Show
Terms in this set (76)A large retail store has 150 employees, of which 50 are supervisors. Whereas 60% of the employees are women, only 20% of the supervisors are women. This is much lower than the industry average of 40% female supervisors. The company does not have a consensual relationship policy. In the past six months, the company has received four complaints of insensitive behavior.
In the first complaint, a female employee reports that her supervisor has repeatedly asked her for sexual favors in exchange for better assignments. On her refusal, the supervisor began making unreasonable assignments and started critiquing her work through written memos. The employee is concerned she will lose her job. In the second complaint, an employee reports that two of her coworkers are dating and that it bothers her. In the third complaint, a female worker reports that a male supervisor
is making sexually derogatory comments at work. In the fourth complaint, a male worker reports that his female supervisor asked him out on a date and that he wants a transfer to a different department if it happens again. The HR director decides to have the employees for whom he is responsible go through a two-day diversity training program. As a part of their diversity training, all managers are required to complete a module on sensitivity training. During one such program, the trainer asks the
class to form groups based on gender. The trainer then asks the men to behave the way they perceive women to behave at the workplace and vice versa. Unfortunately, during this exercise, the women start using vulgar words and physically touching the men. This indicates that sexual harassment against women is a major problem in the organization. A large retail store has 150 employees, of which 50 are supervisors. Whereas 60% of the employees are women, only 20% of
the supervisors are women. This is much lower than the industry average of 40% female supervisors. The company does not have a consensual relationship policy. In the past six months, the company has received four complaints of insensitive behavior. In the first complaint, a female employee reports that her supervisor has repeatedly asked her for sexual favors in exchange for better assignments. On her refusal, the supervisor began making unreasonable assignments and started critiquing her work
through written memos. The employee is concerned she will lose her job. In the second complaint, an employee reports that two of her coworkers are dating and that it bothers her. In the third complaint, a female worker reports that a male supervisor is making sexually derogatory comments at work. In the fourth complaint, a male worker reports that his female supervisor asked him out on a date and that he wants a transfer to a different department if it happens again. The HR director decides to
have the employees for whom he is responsible go through a two-day diversity training program. As a part of their diversity training, all managers are required to complete a module on sensitivity training. During one such program, the trainer asks the class to form groups based on gender. The trainer then asks the men to behave the way they perceive women to behave at the workplace and vice versa. Unfortunately, during this exercise, the women start using vulgar words and physically touching the
men. This indicates that sexual harassment against women is a major problem in the organization. An HR generalist is assigned to support a scientific organization. Those in leadership positions in the organization are highly educated, most with doctorates. Some are Nobel Prize winners. Those in supporting positions tend to have jobs that are clerical in nature. Most do not have college degrees. In addition, the leadership and support teams have strong ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic differences among them that
result in cultural conflicts. The leadership team is highly critical of the level and quality of support it receives from the support staff and has gradually eliminated, outsourced, or automated large segments of support tasks. The size of the support team has dwindled to half the size it was five years earlier. An administrative analyst from the human factors division asks to meet with the HR generalist to discuss bias in the division. The administrative analyst complains that the scientists do
not respect administrative analysts, do not utilize them fully, and do not share critical information with them. The administrative analyst wants to file a complaint. The following week a scientist in the human factors division calls the HR generalist and says he wants to fire the administrative analyst for incompetence. Later, the scientist contacts the HR generalist again to say he wants to eliminate the administrative analyst's job. He explains that if and when the leadership team needs
support for the tasks that the administrative analyst performs, it will contract for that support. An HR generalist is assigned to support a scientific organization. Those in leadership positions in the organization are highly educated, most with doctorates. Some are Nobel Prize winners. Those
in supporting positions tend to have jobs that are clerical in nature. Most do not have college degrees. In addition, the leadership and support teams have strong ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic differences among them that result in cultural conflicts. The leadership team is highly critical of the level and quality of support it receives from the support staff and has gradually eliminated, outsourced, or automated large segments of support tasks. The size of the support team has dwindled to
half the size it was five years earlier. An administrative analyst from the human factors division asks to meet with the HR generalist to discuss bias in the division. The administrative analyst complains that the scientists do not respect administrative analysts, do not utilize them fully, and do not share critical information with them. The administrative analyst wants to file a complaint. The following week a scientist in the human factors division calls the HR generalist and says he wants to
fire the administrative analyst for incompetence. Later, the scientist contacts the HR generalist again to say he wants to eliminate the administrative analyst's job. He explains that if and when the leadership team needs support for the tasks that the administrative analyst performs, it will contract for that support. An HR generalist is assigned to support a scientific organization. Those in leadership positions in the organization
are highly educated, most with doctorates. Some are Nobel Prize winners. Those in supporting positions tend to have jobs that are clerical in nature. Most do not have college degrees. In addition, the leadership and support teams have strong ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic differences among them that result in cultural conflicts. The leadership team is highly critical of the level and quality of support it receives from the support staff and has gradually eliminated, outsourced, or automated
large segments of support tasks. The size of the support team has dwindled to half the size it was five years earlier. An administrative analyst from the human factors division asks to meet with the HR generalist to discuss bias in the division. The administrative analyst complains that the scientists do not respect administrative analysts, do not utilize them fully, and do not share critical information with them. The administrative analyst wants to file a complaint. The following week a
scientist in the human factors division calls the HR generalist and says he wants to fire the administrative analyst for incompetence. Later, the scientist contacts the HR generalist again to say he wants to eliminate the administrative analyst's job. He explains that if and when the leadership team needs support for the tasks that the administrative analyst performs, it will contract for that support. A mid-level HR specialist has been tasked to revise and implement the organization's new supervisor training program to accommodate the onboarding of new supervisors by the end of the month. In the past, this training has been provided by an external consultant, who has worked with the HR specialist to tailor the consultant's existing training content to include information specific to the organization. Now, to cut costs,
the HR director has asked the HR specialist to bring the program in-house. The HR director has specified that the existing content is to be used as a starting point. The HR specialist has also been asked to benchmark best practices in supervisory training and review applicable laws and regulations that are important for new supervisors to understand. In addition, the HR director wants the HR specialist to study the effectiveness of the existing training in preventing discrimination complaints
and other unfair treatment claims. Finally, the HR specialist has also been directed to add a diversity and inclusion module to the program. The HR director of a midsized organization provides HR services to 15,000 employees and is an outsourced HR system provider to a cluster of smaller companies that are suppliers to his organization. The legacy HR system used by the organization operates using
an outdated computer programming language. Recently, the chief information officer told the HR director that the legacy HR system is out of date and should be replaced by more modern technology. Therefore, the HR director decides to buy an HR module from an enterprise resources planning (ERP) vendor. Through discussions with the vendor, the HR director learns that the HR module is undergoing a re-engineering process that is not yet complete, and as such the organization would be the first new
customer. The HR director also learns that the new system would require hardware changes to run the new software, but the vendor promises to customize it for the organization. Ultimately, the HR director is concerned about the implementation costs quoted by the ERP vendor. As a result, the HR director does not accept the ERP's implementation cost proposal and engages a different, small business IT provider with lower rates to handle the implementation. The HR director also decides to use HR
employees in his office that have an aptitude for technology to provide project management support. Unfortunately, when the new HR system launches, it has multiple problems including a high error rate, lost data, inefficient screen navigation, and a poorly designed user interface. The HR director of a midsized organization provides HR services to 15,000 employees and is an outsourced HR system provider to a cluster of smaller companies
that are suppliers to his organization. The legacy HR system used by the organization operates using an outdated computer programming language. Recently, the chief information officer told the HR director that the legacy HR system is out of date and should be replaced by more modern technology. Therefore, the HR director decides to buy an HR module from an enterprise resources planning (ERP) vendor. Through discussions with the vendor, the HR director learns that the HR module is undergoing a
re-engineering process that is not yet complete, and as such the organization would be the first new customer. The HR director also learns that the new system would require hardware changes to run the new software, but the vendor promises to customize it for the organization. Ultimately, the HR director is concerned about the implementation costs quoted by the ERP vendor. As a result, the HR director does not accept the ERP's implementation cost proposal and engages a different, small business
IT provider with lower rates to handle the implementation. The HR director also decides to use HR employees in his office that have an aptitude for technology to provide project management support. Unfortunately, when the new HR system launches, it has multiple problems including a high error rate, lost data, inefficient screen navigation, and a poorly designed user interface. A department executive notifies the VP of HR
that an involuntary termination needs to occur the following day, when the VP of HR is scheduled to leave on a planned vacation. The VP of HR immediately meets with the only other HR staff member, an HR analyst who was promoted two months ago from an office administrator position, to summarize the situation and offer guidance on how to handle the termination. The next day during the termination meeting, the department executive informs the employee about the termination, says that HR will
explain the rest of the process, then quickly leaves the room. The company's management believes terminating employees is HR's responsibility, and management team members reluctantly participate. However, company policy states it is a dual responsibility of HR and management. The HR analyst can only remember some key points from the meeting with the VP of HR to explain the reason for the termination, prompting the employee to comment about its unfairness. The HR analyst ignores these comments
and escorts the employee to collect personal belongings before departing the building. The employee spends a significant amount of time removing electronic files, collecting belongings, and explaining the situation to coworkers. The HR analyst quietly waits for the employee to finish, not knowing how to expedite the uncomfortable situation. Eventually, the employee leaves without incident. Upon the VP of HR's return, the HR analyst explains the situation and associated challenges. The VP of HR
praises the analyst, but provides no additional feedback. A department executive notifies the VP of HR that an involuntary termination needs to occur the following day, when the VP of HR is scheduled to leave on a planned vacation. The VP of HR immediately meets with the only other HR staff
member, an HR analyst who was promoted two months ago from an office administrator position, to summarize the situation and offer guidance on how to handle the termination. The next day during the termination meeting, the department executive informs the employee about the termination, says that HR will explain the rest of the process, then quickly leaves the room. The company's management believes terminating employees is HR's responsibility, and management team members reluctantly participate.
However, company policy states it is a dual responsibility of HR and management. The HR analyst can only remember some key points from the meeting with the VP of HR to explain the reason for the termination, prompting the employee to comment about its unfairness. The HR analyst ignores these comments and escorts the employee to collect personal belongings before departing the building. The employee spends a significant amount of time removing electronic files, collecting belongings, and
explaining the situation to coworkers. The HR analyst quietly waits for the employee to finish, not knowing how to expedite the uncomfortable situation. Eventually, the employee leaves without incident. Upon the VP of HR's return, the HR analyst explains the situation and associated challenges. The VP of HR praises the analyst, but provides no additional feedback. A department executive notifies the VP of HR that an
involuntary termination needs to occur the following day, when the VP of HR is scheduled to leave on a planned vacation. The VP of HR immediately meets with the only other HR staff member, an HR analyst who was promoted two months ago from an office administrator position, to summarize the situation and offer guidance on how to handle the termination. The next day during the termination meeting, the department executive informs the employee about the termination, says that HR will explain the
rest of the process, then quickly leaves the room. The company's management believes terminating employees is HR's responsibility, and management team members reluctantly participate. However, company policy states it is a dual responsibility of HR and management. The HR analyst can only remember some key points from the meeting with the VP of HR to explain the reason for the termination, prompting the employee to comment about its unfairness. The HR analyst ignores these comments and escorts
the employee to collect personal belongings before departing the building. The employee spends a significant amount of time removing electronic files, collecting belongings, and explaining the situation to coworkers. The HR analyst quietly waits for the employee to finish, not knowing how to expedite the uncomfortable situation. Eventually, the employee leaves without incident. Upon the VP of HR's return, the HR analyst explains the situation and associated challenges. The VP of HR praises the
analyst, but provides no additional feedback. A department executive notifies the VP of HR that an involuntary termination needs to occur the following day, when the VP of HR is scheduled to leave on a planned vacation. The VP of HR immediately meets with the only other HR staff member, an HR analyst who was promoted two months ago from an office administrator position, to summarize the situation and offer guidance on how to handle the termination. The next
day during the termination meeting, the department executive informs the employee about the termination, says that HR will explain the rest of the process, then quickly leaves the room. The company's management believes terminating employees is HR's responsibility, and management team members reluctantly participate. However, company policy states it is a dual responsibility of HR and management. The HR analyst can only remember some key points from the meeting with the VP of HR to explain the
reason for the termination, prompting the employee to comment about its unfairness. The HR analyst ignores these comments and escorts the employee to collect personal belongings before departing the building. The employee spends a significant amount of time removing electronic files, collecting belongings, and explaining the situation to coworkers. The HR analyst quietly waits for the employee to finish, not knowing how to expedite the uncomfortable situation. Eventually, the employee leaves
without incident. Upon the VP of HR's return, the HR analyst explains the situation and associated challenges. The VP of HR praises the analyst, but provides no additional feedback. The marketing department of a manufacturing company launches
several new initiatives to increase the company's sales and profit margin. Strong promotion of these initiatives generates excitement throughout the company. Employees discuss the creativity of these efforts, and their expectations for the company to exceed forecasts. Several weeks after the launch of these new initiatives, there are reports of a 70% increase in the number of unanswered calls in the customer service call center. The call center's general manager is distressed about this report
and believes the increase in unanswered calls is due to failure to include the call center in communications regarding the new initiatives. As a result, the call center was not prepared to handle the volume of calls and unable to resolve customers' issues in a timely manner. The call center's poor service decreases customer loyalty and satisfaction, and negatively impacts the company's sales and profit margins. The company's president, disappointed with the call center's minimal support for the
new initiative, asks the HR manager to observe the call center's procedures and determine why calls are not handled effectively. The president expects call center employees to understand the time sensitivity of the new initiatives, work cohesively, and learn to address new types of customer issues. Additionally, employees in the headquarters office seek reassurance that the initial drop in profits, when compared to targets, is temporary and that the company will achieve its original
projections. The marketing department of a manufacturing company launches several new initiatives to increase the company's sales and profit margin. Strong promotion of these initiatives generates excitement throughout the company. Employees discuss the
creativity of these efforts, and their expectations for the company to exceed forecasts. Several weeks after the launch of these new initiatives, there are reports of a 70% increase in the number of unanswered calls in the customer service call center. The call center's general manager is distressed about this report and believes the increase in unanswered calls is due to failure to include the call center in communications regarding the new initiatives. As a result, the call center was not
prepared to handle the volume of calls and unable to resolve customers' issues in a timely manner. The call center's poor service decreases customer loyalty and satisfaction, and negatively impacts the company's sales and profit margins. The company's president, disappointed with the call center's minimal support for the new initiative, asks the HR manager to observe the call center's procedures and determine why calls are not handled effectively. The president expects call center employees to
understand the time sensitivity of the new initiatives, work cohesively, and learn to address new types of customer issues. Additionally, employees in the headquarters office seek reassurance that the initial drop in profits, when compared to targets, is temporary and that the company will achieve its original projections. 157. What is the correct progression of evaluation levels in Kirkpatrick's training evaluation
model? Sets found in the same folderWhich of the following steps is first when developing an effective learning initiative?Step 1: Conduct a Needs Assessment
Once the decision is made to allocate resources to learning, it is necessary to determine how they will be allocated.
Which of the following should be the HR manager's greatest concern after reading the employee's email?Which should be the HR manager's greatest concern after reading the employee's email? The employee might become disengaged and exhibit lower performance.
What tool might a company decide to use to track a variety of performance measures across the organization?The balanced scorecard recommends that managers gain an overview of the organization's performance by tracking a small number of key measures that collectively reflect four dimensions: financial focus, customer focus, internal business process focus, and.
How do succession planning and workforce planning compare in terms of the targeted employee groups?Whereas Workforce Planning helps your organization compare and contrast your workforce's needs with those of your business processes determined by set objectives and long-term goals, Succession Planning gives you the insight into who has the skills to grow into higher up positions within your company.
|