resulted, the American Indians, despite occasional victories, seemed doomed to defeat by the greater numbers of settlers and the military force of the U.S. government. By the 1880s, most American Indians had been confined to reservations, often in areas of the West that appeared least desirable to white settlers.

The cowboy became the symbol for the West of the late 19th century, often depicted in popular culture as a glamorous or heroic figure. The stereotype of the heroic white cowboy is far from true, however. The first cowboys were Spanish vaqueros, who had introduced cattle to Mexico centuries earlier. Black cowboys also rode the range. Furthermore, the life of the cowboy was far from glamorous, involving long, hard hours of labor, poor living conditions, and economic hardship.

The myth of the cowboy is only one of many myths that have shaped our views of the West in the late 19th century. Recently, some historians have turned away from the traditional view of the West as a frontier, a "meeting point between civilization and savagery" in the words of historian Frederick Jackson Turner. They have begun writing about the West as a crossroads of cultures, where various groups struggled for property, profit, and cultural dominance. Think about these differing views of the history of the West as you examine the documents in this collection.

To find additional documents in Loc.gov on topics related to the West, use such keywords as West, ranching, Native Americans, and pioneers, or search using the names of states or cities in the West.

Documents

  • The Architecture of the West
    • Denver, Colorado, 1898
    • Pueblo de Taos, New Mexico, 1891(?)
    • Old Mission Church, Los Angeles, California, between 1880 and 1899
    • Salt Lake City, Utah, 1896
    • The Old Carreta, Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico, 1890
    • A Mexican Home (ranchita), between 1880 and 1897
  • As Some Things Appear on the Plains and Among the Rockies in Mid-Summer
  • Beef and Beans
    • John Robinson
    • Lee D. Leverett
    • Henry Young
  • The Extermination of the American Bison
  • I Will Go West
    • Edward Riley
    • Elizabeth Roe
  • American Indian and Oklahoma Territories Maps
    • Indian territory.
    • Map of the Indian and Oklahoma territories.

Part of

  • Primary Source Sets
  • Lesson Plans
  • Presentations

Additional Navigation

  • Teachers Home

    The Library of Congress offers classroom materials and professional development to help teachers effectively use primary sources from the Library's vast digital collections in their teaching.

  • Analysis Tool & Guide

    To help your students analyze these primary sources, get a graphic organizer and guides.


Page 2

cial bond. There is the bond of trust—that NRCS stands for scientific objectivity, a commitment to a productive agriculture in harmony with a healthy land and a belief that voluntary stewardship works.

When American agriculture was asked to meet the conservation compliance requirements laid out in the 1985 farm bill, the farmers of this country said, “Yes, we'll do it. We'll accelerate our stewardship effort. But we want the Natural Resources Conservation Service (back then it was the Soil Conservation Service) at our side.” They said that because they trusted NRCS, because they wanted standards to be as consistent and fair as humanly possible across the land, and because they wanted real experts at their side as they took on new ways of farming. And just look at what has been accomplished in the last 10 years, Mr. Chairman, basically without a hitch! I don't believe this country could have done it without the help of the Natural Resources Conservation Service.

The business of agriculture, with its growing environmental responsibilities, is getting more complex by the hour. That makes the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and its chemistry” with people and good science, all the more important to the agriculture community and really to society at large. This “chemistry” has resulted in a partnership that benefits the land and local people.

There are many types of partnerships—but we think this partnership is uniquely suited to helping this country solve its natural resource problems. First of all-it is a partnership that works voluntarily with private landowners, farmers, and ranchers. It respects private property rights, recognizing that the landowners and users must have control over what happens on their properties as it affects their present and future economic well-being and the future sustainability of their lives and businesses. And yet, it is a partnership that challenges landowners and users to think beyond themselvesto think of natural resource issues that begin on their properties but reach into our communities as a whole. The partnership calls upon our instincts towards stewardship, towards supporting our communities and future generations that will use their land and live in their communities.

The partnership is dynamic and can adapt quickly to changes in technology, fi. nancial resources that our partners bring to the table, and changing local demands and interests at the local level. The partnership encompasses multiple levels and types of knowledge, information and understanding, and allows it to make maximum use of all the strengths and abilities that each of us bring to the table.

It is critical that you understands the currency of this partnership: In large part, it is the programs and resources that each individual member of the partnership brings to it. In the case of NRCS, it is its technical assistance capabilities, the soil survey program, the snow survey program, our small watersheds restoration program, the Great Plains program, our data sets generated by the National Resources Inventory, the Resource Conservation Act appraisals, and many others.

Each of these components have value in and of themselves. They each allow the agency and the partnership to do specific things that are necessary to identify and solve problems. But it is just as important to recognize and understand that our leadership at the state level uses these components, these programs, to create a web of interactions, a system, where the value of one component is leveraged because it frees up other resources held by our partners to do other work.

This is the principle of comparative advantage, and it is working dynamically and powerfully in this partnership. I encourage you to speak with your state conservationist, explore with them the partnership that has been created in your state to solve your constituent's problems, and see how the programs and policies of NRCS make this partnership possible.

I have behind me, and you should have before you on paper, a diagram that depicts this web, this system at work in each of your states. As you can see, we have depicted the interactions that occur daily and persist over time, and that make possible a partnership on the land that respects private property rights, but challenges us to reach beyond just our properties.

You must be careful as you contemplate each of the programs and activities of NRCS—because you cannot think of them in isolation. In the diagram behind me, the partnership is supported by these programs woven together as in a fabric or web. Pulling out one of these threads puts at risk numerous other activities that are united by this system of components. Of course, we do not want this to happen, but individual components CAN be pulled out, but not easily. We need to work closely with you as you consider the difficult decisions before you to ensure that as much of the capacity and strength of this partnership can survive.

Mr. Chairman, I should mention one other critical element of the partnership that you see depicted in this diagram. I mentioned it earlier, and it needs to be repeated— Trust. It is one of the intangibles that is created over years of shared commitment and shared contributions to solving important and difficult problems. It

Which of the following developments helps explain the rise in exports from the west coast depicted in the graph?

Which of the following developments helps to explain the rise in exports from the West Coast depicted in the graph? An expansion in the railroad network led to greater access of western farmers to eastern markets.

Which of the following developments best explains the reasons for the growth of a new urban culture?

Which of the following developments best explains the reasons for the growth of a new urban culture in the late 1800s? International and internal migration increased urban populations and brought diverse people to cities.

Which of the following historical developments contributed most directly to the market revolution?

Which of the following historical developments contributed most directly to the market revolution? The emergence of new forms of transportation.

Which of the following was true of the Dawes Act of 1887?

Which of the following was true of the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 ? It eliminated most tribal land ownership in favor of ownership by individuals.

Which of the following developments helps to explain the change in agriculture depicted in the graph?

Q. Which of the following developments helps to explain the change in agriculture depicted in the graph? The extraction of western resources led to the growth of new towns and cities that demanded agricultural goods.

Which of the following developments helps explain the rise in exports from the west coast depicted in the graph?

Which of the following developments helps to explain the rise in exports from the West Coast depicted in the graph? An expansion in the railroad network led to greater access of western farmers to eastern markets.

Which of the following developments best explains the reasons for the growth of a new urban culture in the late 1800s?

Which of the following developments best explains the reasons for the growth of a new urban culture in the late 1800s? International and internal migration increased urban populations and brought diverse people to cities.

Which of the following was a result of the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 quizlet?

Which of the following was the intended result of the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887? Native Americans would be coaxed off reservations by land grants and would thus assimilate into Western culture.