Why did President Roosevelt declare in 1904 that the United States would police all parts of the Caribbean?

Abstract

In 1904 the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine proclaimed that the United States would intervene in the affairs of unstable Central American and Caribbean countries that did not pay their debts. We find that the average sovereign debt price for countries under the U.S. “sphere of influence” rose by 74 percent in response to the pronouncement and actions to make it credible. We use this policy change to show that the United States subsequently acted as a regional hegemon and provided the global public goods of increased financial stability and peace. Reduced conflict spurred export growth and better fiscal management, but debt settlements were driven primarily by gunboat diplomacy.

References

Bai Jushan, and Pierre Perron. 1998Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes.” Econometrica 66, no. 1 4778.Google Scholar

Becker William H., and Samuel F. Jr. Wells, eds. 1984. Economics and World Power: An Assessment of American Diplomacy Since 1789. New York: Columbia University Press,

Borchard Edwin. 1951. State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders: General Principles, Vol. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,

Buchenau Jurgen. 1999.In the Shadow of a Giant: The Making of Mexico's Central America, 1876–1930. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama,

Bulmer-Thomas Victor. 1994.The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

Campbell John Y., Andrew W. Lo, and A. Craig MacKinley. 1997.The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University,

Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict. 1997. Preventing Deadly Conflict: Final Report. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation,

Corporation of Foreign Bondholders. Annual Report. London: CFB, various years.

Feis Herbert. 1964. Europe: The World's Banker 1870–1914, New York: Augustus M. Kelley,

Ferguson Niall. 2003. Empire: The Rise and Demise of British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power, New York: Basic Books,

Field Jr. James A., 1978American Imperialism: The Worst Chapter in Almost Any Book.” American Historical Review 83, no. 3 64488.Google Scholar

Gardner Lloyd C., Walter F. LaFeber, and Thomas J. McCormick. 1973. Creation of the American Empire: U.S. Diplomatic History, New York: Rand McNally,

Gilderhus Mark T. 2000. The Second Century: U.S.-Latin American Relations Since 1889, Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources,

Haggard Stephan, and Beth A. Simmons. 1987Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41, no. 3 491517.Google Scholar

Hamburg David A., and Jane E. Holl. “Preventing Deadly Conflict.” In Global Public Goods, edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern, 1999. 15289. New York: Oxford University Press,

Healy David. 1988. Drive to Hegemony: The United States in the Caribbean, 1898–1917, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,

Kelly Trish. 1998Ability and Willingness to Pay in the Age of Pax Britannica, 1890–1914.” Explorations in Economic History 35, no. 1 3158.Google Scholar

Keohane Robert. 1984. After Hegemony, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,

Kindleberger Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, Berkeley: University of California Press,

Kindleberger Charles P. 1981Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides.” International Studies Quarterly 25, no. 2 24254.Google Scholar

LaFeber Walter. 1963. The New Empire, Ithaca: Cornell University Press,

LaFeber Walter. 1978. The Panama Canal, New York: Oxford University Press,

Lal Deepak. 2001Globalization, Imperialism, and Regulation.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 14, no. 1 10721.Google Scholar

Lebergott Stanley. 1980The Returns to U.S. Imperialism, 1890–1929.” This JOURNAL 40, no. 2 22952.Google Scholar

Leonard Thomas M. 1991. Central America and the United States: The Search for Stability, Athens: University of Georgia Press,

Lewis Cleona. 1938. America's Stake in International Investments, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution,

Lipson Charles. 1985. Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Berkeley: University of California Press,

Marichal Carlos. 1989. A Century of Debt Crises in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,

McBeth Brian S. 2001. Gunboats, Corruption, and Claims: Foreign Intervention in Venezuela, 1899–1908, London: Greenwood Press,

Mitchener Kris James, and Marc Weidenmier. 2004. “Empire, Public Goods, and the Roosevelt Corollary.” NBER Working Paper 10729,

Munro Dana G. 1918. The Five Republics of Central America: Their Political and Economic Development and Their Relations with the United States, New York: Oxford University Press,

Platt D. C. M. 1968. Finance, Trade, and Politics in British Foreign Policy 1815–1914, Oxford: Clarendon Press,

Rippy J. Fred. 1934The British Bondholders and the Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.” Political Science Quarterly 49, no. 2 195206.Google Scholar

Rosenberg Emily S. 1999. Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

Schoultz Lars. 1998. Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy Toward Latin America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

Schulzinger Robert D. 1998. U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900, New York: Oxford University Press,

1913. Stock Exchange Year-Book, London: Thomas Skinner and Company,

Sylla Richard. 2000. “Experimental Federalism: The Economics of American Government, 1789–1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume 2, edited by Stanley L. Engerman and Robert E. Gallman, 483541. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

Weeks Gregory. 2001Almost Jeffersonian: U.S. Recognition Policy toward Latin America.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31, no. 3 490504.Google Scholar

Wilkins Mira. 1970. The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from the Colonial Era to 1914, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

Wyplosz Charles. “International Financial Instability.” In International Financial Instability , edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern, 1999. 15289. New York: Oxford University Press,

Young John Parke. 1925. Central American Currency and Finance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,

Zevin Robert. 1972An Interpretation of American Imperialism.” This JOURNAL 32, no. 1 31660.Google Scholar

What reason did President Roosevelt give that the United States was responsible for policing the Western Hemisphere?

What reason did President Roosevelt give that the United States was responsible for policing the Western Hemisphere? U.S. doctrine prevented other nations from intervening in the Americas.

What does Roosevelt mean when he says that the United States has international police power?

Roosevelt stated that in keeping with the Monroe Doctrine, the United States was justified in exercising "international police power" to put an end to chronic unrest or wrongdoing in the Western Hemisphere.

What did the Roosevelt Corollary of 1904 do?

The Roosevelt Corollary of December 1904 stated that the United States would intervene as a last resort to ensure that other nations in the Western Hemisphere fulfilled their obligations to international creditors, and did not violate the rights of the United States or invite “foreign aggression to the detriment of the ...

What was the main purpose of the Roosevelt Corollary?

The Roosevelt Corollary was conceived as a means to protect U.S. interests and preserve stability in Latin America by preventing European countries from interfering there. However, it came to be used as a justification for the U.S. to intervene in Latin American internal affairs and expand its influence in the region.