Similarities between Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Bill of Rights

Overview

This activity asks participants to compare rights proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) with those present in the US Bill of Rights and Amendments. It challenges them to explore reasons for the presence or absence of certain rights and to reflect on the role of government in guaranteeing rights. (Note: Some prior knowledge of the UDHR and Bill of Rights is needed).

Procedure

1. Ask participants to complete Handout 1, Comparing Rights Documents. Have participants refer to the UDHR and to the US Bill of Rights and Amendments to check their answers.

2. Discuss:

  • What did you discover that was a surprise to you?

  • Which rights asserted in the UDHR or US Bill of Rights and Amendments do you believe should or should not be universal? Give reasons.

  • Do you think the Bill of Rights and Amendments cover more issues than the UDHR? Why or why not?|
  • Did the writers of the Bill of Rights and the writers of the UDHR have different conceptions of what "rights" means? If so, how did their understandings of "rights" differ?

  • Do US citizens have any rights besides those included in the Bill of Rights and Amendments, Constitution, and other US law? Explain.

  • Should the Bill of Rights and Amendments be more inclusive? Why or why not? What rights, if any, would you add? For example, should Americans be guaranteed the right to food, shelter, education, and health?

  • How do you explain why some social, economic, and cultural rights found in the UDHR are not guaranteed by the American documents?

  • In your opinion, what should be the limits and responsibilities of government in guaranteeing their citizens certain rights? For example, is hunger or homelessness a government’s responsibility?

Source: Adapted from David Shiman, Teaching Human Rights, (Denver: Center for Teaching International Relations Publications, University of Denver, 1993) 4-16.

Similarities between Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Bill of Rights

Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary.

-Reinhold Niebur

This is a preview. Log in through your library.

Journal Information

PS: Political Science and Politics is the Association's quarterly journal of the profession. The journal provides coverage of the broad range of observations and information about the discipline. Its coverage has evolved since its introduction in 1968 to include critical analyses of contemporary political phenomena by authors working within their own subfields aimed at the informed, general reader. As the journal of record for APSA, issues also include Association News, governance information, and professional opportunities.

Publisher Information

Founded in 1903, the American Political Science Association is the major professional society for individuals engaged in the study of politics and government. APSA brings together political scientists from all fields of inquiry, regions, and occupational endeavors. While most APSA members are scholars who teach and conduct research in colleges and universities in the U.S. and abroad, one-fourth work outside academe in government, research, organizations, consulting firms, the news media, and private enterprise. For more information about the APSA, its publications and programs, please see the APSA website.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
PS: Political Science and Politics © 1998 American Political Science Association
Request Permissions

Following the second world war, a series of declarations and covenants began to articulate universal human rights.

In 1948, for the first time, countries agreed on a comprehensive list of inalienable human rights. In December of that year, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a milestone that would profoundly influence the development of international human rights law.

In December 1966, the UN General Assembly adopted two international treaties that would further shape international human rights: the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights(ICESCR), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). These are often referred to as “the International Covenants.”

Together, the UDHR and these two Covenants are known as the International Bill of Human Rights.

Learn more about the UDHR

Learn about the specific rights covered by the ICESCR and the ICCPR, the responsibilities of States, and how the Covenants are monitored below.

The rights covered by the Covenants

The ICESCR and the ICCPR set out the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights that everyone is entitled to:

ICCPRICESCR
  • Freedom from discrimination
  • Right to equality between men and women
  • Right to life
  • Freedom from torture
  • Freedom from slavery
  • Right to liberty and security of person
  • Right to be treated with humanity in detention
  • Freedom of movement
  • Freedom of non-citizens from arbitrary expulsion
  • Right to fair trial
  • Right to recognition before the law
  • Right to privacy
  • Freedom of religion and belief
  • Freedom of expression
  • Right of peaceful assembly
  • Freedom of association
  • Right to marry and found a family
  • Right of children to birth registration and a nationality
  • Right to participate in public affairs
  • Right to equality before the law
  • Minority rights
  • Freedom from discrimination
  • Right to equality between men and women
  • Right to work
  • Freedom to choose and accept work
  • Right to just and favourable conditions at work
  • Right to form trade unions
  • Right to strike
  • Right to social security
  • Right of mothers to special protection before and after birth
  • Freedom of children from social and economic exploitation
  • Right to an adequate standard of living
  • Freedom from hunger
  • Right to health
  • Right to education
  • Freedom of parents to choose schooling for their children
  • Right to take part in cultural life
  • Right to enjoy benefits of science
  • Right of authors to moral and material interests from works
  • Freedom to undertake scientific research and creative activity

Responsibilities of States

The Covenants identify the responsibilities placed on States to respect, protect and fulfill those rights:

Respect

  • States must refrain from interfering directly or indirectly with your rights. For example, the State must not torture you or make you a slave. The State cannot force you to work in an area you have not freely chosen or stop you from speaking your language.

Protect

  • States must take measures to make sure that others, such as businesses, political groups or other people do not interfere with your rights. For example, the State must stop people using hate speech against you because of where you are from or who you are. And the State has to make sure that private companies provide a fair wage for your work and do not give different salaries to men and women who do the same job.

Fulfil

  • States must take steps to realize rights. For example, the State has to provide interpretation during trials if the accused cannot speak the language spoken in Court. The State must provide budgets to make sure everyone can access medicines and be free from hunger.

Examples of violations 

Your civil, political, economic, cultural, and social rights can be violated through various means. Violations occur when a Government fails in its obligations to respect, protect and fulfil these rights. Often a violation of one of these rights is linked to a violation of other rights. Examples include:

  • Forcibly evicting people from their homes (the right to adequate housing and the right to choose his or her place of residence)
  • Water treatment facilities contaminating drinking water (the right to health and the right to life)
  • Failure to ensure a minimum wage sufficient for a decent living (the right to work and the right to equality before the law) 
  • Denying a person access to information and services related to sexual and reproductive health (the right to health and the right to life)
  • Systematically segregating children with disabilities from mainstream schools (the right to education and the right to equality and non-discrimination)
  • Banning the use of minority or indigenous languages (the right to participate in cultural life and the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion, or to use their own language)

Ratification status of the Covenants by country

The International Bill of Human Rights is a powerful statement of your rights and should persuade all Governments to respect your rights. For the two Covenants to become binding in your country, your Government must ratify them. This means your Government must expressly agree to abide by them.

Check if your Government has ratified the Conventions

How the Covenants are monitored 

The UN Human Rights system uses different mechanisms to monitor how well the world is doing to ensure that everyone enjoys the rights set out in these Covenants.  

The human rights treaty bodies are among those mechanisms. The treaty bodies are committees of independent experts that monitor implementation of the 10 core international human rights treaties, including the CCPR and the CESCR. 

The following treaty bodies are responsible for monitoring the CCPR and the CESCR: 
●    The Human Rights Committee monitors the CCPR, and
●    The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights monitors the CESCR. 

How are the Declaration and Bill of Rights similar?

The Bill of Rights and Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen are based on the same principles of natural rights; therefore each document is similar in protecting the people's natural rights.

How does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relate to the United States Bill of Rights?

The UDHR lists the rights that all people around the world should have. In the United States, the Constitution and Bill of Rights describe and protect the human rights of all people in this country. The two documents have a similar purpose and protect some of the same rights, but there are many differences.

What is the difference between human rights and Bill of Rights?

The universalists argue that human rights belong to all humans on account of their humanity rather than membership of narrower categories such as citizenship, ethnicity or class. Bills of rights on the other hand tend to exclude by definition non-citizens from their protections.

What is the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration of human rights?

Constitutional rights are granted to individuals by virtue of their citizen ship or residence in a particular country whereas human rights are inherent and held as attributes of the human personality.