Classical variables sampling is a statistical sampling method for estimating: Show
Classical variables sampling works best with financial data that has the following characteristics:
Note In addition to financial data, you can use classical variables sampling with any numeric data that has a variable characteristic – for example, quantity, units of time, or other units of measurement. How it worksClassical variables sampling allows you to select and analyze a small subset of the records in an account, and based on the result estimate the total audited value of the account, and the total amount of monetary misstatement. The estimates are computed as ranges:
You compare the estimated range to the book value of the account, or to the misstatement amount that you judge is material, and make a determination regarding the account. Classical variables sampling supports making this sort of statement:
Overview of the classical variables sampling processCaution Do not skip calculating a valid sample size. If you go straight to drawing a sample of records, and guess at a sample size, there is a high likelihood that the projection of your analysis results will be invalid, and your final conclusion flawed. The classical variables sampling process involves the following general steps:
Numeric length limitationSeveral internal calculations occur during the preparation stage of classical variables sampling. These calculations support numbers with a maximum length of 17 digits. If the result of any calculation exceeds 17 digits, the result is not included in the output, and you cannot continue with the sampling process. Note that source data numbers of less than 17 digits can produce internal calculation results that exceed 17 digits. Values are retained and prefilled between stagesWhen you use Analytics for classical variables sampling you enter information in three separate dialog boxes, and run the associated commands, in this order:
As you move through this process, information from one dialog box is prefilled into the next dialog box. Prefilling saves considerable labor, and removes the risk of accidentally entering incorrect values and invalidating the sample. Important considerations
GuidelinesFollow these guidelines to make the end-to-end CVS process as smooth as possible:
StratificationClassical variables sampling gives you the option of numerically stratifying the records in a population before drawing a sample. The benefit of stratification is that it often dramatically reduces the required sample size while still maintaining statistical validity. A reduced sample size means less data analysis work is required to reach your goal. How it worksShow me more Stratification works by dividing a population into a number of subgroups, or levels, called strata. Ideally, the values in each stratum are relatively homogenous. A statistical algorithm (the Neyman method) sets the boundaries between the strata. The algorithm positions the boundaries to minimize the dispersion of values within each stratum, which decreases the effect of population variance. Reducing the variance, or 'spread', reduces the required sample size. By design, the range of each stratum is not uniform. The required number of samples is then calculated on a per-stratum basis, and totaled, rather than on the basis of the entire, unstratified population. For the same set of data, the stratified approach typically results in a much smaller sample size than the unstratified approach.
Pre-stratification using cellsAs part of the stratification process, you specify the number of cells to use to pre-stratify the population. Cells are uniform numeric divisions, and narrower than strata. A statistical algorithm uses the count of the records in each cell as part of the calculation that assigns optimal strata boundaries. Cells are not retained in the final stratified output. At a minimum, the number of specified cells must be twice the number of specified strata.
Note Pre-stratification cells and the cells used in the cell method of sample selection are not the same thing. Too much of a good thingStratification is a powerful tool for managing sample size, but you should exercise care when specifying the number of strata and the number of cells. As a starting point, try:
After a certain point, increasing the number of strata, or the number of cells, has little or no effect on sample size. However, these increases can adversely affect the design of the sample, or the performance of Analytics when stratifying large data sets. Regarding sample design, when you reach the evaluation stage you need to have a minimum number of misstatements in each stratum in order to reliably project misstatements to the entire population. If you have too many strata in relation to the number of misstatements, problems can occur with the projection. The certainty stratumDefining a certainty stratum is another available stratification option. Using a certainty stratum has two benefits:
Defining a certainty stratumTo define a certainty stratum, you specify a numeric cutoff value. All key-field book values greater than or equal to the cutoff value are automatically selected and included in the sample. The remainder of the population is sampled using the random selection method.
Note The lower you set the certainty stratum cutoff value, the more you increase the overall sample size. You should avoid setting the cutoff value unnecessarily low. Consult a sampling specialist if you are unsure where to set the value. Top and bottom certainty strataThe certainty stratum option in Analytics defines a top certainty stratum only. Numbers greater than or equal to the cutoff value are included in the certainty stratum. You may also want a bottom certainty stratum, to automatically include large negative values in the sample, and to reduce variance. To create a bottom certainty stratum, you can use either of the following methods:
How classical variables sampling selects recordsClassical variables sampling uses the following process for selecting sample records from an Analytics table:
ExampleIn a table with 300 records, divided into 3 strata, Analytics could select the following record numbers:
In an unstratified table with 300 records Analytics could select the record numbers displayed below. You can see that the selected record numbers are less evenly distributed. Note The record numbers below are grouped in three columns for ease of comparison, but the columns do not represent strata.
Unbiased sample selectionClassical variables sampling is unbiased and it is not based on the amounts contained in a record. Each record has an equal chance of being selected for inclusion in the sample. A record containing a $1000 amount, a record containing a $250 amount, and a record containing a $1 amount all have the same chance of being selected. In other words, the probability that any given record will be selected has no relation to the size of the amount it contains. What is an advantage in using classical variables sampling?Advantages: 1. When the auditor expects a large number of differences between book and audited values, classical variables sampling will normally result in a smaller sample size than monetary-unit sampling. 2. Classical variables sampling techniques are effective for both overstatements and understatements.
Which of the following would most likely be an advantage in using classical variables sampling rather than?Therefore, classical variables sampling would have an advantage over PPS sampling because variables sampling does not require special design considerations for inclusion of zero and negative balances.
What is classical variable sampling?Classical variables sampling is a statistical sampling method for estimating: the total audited value of an account or class of transactions. the total amount of monetary misstatement in an account or class of transactions.
Which of the following is an improper technique when using monetary unit statistical sampling in an audit of accounts receivable?Which of the following would be an improper technique when using monetary-unit statistical sampling in an audit of accounts receivable? Combining negative and positive dollar misstatements in the appraisal of a sample.
|