Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produced quizlet?

A company incurred $10,000 in DL costs and $8,000 in indirect labor costs. The journal entry to record this transaction debits _______

a. work in process $10,000 and MO $8,000 and credit salaries and wages payable $18,000
b. work in process $8,000 and MO $10,000 and credit salaries and wages payable $18,000
c. salaries and wages payable $18,000 and credit work in process $10,000 and MO $8,000

Company:
Estimated MO= $500,000
Estimated DL cost= $250,000
Actual MO= $720,000
Actual DL cost= $300,000
Dept. A:
Estimated MO= $338,000
Estimated DL cost= $130,000
Actual MO= $400,000
Actual DL cost= $160,000
Dept B:
Estimated MO= $162,000
Estimated DL cost= $120,000
Actual MO= $320,000
Actual DL cost= $140,000

Based on this info the POHR per DL dollar for Dept B is $ _______

The following info is available for the current year ending in Dec 31:

MO applied= $150,000
actual amount of MO costs= 120,000
amount of overhead applied during the yr that is in:
work in process= $37,500
finished goods= 52,500
COGS= 60,000
total overhead applied= $150,000

if the MO account is closed proportionally to work in process, finished goods, and COGS, the related entry will include a _______

a. debit to COGS for $12,000
b. credit to COGS for $12,000
c. credit to COGS for $30,000
d. debit to work in process for $7,500

b

The Manufacturing Overhead account has a credit balance of $30,000 before the adjustment to close the balance of this clearing account because the credits to the account for the amount applied of $150,000 exceed the debits to the account for the actual overhead costs of $120,000 by $30,000. The closing entry will include a debit to Manufacturing Overhead for $30,000 (to offset the existing credit balance), a credit to Work in Process for $7,500 (or $30,000 × 25%), a credit to Finished Goods for $10,500 (or $30,000 × 35%), and a credit to Cost of Goods Sold for $12,000 (or $30,000 × 40%).

The following info is available for the current year ending in Dec 31:

MO applied= $150,000
actual amount of MO costs= 120,000
amount of overhead applied during the yr that is in:
work in process= $37,500
finished goods= 52,500
COGS= 60,000
total overhead applied= $150,000

if the MO account is closed to COGS the related entry will _______

a. decrease the COGS sold by $30,000
b. increase the COGS by $30,000
c. decrease the COGS sold by $150,000
d. increase the COGS sold by $150,000

The following info is available for the current year ending Dec 31:

MO applied= $150,000
actual amount of MO costs= 120,000

What is the balance of the MO account and is overhead underapplied or overapplied at the end of the year

a. credit of $30,000, overapplied
b. credit of $30,000, underapplied
c. debit of $30,000, overapplied
d. debit of $30,000, underapplied

For the month of October, Janus Corporation used $30,000 worth of direct materials in production and incurred direct labor costs of $60,000. Actual manufacturing overhead costs were $40,000, whereas $45,000 was the manufacturing overhead applied to work in process. What is the amount of total manufacturing costs that would appear in the Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured for October?

$130,000

$90,000

$175,000

$135,000

Milton Corp. sold goods costing $50,000 for $75,000. Journal entries to be made could include entries debiting _______

a. COGS for $50,000 and accounts receivable for $75,000
b. sales for $50,000 and finished goods for $75,000
c. finished goods for $50,000 and sales revenue for $75,000
d. COGS for $75,000 and accounts receivable for $50,000

Recommended textbook solutions

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produced quizlet?

Century 21 Accounting: General Journal

11th EditionClaudia Bienias Gilbertson, Debra Gentene, Mark W Lehman

1,009 solutions

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produced quizlet?

Intermediate Accounting

14th EditionDonald E. Kieso, Jerry J. Weygandt, Terry D. Warfield

1,471 solutions

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produced quizlet?

Accounting: What the Numbers Mean

9th EditionDaniel F Viele, David H Marshall, Wayne W McManus

338 solutions

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produced quizlet?

Financial Accounting

4th EditionDon Herrmann, J. David Spiceland, Wayne Thomas

1,097 solutions

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another additional unit were produce?

Why is the unit product cost different from the cost that would be incurred if another (additional) unit were produced? The cost to produce another unit is the incremental or marginal cost.

What is the result when a company applies less overhead to production than it actually incurs?

2-12 When a company applied less overhead to production than it actually incurs, it creates what is known as underapplied overhead. When it applies more overhead to production than it actually incurs, it results in overapplied overhead. 2-13 A plantwide overhead rate is a single overhead rate used throughout a plant.

What kinds of costs are assigned to units of product in absorption costing?

Key Takeaways. Absorption costing differs from variable costing because it allocates fixed overhead costs to each unit of a product produced in the period. Absorption costing allocates fixed overhead costs to a product whether or not it was sold in the period.

What is the term used when a company applies less overhead to production than it actually incurs multiple choice 1?

Underapplied overhead is the opposite of overapplied overhead. Overapplied overhead occurs when expenses incurred are actually less than what a company accounts for in its budget. This means that a company comes in under budget and achieves a lower amount of overhead costs during the accounting period.