The statute of frauds recognizes electronic signatures as legally enforceable.

Supported by our internationally recognised shipping teams across the globe, we have extensive experience in providing dispute resolution services as well as advising on non-contentious matters arising from the international sale and transportation of commodities. Our expertise covers a broad range of commodities, including softs, oils, their by-products, energy and metals.

An intimate knowledge of trade associations’ standard forms, rules and practices and extensive experience of High Court disputes enable us to offer clients an unparalleled service. We act for shippers, traders and end-users as well as their insurers, and we advise trade associations such as the ICA, SAL and RSA as well as working alongside Gafta and FOSFA.

THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS [4319]

����� Statute of Frauds: A statute which requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable.

�        Although statutes of frauds vary somewhat from state to state, the following types of contracts must be in writing to be enforceable:

(1)�� contracts for the sale or lease of, or a mortgage on, real property (e.g., land, fixtures);

(2)�� contracts that cannot, by their terms, be performed within one year after the date the contract was formed;

(3)�� collateral contracts, such as promises to answer for or guaranty the debt or duty of another person;

(4)�� promises made in consideration of marriage (i.e., prenuptial agreements); and

(5)�� contracts for the sale of goods valued at $500 or more.

THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS: EXCEPTIONS ucc2-201/4319.04

����� Exceptions to the Statute of Frauds: A contract which might otherwise be unenforceable because it is not in writing may be enforced to some degree as follows:

�        Partial Performance Accepted: If a buyer has taken partial possession of real or personal property and paid that part of the contract price attributable to the property received, and if the parties cannot be returned to their pre-contractual positions, a court may order that the remainder of the contract be specifically performed -�that is, performed according to the precise terms of the contract.

����� Under the Uniform Commercial Code, an oral contract is enforceable to the extent that the seller has accepted payment or the buyer has accepted delivery of the goods covered by the oral contract.

����� Promissory Estoppel: If a promisor makes a promise on which the promisee justifiably relies to the promisee�s detriment, the promisor may be estoppedfrom denying the existence and validity of the contract.

THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS:

SUFFICIENCY OF THE WRITING

����� A written contract, signed by both parties, satisfies the requirements of the statute of frauds. What else will suffice?

�        A writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought;

����� A confirmation, invoice, sales slip, check, or fax, or any combination thereof; or

�        Several documents which, in combination, provide the terms for an agreement.

����� An agreement does not need to be signed at the bottom, but may be signed anywhere on the agreement; moreover, initials will suffice where there is no signature.

����� The writing(s) need only contain the essential terms of the contract: name of the parties, subject matter, quantity, and consideration.

����� Whether price is an �essential� term depends on the type of contract in question.

THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE� 4320

������ Parol Evidence Rule: A substantive rule of contract law under which a court will not admit evidence of the parties� prior negotiations, prior oral or written agreements, or contemporaneous oral agreements if that evidence contra�dicts or varies the terms of a written contract.

����� Integration: The determination of whether parol evidence will be considered revolves around the court�s determination of whether the written contract is integrated -- that is, if it constitutes the final expression of the parties� agreement.

THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE: EXCEPTIONS 4320.04

>���� Courts have recognized numerous exceptions to the operation of the parol evidence rule. In addition, there are certain statutory exceptions which apply to contracts under the Uniform Commercial Code. Among the better-established exceptions are the following:

����� Evidence of subsequent modification;

����� Evidence of mistake, fraud, or misrepresentation in the formation of the written contract;

����� Evidence which may resolve an ambiguity and/or fill in a missing term or condition in the written contract;

����� Evidence of prior dealing between the parties, usage of trade in the relevant locale and/or trade, and course of performance under the contract by the parties;

����� Evidence of an oral condition precedent to the written contract; and

����� Evidence of an obvious or gross clerical error.

Which of the following is not a valid exception to the Statute of Frauds?

What is the primary purpose of the Statute of Frauds?

Which of the following needs to be in writing to be enforceable under the Statute of Frauds?

Which of the following contracts must be in writing to be enforceable?