Show
International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised 2019), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement, promotes a more consistent and robust risk assessment by the auditor that will drive an appropriate and effective response to those risks. Importantly, the standard also helps auditors keep up with the evolving environment in which businesses operate, including in relation to technology.
Effective Date:December 15, 2021 Translations & PermissionsLooking to translate or reproduce the standards? Want to include these publications in your training materials or university course? Learn how we can help. IP permissions and policies SA 315 deals with the responsibility of auditor in identifying and assessing the risk of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment Effective DateSA 315 is effective for audits of financial statements for the period beginning on or after April 1, 2008. ObjectiveThe objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risk of material misstatement in an entity’s financial statement and implement appropriate responses (Refer SA 330) & procedures which will reduce such risk to an acceptably low level. DefinitionsAssertions “Representations by the management, explicit or otherwise, that are embodied in the financial statements, as used by the auditor to consider the different types of potential misstatements that may occur” Business risk “A risk resulting from significant conditions, events, circumstances, actions or inactions that could adversely affect an entity’s ability to achieve its objectives and excludes strategies, or from the settling of inappropriate objectives” Significant risk “An identified or assessed risk of material misstatements that, in the auditor’s judgment requires special audit consideration” Requirements
File your returns in just 3 minutes 100% pre-fill. No manual data entry Entity’s EnvironmentThe auditor should obtain an understanding of the following: Entity’s Internal ControlThe auditor should understand the relevant internal control for the audit. Professional judgment is to be applied by the auditor to identify such relevant controls (individually or combined): Entity’s Risk ProcessThe auditor should obtain an understanding of whether the entity has a process of:
When understanding the entity’s risk assessment process, if the auditor identifies any new risk then it has to be evaluated whether there was an underlying risk of a kind that would have been identified by the entity’s risk assessment process. If there is such a risk, then the reason for the non-identification by risk assessment process should be understood and evaluate the process is appropriate or determine if there is a significant deficiency in internal control. If there is no such process, the auditor has to discuss with the management whether business risk relevant to financial reporting objectives have been identified and addressed. Auditor has to evaluate whether an absence of a documented risk assessment process is appropriate or determine whether it represents a significant deficiency in internal control. Information System ActivitiesAuditor to obtain an understanding of how the entity communicates financial reporting roles & responsibilities including:
Control ActivitiesAuditor to understand the control activities relevant to the audit through which the risk at the assertion level can be assessed and design further audit procedures responsive to assessed risk. Only those control activities related to the significant class of transactions, account balance and disclosure in the financial statements relevant to the assessed risk:
Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material MisstatementIn order to provide a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures, the auditor has to identify and assess the risk of material misstatement at:
The risk that requires Special Audit ConsiderationsIn Auditor’s opinion, if any of the identified risks is a significant risk, the auditor has to obtain an understanding of the entity’s control, including control activities relevant to that risk. Following are to be considered to identify a risk as significant:
Revision of Risk AssessmentDuring an audit, if the auditor obtains additional audit evidence or new information which changes the level of risk assessed then auditor should revise the assessment and modify the further planned audit procedures accordingly Documentation
Get an expert at affordable price For ITR, GST returns, Company Registration, Trademark Registration, GST Registration What should auditor do if there is material misstatement?When an auditor finds a material misstatement and management does not correct it, the auditor should evaluate the effect of the misstatement on the financial statements and decide whether it is necessary to modify his or her audit opinion.
How does the auditor respond to a high level of assessed risk of material misstatement at financial statement level?The auditor's responses to the assessed risks of material misstatement, particularly fraud risks, should involve the application of professional skepticism in gathering and evaluating audit evidence.
What are the risk assessment procedures in auditing?Risk assessment procedures are performed to validate information obtained during the risk assessment process. identifying the existence of unusual transactions or events, and amounts, ratios, and trends that might indicate matters that have financial statement and audit planning implications.
What audit procedures are designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level?(b) Test of controls – An audit procedure designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material misstatements at the assertion level.
|