Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Articles Service

Review

Biotechnology and Bioengineering (BB)  |  Enzyme, Protein Engineering, and Metabolic Engineering

1Division of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Republic of Korea, 2University College, Yonsei University, Incheon 21983, Republic of Korea, 3Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea, 4Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, NJ 08901-8520, USA, 5Department of Systems Biology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea

Received: December 8, 2017; Accepted: May 1, 2018

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 28(7): 1037-1051

Published July 28, 2018 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1712.12017

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Abstract

The genus Rhodococcus is a phylogenetically and catabolically diverse group that has been isolated from diverse environments, including polar and alpine regions, for its versatile ability to degrade a wide variety of natural and synthetic organic compounds. Their metabolic capacity and diversity result from their diverse catabolic genes, which are believed to be obtained through frequent recombination events mediated by large catabolic plasmids. Many rhodococci have been used commercially for the biodegradation of environmental pollutants and for the biocatalytic production of high-value chemicals from low-value materials. Recent studies of their physiology, metabolism, and genome have broadened our knowledge regarding the diverse biotechnological applications that exploit their catabolic enzymes and pathways.

Keywords

Biodegradation, bacteria, degradative pathway, Rhodococcus, catabolic enzyme

Introduction

The genus Rhodococcus is a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse bacterial group within nocardioform actinomycetes, which contain mycolic acid in their cell walls. Rhodococcus (family Nocardiaceae) belongs to the phylum Actinobacteria that includes two other well-known families, Mycobacteriaceae and Corynebacteriaceae. Rhodococcus members are described as nonmotile and aerobic gram-positive bacteria that generally show pleomorphic morphology, depending on the species or growth conditions, such as different growth substrates. They have been isolated from a wide variety of sources, including soil, rocks, groundwater, marine sediments, animal feces, internal organs of insects, and healthy and diseased animals and plants [1]. Recently, cold-adapted rhodococcal strains have been isolated from naturally cold environments, such as alpine areas, the Arctic, and the Antarctic [2-4].

After approximately a decade since the first comprehensive account of the genus Rhodococcus in 1998 (see the special issue of Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, volume 74), an excellent book was published that described the biology of Rhodococcus. According to this book, rhodococci are generally found to be harmless, and some are very attractive biotechnological candidates, although there are rare pathogenic species such as R. equi and R. fascians that cause foal pneumonia and leafy gall disease in plants, respectively. The reasons for their value as promising biotechnological candidates for applications are as follows. The members of Rhodococcus show a remarkable ability to degrade and transform a wide variety of natural organic and xenobiotic compounds via diverse catabolic pathways. In addition to the capacity to metabolize a broad spectrum of chemical compounds, cell tolerance to toxic substrates and solvents, a frequent lack of catabolite repression, the production of biosurfactants, and environmental persistence make them excellent candidates for bioremediation and bioconversion. They also have the potential to synthesize useful products such as valuable chemical synthons, amides, and polymers [1, 5].

The metabolic versatility of Rhodococcus has been extensively studied in microbial biotechnology fields worldwide. Presently, there are over 1,800 and over 3,200 patents retrieved by even a quick search on Google’s patent search engine using “rhodococcus biodegradation” and “rhodococcus biocatalysis,” respectively, as keywords. Several review papers have also described the biotechnological potential of rhodococci cells and their biodegradative enzymes for pollutant removal in environmental biotechnology and for biocatalysis in pharmaceutical and chemical industries [6, 7]. The biodegradation and biocatalysis activities are linked by biotransformation reactions and enzymes that catalyze the reactions. In this review, we will briefly summarize the current knowledge on the biodegradative pathways of Rhodococcus, including a brief collation of selected genomic data. We will then describe examples and strategies for utilizing the real and potential value of biodegradative rhodococci.

Rhodococci as Superb Degraders

As summarized in Table 1, rhodococci display a diverse range of metabolic capabilities and degrade a wide variety of natural organic and xenobiotic compounds, including aliphatic, aromatic (halogenated and nitro-substituted), heterocyclic, and polycyclic aromatic compounds [1], alicyclic hydrocarbons [8], nitriles [5], cholesterol [9], and lignins [10]. The wide range of substrates metabolized by rhodococci suggests that members of this genus are comparable to pseudomonads in their biotechnological applications. The biodegradative pathways in rhodococci generally consist of many peripheral (upper) pathways and a few central (lower) pathways. For example, in the case of aromatic hydrocarbons, a wide range of monooxygenases and dioxygenases in the peripheral pathways initiate the oxidative attack of the aromatic ring, producing central intermediates such as catechol, protocatechuate, and gentisate, which are further degraded by the ortho-, meta-, or modified 3-oxoadipate routes to intermediates of the citric acid cycle.

Table 1 . Members of the genus Rhodococcus that possess biocatalytic enzymes and/or biodegradative pathways for representative organic compounds.

Strain nameIsolation sourceDegradation substrateApplication fieldKey pathway or enzymeReference for isolation
R. rhodochrous J1 Soil sample Benzonitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [72]
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil in Moscow, Russia 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol Remediation of (chloro)aromatics Modified ortho-cleavage pathway for chlorocatechols [73]
R. rhodochrous PA-34 Soil sample Propionitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [74]
R. erythropolis TA421 Dry wood termites, Japan Biphenyl Remediation of organic pollutants Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [75]
R. erythropolis BD2 Trichloroethene and toluene contaminated soil Isopropylbenzene Remediation of trichloroethene Isopropylbenzene-degrading genes (ipb) [12]
Rhodococcus sp. AJ270 Air-dried soil from an industrial site, UK Acetonitrile, hetero-aromatic nitriles Remediation of acrylonitrile Nitrile hydratase and amidase [76]
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil, Japan Polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes Remediation of organic pollutants; vanillin production Biphenyl- and ethylbenzene-degrading genes (bph and etb); dye-decolorizing peroxidase (dypB) [77]
Rhodococcus sp. T104 Plant-amended soil Biphenyl, terpenes Remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [78]
Rhodococcus sp. B-264-1 Oil-contaminated soil, the USA Toluene Production of cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol Toluene dioxygenase (todC1C2BA) [79]
Rhodococcus sp. strain Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica n-Alkanes, biphenyl Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [80]
R. opacus PWD4 Topsoil in Hilversum, The Netherlands Toluene Production of trans-carveol Limonene-6-hydroxylase [53]
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil, Korea Alkylbenzenes, phthalates, bicyclics Production of cis-dihydrodiols and catechols o-xylene dioxygenase (akbA1A2A3) and cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (akbB) [81]
Rhodococcus sp. NO14-1 Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated alpine soil, Austria Hexadecane, phenol Low-temperature remediation of phenol Phenol-degrading genes [82]
R. opacus B4 Soil in Hiroshima, Japan Benzene, aromatic/aliphatic Remediation of benzene Benzene dioxygenase (bnzA1A2) [83]
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea of the Pacific Ocean Alkanes Remediation of alkanes Alkane-degrading genes (alk) [84]
R. erythropolis MLT1 Soil surrounding hop plants β-myrcene Production of geraniol Unknown enzymatic mechanism [54]
R. ruber TH Nitrile-contaminated soil Acrylonitrile Production of ammonium acrylate Nitrilase [85]
R. ruber AKSH-84 Petroleum-contaminated sludge, India Acetonitrile Production of acrylic acid Nitrilase [42]
Rhodococcus spp. strains Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated North Atlantic Canada n-Hexadecane, diesel Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [86]
R. erythropolis ATCC 25544 Soil Cholesterol, aromatic compounds Production of cholestenone Cholesterol oxidase Unknown

Biodegradative rhodococci often harbor large catabolic linear plasmids, many of which increase their catabolic versatility and efficiency by contributing to multiple pathways and gene homologs. Such plasmids encode multiple catabolic enzyme systems. Thus, multiple degradative pathways may be involved in the degradation of various organic compounds. Comparative analyses of rhodococcal genomes have suggested that the linear plasmids are possible determinants of the propagation of diverse degradative genes [11]. It is thought that frequent recombination of catabolic genes among bacteria is associated with large plasmids. The hyper recombination contributes to the large number of homologous genes in large genomes, which consequently leads to their catabolic diversity [1]. As representative examples, the highly similar gene clusters for catabolism of aromatic compounds are found on the following three pairs of plasmids: pTA421 from R. erythropolis TA421 and pSP6 from R. globerulus P6, pBD2 from R. erythropolis BD2 [12] and pRHL1 from R. jostii RHA1, and pDK2 from Rhodococcus sp. DK17 and pRHL2 from R. jostii RHA1. In addition to enzyme and pathway multiplicities, different induction mechanisms, substrate specificities, and activities of the catalytic enzymes are thought to contribute to their extraordinary capabilities to metabolize a wide range of compounds.

Since the introduction of the term “megaplasmid” in 1981 to describe a more than 450 kb plasmid from Rhizobium meliloti, there have been many reports on the presence of megaplasmids in different bacteria, which encode the degradation enzymes for various classes of natural and synthetic organic compounds. Table 2 summarizes the brief genome comparisons of biodegradative rhodococci containing catabolic plasmids. These genomes vary in size (5.4–10.1 Mbp) and the number of predicted genes (5,023–9,251). Among the biodegradative rhodococci, R. jostii RHA1 is the most extensively studied strain. RHA1 is a versatile polychlorinated biphenyl degrader, which contains a linear chromosome and three linear megaplasmids (1,120-kb pRHL1, 420-kb pRHL2, and 330-kb pRHL3). Most of the genes of the upper biphenyl catabolic pathway are located mainly on the pRHL1 and pRHL2 plasmids, whereas duplicated phthalate-degrading operons are located on pRHL1 and pRHL2 [13]. Oxygenases genes (203) are exceptionally rich in the RHA1 genome, containing 9,251 predicted protein-encoding genes, many of which are involved in numerous pathways predicted to degrade aromatic compounds (30) or steroids (4) [14]. Another well-studied Rhodococcus strain, DK17, utilizes various alkylbenzenes and phthalates as growth substrates, and also possesses three linear megaplasmids (380-kb pDK1, 330-kb pDK2, and 750-kb pDK3). The genes for alkylbenzene degradation are present in pDK2, whereas the gene clusters for phthalate degradation are duplicated in both pDK2 and pDK3. Duplicated phthalate-degrading operons are equally functional, allowing DK17 to achieve the maximal degradation of phthalate [15]. In addition, it is noteworthy that the phthalate degradation pathway is completely inhibited by benzoate in DK17 [16].

Table 2 . Brief genome statistics of Rhodococcus strains possessing catabolic plasmids.a

Strain nameIsolation source (degrading substances)Genome size, Mb (GC%)Total gene countTotal protein countNumber of plasmidNCBI BioProject ID
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil (polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes) 9.71 (66.94) 9,251 8,695 3 PRJNA 13693
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea (alkanes) 6.90 (62.29) 6,428 6,278 3 PRJDA 20395
R. opacus B4 Soil (aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons) 8.83 (67.63) 8,048 7,780 5 PRJDA 34839
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil (alkylbenzenes, bicyclics, phthalates) 9.11 (67.10) 8,609 7,954 3 PRJNA 157361
R. aetherivorans BCP1 Aerobic butane-utilizing consortium (alkanes) 6.23 (70.29) 5,644 5,478 2 PRJNA 213668
R. pyridinivorans SB3094 Diesel waste site (butanone) 5.59 (67.81) 5,094 4,916 2 PRJNA 231235
R. opacus R7 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated site (naphthalene, o-xylene) 10.12 (67.02) 8,621 8,357 5 PRJNA 246296
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil (chloroaromatics) 8.64 (67.03) 7,608 7,420 2 PRJNA 253567
Rhodococcus sp. p52 Oil-polluted soil (dioxin) 5.41 (67.85) 5,023 4,801 3 PRJNA 255270
Rhodococcus sp. AD45 Freshwater sediment (isoprene) 6.79 (61.74) 6,202 6,048 2 PRJNA 272922

aBased on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome information accessed in mid-May 2017.


The genomic features of R. jostii RHA1 and Rhodococcus sp. DK17 were compared to study basic genetic similarities and differences between the two strains. A comparative protein-protein BLAST analysis (BLASTp) showed that approximately 75% of open-reading frames (ORFs) from the two strains, including ones for the degradation of aromatics, share >90% identity. Almost identical phthalate operons duplicated on two separate catabolic megaplasmids were also present in the RHA1 genome as in DK17. The DK17-specific ORFs are not randomly distributed over the genome, but occur in groups or clusters. Analyses of the DK17-specific ORFs indicated that many encoded proteins are likely to be involved in the transport of organic molecules, such as aromatic hydrocarbons [17]. This is consistent with the recent genomic discovery that biodegradative rhodococci are well-equipped with genes for the transport of many different substrates [18].

Metabolic Pathways for o-Xylene Degradation as a Representative Example

Most o-xylenes are produced by cracking petroleum and largely used in the production of phthalic anhydride, which is a precursor to many materials, drugs, and other chemicals. Thus, it is a widespread environmental pollutant in groundwater and soil. Although bacteria capable of degrading m-xylene or p-xylene under aerobic conditions are common, bacteria capable of degrading o-xylene are less frequently reported. Thus, o-xylene is considered to be difficult to biologically degrade and only a few bacteria have been studied for the ability to degrade o-xylene. Five different possible metabolic pathways for o-xylene degradation were proposed (Fig. 1), three of which have been experimentally confirmed from Rhodococcus spp. until recently. Rhodococcus sp. DK17 and Rhodococcus sp. C125 (originally Corynebacterium sp. C125) metabolize o-xylene through an aromatic ring dioxygenation to form o-xylene cis -3,4-dihydrodiol (1,2-dihydoxy-3,4-dimethylcyclohexa-3,5-diene), which is converted to 3,4-dimethylcatechol by a dehydrogenation reaction. Rhodococcus sp. B3 and R. opacus R7 degrade o-xylene through two successive monooxygenation reactions of the aromatic ring to form 2,3-dimethylphenol and 3,4-dimethylcatechol. In Rhodococcus sp. B3, a methyl monooxygenation reaction operates simultaneously that oxidizes a methyl group of o-xylene to form 2-methylbenzyl alcohol, which is metabolized to form 3-methylcatechol via 2-methylbenzoic acid. The methyl monooxygenation pathway functions for o-xylene degradation in R. opacus TKN14, from which the genes (nidABEF) for methyl group hydroxylation have been identified and characterized [19]. The central intermediates (dimethyl or monomethyl catechols) are further degraded by ortho- or meta-ring cleavage to intermediates of the citric acid cycle.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Fig. 1.o-Xylene degradation pathways operating in Rhodococcus spp. isolates.

An approximately 25-kb-size gene cluster for o-xylene degradation by Rhodococcus sp. DK17 is present on the 330-kb pDK2 (Fig. 2). The cluster contains the genes encoding o-xylene dioxygenase: large and small subunits of the oxygenase component, which are present in two copies 6 kb apart from each other (akbA1a-akbA2a and akbA1b-akbA2b), a gene for the ferredoxin component (akbA3), and a gene for the ferredoxin reductase component (akbA4). When expressed in Escherichia coli, recombinant AkbA1a-AkbA2a-AkbA3 transformed o-xylene into o-xylene cis-3,4-dihydrodiol. Moreover, a gene encoding cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (akbB) and akbCDEF genes for a complete meta-cleavage pathway (meta-cleavage dioxygenase (AkbC), hydrolase (AkbD), hydratase (AkbE), and aldolase (AkbF)) are present in the cluster. AkbBCDEF are thought to completely metabolize the intermediate cis-3,4-dihydrodiol produced by o-xylene dioxygenase [20]. Two-component regulatory genes (akbS and akbT ) are detected near the o-xylene-degrading operon, which are required to induce the expression of o-xylene dioxygenase [21].

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Fig. 2. Gene organization on the 330-kb pDK2 in Rhodococcus sp. DK17 (A), and proposed metabolic pathway for o-xylene degradation by DK17 (B). The direction of transcription is indicated by arrowheads.

Application of Targeted Biodegradative Pathways

Biodegradation

Many alkyl- and hydroxyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons and nitriles are released into the environment by industrial activity, whereas some are natural products. Most aromatic hydrocarbons and nitriles are highly toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic. Microorganisms and their degradative pathways have been examined and used in an ecologically favorable process for the biodegradation of various pollutants at contaminated sites. The degradative capacities of aerobic rhodococci are of particular relevance for the bioremediation of organic pollutants derived from the constituents and halogenated products of petroleum. Indeed, there have been many studies involving the biological removal of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, chlorobenzene, phenol, o-xylene, naphthalene, and n-alkanes, using Rhodococcus strains that grew in extraordinarily high concentrations of pollutants and/or metabolized them at high degradative rates [22, 23].

As mentioned above, it has been examined if the rhodococcal strains with o-xylene degradation ability are able to remove o-xylene at a small scale in a laboratory and then be exploited for in situ o-xylene removal in natural environments where the strains were originally isolated. A laboratory-scale biofilter inoculated with o-xylene degrading Rhodococcus sp. BTO62 maintained more than 90% removal efficiency of o-xylene (41 g/m3/h) under sterile condition and the efficiency was enhanced to 160 g/m3/h under nonsterile condition. This indicates the possibility that o-xylene and its degradation intermediates are co-metabolized by BTO62 and other contaminant microorganisms in the biofilter [24]. When co-inoculated with m- and p-xylene-degrading Pseudomonas sp. NBM21, BTO62 was able to remove a mixture of o-, m-, and p-xylenes at an elimination capacity of 180 g/m3/h at 20°C under nonsterile conditions [25]. Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 possesses two well-known degradative gene clusters for biphenyl (bph) and o-xylene (homologous to DK17 akb) degradation. RHA1 was used, together with the bacterium Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 carrying adequate operons for chlorinated benzoate and biphenyl degradation, for sediment microcosms contaminated with a mixture of structurally similar compounds of polychlorinated biphenyls [26]. Rhodococcal cells immobilized in agar or synthetic polymers were also used for the bioremediation of acrylonitrile and toxic amides. Bioaugmentation application of Rhodococcus sp. AJ270 pure culture resulted in the same level of acrylonitrile degradation in the sterilized topsoil as that achieved by whole indigenous bacterial flora in unsterilized control soil [27].

Plant essential oils are abundant, inexpensive, and usually considered nontoxic to humans. Components in these oils have been reported both to stimulate bacterial cell growth and induce catalytic enzymes in their degradative pathways, resulting in higher degradation rates for biphenyl, polychlorinated biphenyls, and trichloroethylene (TCE). For example, the component limonene in orange peels was able to induce the biphenyl degradation pathway in limonene-degrading Rhodococcus sp. T104 [28]. The induction ability of these essential oil components is probably due to the similarity between their chemical structures and the pollutants. Thus, these essential oils or plant materials may be used as a cost-effective bioremediation strategy to stimulate environmental pollutant degradation. When induced by cumin aldehyde and cumene (two components in cumin oil), toluene-degrading Rhodococcus sp. L4 was capable of cometabolic degradation of TCE, with the degradation efficiency being similar to toluene grown cells (57 ± 5% of the initial TCE concentration of 80 μM) [29]. To overcome the need for the repeated addition of inducing substrates to maintain TCE degradation activity, Rhodococcus sp. L4 was immobilized on cumin seeds as plant-immobilizing materials containing cumin aldehyde and cumene. The immobilized organisms tolerated up to 68 μM TCE and continuously degraded TCE, demonstrating that rhodococcal immobilization on plant materials rich in essential oils is a promising method for efficient TCE cometabolic degradation [30].

Even naturally cold environments such as alpine areas and Arctic and Antarctic regions are known to be contaminated with various aromatic and aliphatic compounds. Oil spillage is one of the main concerns, and the petroleum-derived contaminants are generally thought to be persistent in the environment owing to their toxic effects on indigenous microbes and the low temperatures, which limit the rates of microbial degradative processes. However, cold-adapted bacteria play a key role in in situ biodegradation in the cold environments, and their degradative activities and community composition shifts have been extensively studied [31]. Thus, the psychrotolerant and/or psychrophilic bacteria have been characterized as useful tools for low-temperature bioremediation of the environmental contaminants [32, 33]. Rhodococcus members from hydrocarbon-contaminated sites are commonly recognized for their high ability in petroleum hydrocarbon degradation. Several studies have reported the use of indigenous rhodococci to degrade phenolic pollutants in cold environments. Cold-adapted R. erythropolis BZ4 from alpine soil was able to degrade high amounts of phenol (0.7 g/l) at as low a temperature as 15°C [34]. Rhodococcus sp. AQ5-07 from Antarctic soil was capable of completely degrading 0.5 g/l phenol within 120 h at 10°C at the laboratory scale [35].

Biocatalysis

The generation of high-value chemicals from abundant and low-value renewable organic materials using microbial and/or enzymatic biocatalysts is an area of great interest to microbiologists and organic chemists. Biocatalysts are usually more effective than the use of traditional chemical methods, because they metabolize under mild conditions, with high specificity and stereoselectivity, which are needed in the (agro)chemical and the pharmaceutical industries. As shown in a representative review for the biocatalytic application of rhodococcal enzymes, Rhodococcus erythropolis contains a large number of enzymes that are involved in many diverse reactions in bioconversion and degradation processes, such as oxidations, dehydrogenations, epoxidations, hydrolysis, hydroxylations, dehalogenations, and desulfurizations [36]. Several representative bioconversion reactions by catalytic enzymes from Rhodococcus spp. strains are depicted in Fig. 3 and described in detail in the subsections below.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Fig. 3. Representative bioconversion reactions by catalytic enzymes from Rhodococcus spp. strains.

Aromatic compounds. Oxygenases are defined as enzymes that catalyze the specific introduction of one (monooxygenase) or two (dioxygenase) oxygen atoms into the substrate. Aromatic dioxygenases have attracted interest for their potential application as biocatalysts for the regioselective and enantioselective synthesis of vicinal cis-dihydrodiols and their dehydrogenation product catechols [37]. As a result of the demand for chiral intermediates, dehydrogenases have also been used for the production of chiral compounds, such as substituted catechols. For example, the naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase enzyme has been used for the production of catechol-like metabolites in biotransformation studies.

The o-xylene dioxygenase from Rhodococcus sp. DK17 possesses the unique ability to perform specific regioselective hydroxylations, depending on the size and position of the substituent groups on the aromatic ring [38]. Molecular modeling studies predicted that the substrate-binding pocket of the DK17 o-xylene dioxygenase is large enough to accommodate bicyclics, and can be divided into three regions (distal, central, and proximal), where hydrophobic interactions in the distal position may be important in substrate binding. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis studies combined with metabolite analyses confirmed these predictions, and further showed that different positioning of substrates in the active site of the enzyme resulted in the generation of different products. For example, DK17 transformed toluene and ethylbenzene into two different cis-dihydrodiols that resulted from an oxidation at the 2,3 and the 3,4 positions on the aromatic ring, whereas it transformed all of the larger substrates tested (biphenyl, naphthalene, indan, tetralin, indene, and 1,2-dihydronaphthalene) exclusively into each corresponding cis-dihydrodiol [8]. Moreover, when expressed in Escherichia coli, the o-xylene dioxygenase (AkbA1A2A3) was able to transform tetralin, indene, and 1,2-dihydronaphthalene into each corresponding cis-dihydrodiol (tetralin cis-dihydrodiol, indan-1,2-diol, and cis-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, respectively) [8]. These bioconversion studies suggested that the DK17 cells or recombinant o-xylene dioxygenase, with the capability for aromatic and alicyclic hydroxylation of indan derivatives, could be used as a promising biocatalyst for the development of new chemicals (Fig. 4).

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Fig. 4. Regioselective oxidation of monocyclics and bicyclics by Rhodococcus sp. DK17 o-xylene dioxygenase. The oxidation product(s) from each substrate are as follows: 1, o-xylene; 2, 1,2-dihydroxy-3,4-dimethylcyclohexa-3,5-diene; 3, toluene; 4, cis-2,3- toluene dihydrodiol; 5, cis-3,4-toluene dihydrodiol; 6, ethylbenzene; 7, cis-2,3-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 8, cis-3,4-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 9, indan; 10, cis-indan-4,5-dihydrodiol; 11, tetralin; 12, tetralin cis-dihydrodiol; 13, m -xylene; 14, 3-methylbenzyl alcohol; 15, 2,4-dimethylphenol; 16, p-xylene; 17, cis-p-xylene dihydrodiol; 18, biphenyl; 19, cis-2,3-bipheyl dihydrodiol; 20, naphthalene; 21, cis-1,2-naphthalene dihydrodiol; 22, indene; 23, indan-1,2-diol; 24, 1,2-dihydronaphthalene; 25, cis-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene. The left and right panels show growth and non-growth substrates of DK17, respectively.

Indan and its derivatives are frequently used as starting materials for the preparation of synthons for pharmaceutical and fine chemical synthesis. Rhodococcus sp. I24, possessing a toluene dioxygenase, was capable of transforming indene to cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol, a potential precursor to (−)-cis- (1S,2R)-1-aminoindan-2-ol, a key chiral synthon for indinavir, an HIV protease inhibitor [39]. When scaled up in a 14-L bioreactor, Rhodococcus sp. B-264-1 produced 2,000 mg/l of cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol (an enantiometric excess > 99%) and yielded up to 4,000 mg/l in process development studies. In addition to the oxidation of indene to cis-(1S,2R)- indandiol, indan and tetralin were transformed to a variety of indandiols for chiral drugs by enantioselective benzylic microbial hydroxylation [38]. Research has also been performed to obtain patentable melatonin receptor ligands, including synthesis of tricyclic indan derivatives for the development of new melatonin receptor agonists [40].

Nitriles. Nitriles are organic compounds that have a −C≡N functional group. They are common environmental pollutants. Rhodococci have been shown to degrade and bioconvert a wide range of nitriles. The hydrolysis of nitrile to the corresponding carboxylic acid is catalyzed by a nitrilase or by the successive actions of a nitrile hydratase (NHase) and an amidase, which metabolizes the intermediate amide to carboxylic acid. Thus, the nitrile-converting enzymes, nitrilase and NHase, are responsible for the bioconversion of a wide variety of structurally different nitriles. The bioconversion of acrylonitrile has become attractive because of its industrial applicability in acrylamide production. Acrylamide can be prepared by the hydrolysis of acrylonitrile by NHase. This is beneficial in acrylamide production because nitrile-hydrating whole-cell biocatalysts generally exhibit low or no amidase activity for acrylamide.

Because of progress in understanding microbial nitrile metabolism, NHases from Rhodococcus sp. N-774 and R. rhodochrous J1 have been used in the kiloton-scale production of acrylamide, which is known as one of the most commercially successful microbial biotransformations. The polyacrylamide-entrapped resting cells of R. rhodochrous PA-34 produced a total of 1,217 g/l acrylamide in a partitioned fed-batch reactor recycling the entrapped cells [41]. Rhodococci with nitrilase activity was also used to convert acrylonitrile into acrylic acid, which is traditionally used for the production of diverse acrylic esters in many industries. A versatile acrylonitrile-bioconverting R. ruber AKSH-84 was studied for optimization of medium and biotransformation conditions for acrylic acid production [42]. R. ruber TH, expressing NHase, amidase, and nitrilase, was transformed to a NHase-amidase double-knockout mutant, and the resultant mutant, which was still able to express nitrilase at extremely low level, was subsequently engineered to overexpress a heterologous nitrilase from R. rhodochrous tg1-A6 with a high activity of nitrilase. When the engineered cells expressing two nitrilases were used as a catalyst at room temperature, the amount and productivity of ammonium acrylate increased to 741.0 g/l and 344.9 g/l/h, respectively, which were the highest values reported to date [43].

Lignin polymer. Large amounts of small molecular aromatic compounds originate from decaying plant material containing (hemi) cellulose and lignin (a complex aromatic heteropolymer). In addition to natural lignin, large quantities of kraft lignin are formed in the pulp industry. Thus, lignin degradation products are of considerable interest as a renewable source of high-value aromatic compounds and other lignin-derived products [44]. Lignin is composed of phenylpropanoid aryl-C3 units (guaiacyl, syringyl, and p-hydroxyphenyl), linked together via a variety of ether and C-C bonds. The most common chemical linkage found in lignin is the β-aryl ether, accounting for 45–50% and 60% of the units in softwoods and hardwoods, respectively [45]. When these linkages are broken, a wide range of ligninderived low-molecular phenolic compounds are produced [46].

R. jostii RHA1 was intensively characterized for its degradation properties of aromatic compounds (especially, polychlorinated biphenyl and alkylbenzenes) using its catalytic enzymes and pathways. RHA1 was later shown to break down lignin and lignocellulose. In RHA1, lignin degradation is proposed to be initiated by an extracellular dye-decolorizing peroxidase B (DypB), resulting in vanillin as a main intermediate. Vanillin is further catabolized to vanillate and then protocatechuate by the activities of vanillin dehydrogenase (Vdh) and vanillate O-demethylase (VanAB), respectively, which is subjected to intradiol oxidative ring cleavage. Recombinant DypB was shown to recognize the β-aryl ether structure and cleave the Cα-Cβ bond in β-aryl ether lignin model compounds, producing vanillin, a valuable chemical for food flavoring. DypB also showed linkage cleavage activity for kraft lignins and wheat straw lignocellulose [47]. Interestingly, when encapsulated with encapsulin protein from RHA1, the assembled complex DypB showed an 8-fold enhanced lignin degradation activity, when compared with DypB alone [48]. A vdh gene deletion mutant of RHA1, when grown on minimal medium containing 2.5% wheat straw lignocellulose and 0.05% glucose, accumulated vanillin (96 mg/l after 6 days) [10]. Natural vanillin production is of intense interest to the flavor and fragrance industry.

Terpenes and terpenoids. Terpenes, composed of isoprene units, are a large and diverse class of organic compounds produced by a variety of plants. They are used in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology industries. Terpenoids (isoprenoids) are known as modified terpenes involving methyl groups that have been moved or removed, or added oxygen atoms, thus containing additional functional groups. Terpenes and terpenoids are the primary constituents of plant and flower essential oils, and are widely used as fragrances and flavors in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Synthetic variations and derivatives of natural terpenes and terpenoids also greatly expand the variety of aromas used in perfumery and flavors used as food additives. Monoterpenes are branched-chain C10 hydrocarbons with two isoprene units that are widely distributed in nature, with more than 400 different monoterpenes identified. Thus, bacteria with the ability to degrade monoterpenes are relatively common, and a degradation pathway via initial oxidation of the benzylic methyl group has been extensively studied at the biochemical and genetic levels. For example, in the cases of p-cymene and limonene, the initial oxidation of the benzylic methyl groups of monoterpenes was performed by a monooxygenase, producing corresponding alcohols that were oxidized to aldehydes and then acids by respective dehydrogenases. The further degradation of those acidic intermediates was processed through lower degradation pathways [49].

Limonene, a monocyclic monoterpene, is the main constituent of orange and lemon peel oil (92–96%), which is a byproduct of the fruit juice industry, and is present in a mixture of both enantiomers (4R)-limonene and (4S)-limonene. In plants, the terpenoid carvone is biosynthesized via ring hydroxylation of limonene to carveol, the hydroxyl group of which is subsequently oxidized to ketone, resulting in carvone. There have been many reports concerning the biotransformation by microorganisms of low-priced limonene to more valuable naturally flavored monoterpenoids such as carveol and carvone. Carveol and carvone are widely used in the flavor and fragrance industries. Carveol also has chemopreventive potential for mammary carcinogenesis with little or no toxicity. Oils containing carvones are used in aromatherapy and alternative medicine.

R. erythropolis DCL14, which is able to grow on limonene and limonene derivatives such as carveol and carvone, was reported to metabolize limonene via an initial attack at the 1,2 double bond by monooxygenase, leading to limonene-1,2-epoxide. Limonene-1,2-epoxide is converted to limonene-1,2-diol by limonene epoxide hydrolase activity [50]. DCL14 also metabolized all four stereoisomers of carveol via oxidation by carveol dehydrogenase to two carvone enantiomers [51]. In a laboratory-scale aqueous/organic system, using an air-driven column reactor, DCL14 whole cells biotransformed carveol (a mixture of isomers) to carvone (0.68 g carvone/g carveol) [52]. The chemostat-grown cells of toluene-degrading R. opacus PWD4 were able to hydroxylate (4R)-limonene (D-limonene) to enantiomerically pure trans-carveol, with a final yield of 94–97%. Another toluene degrader (R. globerulus PWD8) oxidized most of the formed trans-carveol to (4R)-carvone, which is used as a flavor compound [53]. As another example of the use of rhodococcal microbial or enzymatic catalysis, although the chemical-enzymatic mechanism is presently unclear, the resting cells of R. erythropolis MLT1 converted the monoterpene β-myrcene to geraniol, which has a rose-like scent and is commonly used in perfumes. A scalable process for geraniol production is being developed [54].

Cholesterol. Steroids are organic compounds composed of four fused rings (three six-member cyclohexane rings A, B, and C; and one five-member cyclopentane ring D). Steroids vary by the functional groups attached to this four-ring core and by the oxidation state of the rings. As an example, cholesterol, having a hydroxyl group attached at position C-3 in ring A, is an important component of cell membranes and is biosynthesized by all animal cells and even by plants in very small amounts. Cholesterol is a major starting material for the production of steroid drugs and hormones, because of the low cost and ease of transformation [9]. Microorganisms capable of degrading cholesterol as a common carbon source have been used to promote selective removal of steroid side chains, while leaving the steroid rings intact [55].

Degradation of the cholesterol rings is initiated by either an NAD+-dependent 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase or cholesterol oxidase, depending on the strain [56]. The side chain degradation is initiated by a cytochrome P450 that catalyzes the oxidation of C26 to the corresponding carboxylic acid, and side chain removal proceeds via a mechanism similar to the β-oxidation of fatty acids. However, it is not clear whether the side chain and ring degradation processes occur simultaneously or independently [9]. In the case of R. jostii RHA1, the reaction product of the side chain removal and initial ring oxidation (4-androstene-3,17-dione) is metabolized to 1,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione, which is later subjected to successive B and A ring cleavages by a nonenzymatic reaction and an extradiol dioxygenase (HsaC enzyme), respectively [57]. All the rhodococci genes presently sequenced are predicted to encode this pathway, suggesting that cholesterol degradation is a common characteristic of this genus [9]. Bioconversion of steroids has been applied to resting cells in aqueous/organic solvents in two-phase systems [58]. Because the oxidation of cholesterol to cholestenone (cholest-4-en-3-one) by cholesterol oxidase is the first step of ring oxidation in microbial degradation, cholestenone production by cholesterol oxidase-producing rhodococci cells was investigated as a model system for the bioconversion of steroids. A systematic investigation for efficient biotransformation of cholesterol to cholestenone was performed with cell-linked and extracellular cholesterol oxidases from R. erythropolis ATCC 25544 [59].

Concluding Remarks

Over the past decade, bioinformatics has been integrated with biodegradation and biocatalysis to produce new research tools useful in databases [60-62]. With online databases linking genomic information, such as UM-BBD (http://umbbd.msi.umn.edu/) and KEGG (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/), the functions of genes within these genomic sequences can be assigned, and biocatalytic reactions and biodegradation pathways can be predicted [63, 64]. These pathway prediction systems allow prediction of the degradation pathways and identification of the enzymes involved in the degradation pathways.

As of mid-May 2017, a total of 226 rhodococci genome sequences have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (USA). These sequences can be used for genome-scale comparisons of the genetic relatedness among rhodococcal strains and metabolic characteristics involving pathways, reactions, catalytic enzymes, and metabolites. Genomic analyses of Rhodococcus strains have already provided insights into their biotechnological potentials and ecological roles [65, 66]. As stated by Arora and Bae [67], bioinformatics and biodegradation are two critical scientific fields in applied microbiology and biotechnology. In this context, the cutting-edge “omics” technology, combined with genetic engineering tools, can exploit extensively the potential of biodegradative rhodococci to develop new approaches for biodegradation and biocatalysis. The concept of “from genomics to metabolomics” has already been successfully applied to biodegradation and biocatalysis [68, 69]. This approach would also be very useful for developing strategies to harness the real and potential value of biodegradative rhodococci (Fig. 5).

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Fig. 5. Schematic illustration of Rhodococcus biodegradative pathways and omics technology outline.

The catabolic enzymes specifically adapted to low temperatures (cold-active enzymes) are thought to be a product from cold adaptation mechanisms used by microorganisms. The cold-active enzymes from cold-adapted microbes show high catalytic activities at low temperatures, which makes them excellent biocatalysts in biotechnological and industrial applications. However, few reports have been published about rhodococcal cold-active enzymes, in spite of their biotechnological potential [70, 71]. Thus, the isolation and characterization of novel cold-active enzymes, such as esterase, protease, lipase, cellulase, and peroxidase, from rhodococci inhabiting different cold environments (polar marine, soil, and glacier) should be an important research subject in the near future.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by “Modeling responses of terrestrial organisms to environmental changes on King George Island” (Grant No. PE18090), funded by the Korea Polar Research Institute. We thank Yoo-Min An for the illustration.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CC. 2006. Biodegradation by members of the genus

    Rhodococcus

    : biochemistry, physiology, and genetic adaptation.

    Adv. Appl. Microbiol.59

    : 1-29.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  2. Hwang CY, Lee I, Cho Y, Lee YM, Baek K, Jung YJ,

    et al

    . 2015.

    Rhodococcus

    aerolatus sp. nov., isolated from subarctic rainwater.

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.65

    : 465-471.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  3. Goordial J, Raymond-Bouchard I, Zolotarov Y, de Bethencourt L, Ronholm J, Shapiro N,

    et al

    . 2016. Cold adaptive traits revealed by comparative genomic analysis of the eurypsychrophile

    Rhodococcus

    sp. JG3 i solated f rom high elevation McMurdo Dry Valley permafrost, Antarctica.

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.92

    : fiv154.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  4. Sinha RK, Krishnan KP, Hatha AA, Rahiman M, Thresyamma DD, Kerkar S. 2017. Divers ity of retrievable heterotrophic bacteria in Kongsfjorden, an Arctic fjord.

    Braz. J. Microbiol.48

    : 51-61.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  5. Martínková L, Uhnáková B, Pátek M, Nesvera J, Kren V. 2009. Biodegradation potential of the genus

    Rhodococcus

    .

    Environ. Int.35

    : 162-177.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  6. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CC. 2005. Biodegradation and

    Rhodococcus

    - masters of catabolic versatility.

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.16

    : 282-290.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  7. Singh R, Sharma R, Tewari N, Geetanjali, Rawat DS. 2006. Nitrilase and its application as a 'green' catalyst.

    Chem. Biodivers.3

    : 1279-1287.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  8. Kim D, Yoo M, Choi KY, Kang BS, Kim TK, Hong SG,

    et al

    . 2011. Differential degradation of bicyclics with aromatic and alicyclic rings by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77

    : 8280-8287.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  9. Yam KC, Okamoto S, Roberts JN, Eltis LD. 2011. Adventures in

    Rhodococcus

    - from steroids to explosives.

    Can. J. Microbiol.57

    : 155-168.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  10. Sainsbury PD, Hardiman EM, Ahmad M, Otani H, Seghezzi N, Eltis LD,

    et al

    . 2013. Breaking down lignin to high-value chemicals: the conversion of lignocellulose to vanillin in a gene deletion mutant of

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1.

    ACS Chem. Biol.8

    : 2151-2156.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  11. Warren R, Hsiao WW, Kudo H, Myhre M, Dosanjh M, Petrescu A,

    et al

    . 2004. Functional characterization of a catabolic plasmid from polychlorinated-biphenyl-degrading

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1.

    J. Bacteriol.186

    : 7783-7795.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  12. Dabrock B, Kesseler M, Averhoff B, Gottschalk G. 1994. Identification and characterization of a transmissible linear plasmid from

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    BD2 that encodes isopropylbenzene and trichloroethene catabolism.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.60

    : 853-860.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  13. Patrauchan MA, Florizone C, Dosanjh M, Mohn WW, Davies J, Eltis LD. 2005. Catabolism of benzoate and phthalate in

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1: redundancies and convergence.

    J. Bacteriol.187

    : 4050-4063.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  14. McLeod MP, Warren RL, Hsiao WW, Araki N, Myhre M, Fernandes C,

    et al

    . 2006. The complete genome of

    Rhodococcus

    sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103

    : 15582-15587.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  15. Choi KY, Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2007. Requirement of duplicated operons for maximal metabolism of phthalate by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.357

    : 766-771.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  16. Choi KY, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2007. Benzoate catabolite repression of the phthalate degradation pathway in

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73

    : 1370-1374.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  17. Yoo M, Kim D, Choi KY, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2012. Draft genome sequence and comparative analysis of the superb aromatic-hydrocarbon degrader

    Rhodococcus

    sp. s train DK17.

    J. Bacteriol.194

    : 4440.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  18. de Carvalho CC, Costa SS, Fernandes P, Couto I, Viveiros M. 2014. Membrane transport systems and the biodegradation potential and pathogenicity of genus

    Rhodococcus

    .

    Front Physiol.5

    : 133.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  19. Maruyama T, Ishikura M, Taki H, Shindo K, Kasai H, Haga M,

    et al

    . 2005. Isolation and characterization of

    o

    -xylene oxygenase genes from

    Rhodococcus opacus

    TKN14.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71

    : 7705-7715.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  20. Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim YS, Kim SK, Nam MH,

    et al

    . 2004. Identification of a novel dioxygenase involved in metabolism of

    o

    -xylene, toluene, and ethylbenzene by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. s train DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70

    : 7086-7092.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  21. Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Sohn HY, Kwon GS, Kim E. 2005. Identification of two-component regulatory genes involved in

    o

    -xylene degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    J. Microbiol.43

    : 49-53.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  22. Kohyama E, Yoshimura A, Aoshima D, Yoshida T, Kawamoto H, Nagasawa T. 2006. Convenient treatment of acetonitrile-containing wastes using the tandem combination of nitrile hydratase and amidase-producing microorganisms.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.72

    : 600-606.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  23. Paisio CE, Quevedo MR, Talano MA, González PS, Agostini E. 2014. Application of two bacterial strains for wastewater bioremediation and assessment of phenolics biodegradation.

    Environ. Technol.35

    : 1802-1810.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  24. Jeong E, Hirai M, Shoda M. 2008. Removal of

    o

    -xylene using biofilter inoculated with

    Rhodococcus

    sp. BTO62.

    J. Hazard. Mater.152

    : 140-147.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  25. Jeong E, Hirai M, Shoda M. 2009. Removal of xylene by a mixed culture of Pseudomonas sp. NBM21 and

    Rhodococcus

    sp. BTO62 in biofilter.

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.108

    : 136-141.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  26. Rodrigues JL, Kachel CA, Aiello MR, Quensen JF, Maltseva OV, Tsoi TV,

    et al

    . 2006. Degradation of aroclor 1242 dechlorination products in sediments by

    Burkholderia xenovorans

    LB400 (

    ohb

    ) and

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1 (

    fcb

    ).

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72

    : 2476-2482.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  27. Baxter J, Garton NJ, Cummings SP. 2006. The impact of acrylonitrile and bioaugmentation on the biodegradation activity and bacterial community structure of topsoil.

    Folia Microbiol.51

    : 591-597.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  28. Kim D, Park MJ, Koh SC, So JS, Kim E. 2002. Three separate pathways for the initial oxidation of limonene, biphenyl, and phenol by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain T104.

    J. Microbiol.40

    : 86-89.

  29. Suttinun O, Müller R, Luepromchai E. 2009. Trichloroethylene cometabolic degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. L4 induced with plant essential oils.

    Biodegradation20

    : 281-291.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  30. Suttinun O, Müller R, Luepromchai E. 2010. Cometabolic degradation of trichloroethene by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain L4 immobilized on plant materials rich in essential oils.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76

    : 4684-4690.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  31. Labbé D, Margesin R, Schinner F, Whyte LG, Greer CW. 2007. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in pristine and hydrocarbon-contaminated Alpine soils.

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.59

    : 466-475.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  32. Margesin R. 2007. Alpine microorganisms: useful tools for low-temperature bioremediation.

    J. Microbiol.45

    : 281-285.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  33. Kim D, Yoo M, Kim E, Hong SG. 2015. Anthranilate degradation by a cold-adapted

    Pseudomonas

    sp.

    J. Basic Microbiol.55

    : 354-362.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  34. Margesin R, Moertelmaier C, Mair J. 2013. Low-temperature biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (

    n

    -alkanes, phenol, anthracene, pyrene) by four actinobacterial strains.

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation84

    : 185-191.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  35. Lee GLY, Ahmad SA, Yasid NA, Zulkharnain A, Convey P, Johari WLW,

    et al

    . 2018. Biodegradation of phenol by coldadapted bacteria from Antarctic soils.

    Polar Biol. 41

    : 553-562.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  36. de Carvalho CC, da Fonseca MM. 2005. The remarkable

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    .

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.67

    : 715-726.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  37. Nolan LC, O'Connor KE. 2008. Dioxygenase- and monooxygenase-catalysed synthesis of

    cis

    -dihydrodiols, catechols, epoxides and other oxygenated products.

    Biotechnol. Lett.30

    : 1879-1891.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  38. Kim D, Yoo M, Choi KY, Kang BS, Kim E. 2013. Characterization and engineering of an

    o

    -xylene dioxygenase for biocatalytic applications.

    Bioresour. Technol.145

    : 123-127.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  39. Priefert H, O'Brien XM, Lessard PA, Dexter AF, Choi EE, Tomic S,

    et al

    . 2004. Indene bioconversion by a toluene inducible dioxygenase of

    Rhodococcus

    sp. I24.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.65

    : 168-176.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  40. Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Poeggeler B, Hardeland R, Cardinali DP. 2007. Drug insight: the use of melatonergic agonists for the treatment of insomnia - focus on ramelteon.

    Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol.3

    : 221-228.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  41. Raj J, Prasad S, Sharma NN, Bhalla TC. 2010. Bioconversion of acrylonitrile to acrylamide using polyacrylamide entrapped cells of

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    PA-34.

    Folia Microbiol.55

    : 442-446.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  42. Kamal A, Kumar MS, Kumar CG, Shaik T. 2011. Bioconversion of acrylonitrile to acrylic acid by

    Rhodococcus ruber

    s train AKSH-84.

    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.21

    : 37-42.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  43. Sun J, Yu H, Chen J, Luo H, Shen Z. 2016. Ammonium acrylate biomanufacturing by an engineered

    Rhodococcus ruber

    with nitrilase overexpression and double-knockout of nitrile hydratase and amidase.

    J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.43

    : 1631-1639.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  44. Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PC, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM. 2010. The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals.

    Chem. Rev.110

    : 3552-3599.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  45. Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. 2011. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi.

    Nat. Prod. Rep.28

    : 1883-1896.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  46. Gellerstedt G. 2015. Softwood kraft lignin: raw material for the future.

    Ind. Crops Prod.77

    : 845-854.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  47. Ahmad M, Roberts JN, Hardiman EM, Singh R, Eltis LD, Bugg TD. 2011. Identification of DypB from

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1 as a lignin peroxidase.

    Biochemistry50

    : 5096-5107.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  48. Rahmanpour R, Bugg TD. 2013. Assembly in vitro of

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1 encapsulin and peroxidase DypB to form a nanocompartment.

    FEBS J. 280

    : 2097-2104.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  49. Bae HW, Kim D, Choi KY, Kwon NR, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ,

    et al

    . 2007. Functional identification of

    p

    -cumate operons in the terpene-degrading

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain T104.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.266

    : 54-59.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  50. De Carvalho CCCR, Van Keulen F, Da Fonseca MMR. 2000. Biotransformation of limonene-1,2-epoxide to limonene-1,2-diol by

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    cells: an introductory approach to selective hydrolysis and product separation.

    Food Technol. Biotechnol.38

    : 181-185.

  51. van der Werf MJ, Boot AM. 2000. Metabolism of carveol and dihydrocarveol in

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    DCL14.

    Microbiology146

    : 1129-1141.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  52. de Carvalho CC, Poretti A, da Fonseca MM. 2005. Cell adaptation to solvent, substrate and product: a successful strategy to overcome product inhibition in a bioconversion system.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.69

    : 268-275.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  53. Duetz WA, Fjällman AH, Ren S, Jourdat C, Witholt B. 2001. Biotransformation of D-limonene to (+)

    trans

    -carveol by toluene-grown

    Rhodococcus opacus

    PWD4 cells.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67

    : 2829-2832.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  54. Thompson ML, Marriott R, Dowle A, Grogan G. 2010. Biotransformation of β-myrcene to geraniol by a strain of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    isolated by selective enrichment from hop plants.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.85

    : 721-730.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  55. García JL, Uhía I, Galán B. 2012. Catabolism and biotechnological applications of cholesterol degrading bacteria.

    Microb. Biotechnol.5

    : 679-699.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  56. Yang X, Dubnau E, Smith I, Sampson NS. 2007. Rv1106c from

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    is a 3 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase.

    Biochemistry46

    : 9058-9067.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  57. Van der Geize R, Yam K, Heuser T, Wilbrink MH, Hara H, Anderton MC,

    et al

    . 2007. A gene cluster encoding cholesterol catabolism in a soil actinomycete provides insight into

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    survival in macrophages.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104

    : 1947-1952.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  58. Fernandes P, Cruz A, Angelova B, Pinheiro HM, Cabral JMS. 2003. Microbial conversion of steroid compounds: recent developments.

    Enzyme Microb. Technol.32

    : 688-705.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  59. Sojo MM, Bru RR, García-Carmona FF. 2002.

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    ATCC 25544 as a suitable source of cholesterol oxidase: cell-linked and extracellular enzyme synthesis, purification and concentration.

    BMC Biotechnol.2

    : 3.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  60. Arora PK, Kumar M, Chauhan A, Raghava GP, Jain RK. 2009. OxDBase: a database of oxygenases involved in biodegradation.

    BMC Res. Notes2

    : 67.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  61. Carbajosa G, Trigo A, Valencia A, Cases I. 2009. Bionemo: molecular information on biodegradation metabolism.

    Nucleic Acids Res.37(Database issue)

    : D598-D602.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  62. Caspi R, Altman T, Dreher K, Fulcher CA, Subhraveti P, Keseler IM,

    et al

    . 2012. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the Bi°Cyc collection of pathway/genome databases.

    Nucleic Acids Res.40(D1)

    : D742-D753.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  63. Ellis LB, Wackett LP. 2012. Use of the University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/biodegradation Database for study of microbial degradation.

    Microb. Inform. Exp.2

    : 1.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  64. Kanehisa M. 2013. Chemical and genomic evolution of enzyme-catalyzed reaction networks.

    FEBS Lett.587

    : 2731-2737.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  65. Fernández de Las Heras L, Perera J, Navarro Llorens JM. 2014. Cholesterol to cholestenone oxidation by ChoG, the main extracellular cholesterol oxidase of

    Rhodococcus ruber

    strain Chol-4.

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.139

    : 33-44.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  66. Khairy H, Meinert C, Wübbeler JH, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Voigt B,

    et al

    . 2016. Genome and proteome analysis of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    MI2: elucidation of the 4,4'-dithiodibutyric acid catabolism.

    PLoS One11

    : e0167539.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  67. Arora PK, Bae H. 2014. Integration of bioinformatics to biodegradation.

    Biol. Proced. Online16

    : 8.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  68. Pérez-Pantoja D, De la Iglesia R, Pieper DH, González B. 2008. Metabolic reconstruction of aromatic compounds degradation from the genome of the amazing pollutantdegrading bacterium

    Cupriavidus necator

    JMP134.

    FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32

    : 736-794.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  69. Romero-Silva MJ, Méndez V, Agulló L, Seeger M. 2013. Genomic and functional analyses of the gentisate and protocatechuate ring-cleavage pathways and related 3-hydroxybenzoate and 4-hydroxybenzoate peripheral pathways in

    Burkholderia xenovorans

    LB400.

    PLoS One8

    : e56038.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  70. De Santi C, Tedesco P, Ambrosino L, Altermark B, Willassen NP, de Pascale D. 2014. A new alkaliphilic coldactive esterase from the psychrophilic marine bacterium

    Rhodococcus

    sp. functional and structural studies and biotechnological potential.

    Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.172

    : 3054-3068.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  71. Santiago M, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, Zamora RA, Parra LP. 2016. Discovery, molecular mechanisms, and industrial applications of cold-active enzymes.

    Front. Microbiol.7

    : 1408.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  72. Nagasawa T, Mathew CD, Mauger J, Yamada H. 1988. Nitrile hydratase-catalyzed production of nicotinamide from 3-cyanopyridine in

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    J1.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.54

    : 1766-1769.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  73. Gorlatov SN, Maltseva OV, Shevchenko VI, Golovleva LA. 1989. Degradation of chlorophenols by a culture of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    .

    Mikrobiologiya58

    : 802-806. [Microbiology 58: 647-651].

  74. Bhalla TC, Miura A, Wakamoto A, Ohba Y, Furuhashi K. 1992. Asymmetric hydrolysis of α-aminonitriles to optically active amino acids by a nitrilase of

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    PA-34.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37

    : 184-190.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  75. Chung SY, Maeda M, Song E, Horikoshi K, Kudo T. 1994. Isolation and characterization of a gram-positive polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading bacterium,

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    s train TA421, from a termite ecosystem.

    Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.58

    : 2111-2113.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  76. Blakey AJ, Colby J, Williams E, O'Reilly C. 1995. Regio- and stereo-specific nitrile hydrolysis by the nitrile hydratase from

    Rhodococcus

    AJ270.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.129

    : 57-62.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  77. Masai E, Yamada A, Healy JM, Hatta T, Kimbara K, Fukuda M,

    et al

    . 1995. Characterization of biphenyl catabolic genes of gram-positive polychlorinated biphenyl degrader

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61

    : 2079-2085.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  78. Hernandez BS, Koh SC, Chial M, Focht DD. 1997. Terpeneutilizing isolates and their relevance to enhanced biotransformation of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil.

    Biodegradation8

    : 153-158.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  79. Chartrain M, Jackey B, Taylor C, Sandford V, Gbewonyo K, Lister L,

    et al

    . 1998. Bioconversion of indene to

    cis

    (1

    S

    ,2

    R

    ) indandiol and trans (1

    R

    ,2

    R

    ) indandiol by

    Rhodococcus

    species.

    J. Ferment. Bioeng.86

    : 550-558.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  80. Yakimov MM, Giuliano L, Bruni V, Scarfì S, Golyshin PN. 1999. Characterization of Antarctic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria capable of producing bioemulsifiers.

    New Microbiol.22

    : 249-256.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  81. Kim D, Kim YS, Kim SK, Kim SW, Zylstra GJ, Kim YM,

    et al

    . 2002. Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68

    : 3270-3278.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  82. Margesin R, Fonteyne PA, Redl B. 2005. Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by

    Rhodococcus

    spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts.

    Res. Microbiol.156

    : 68-75.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  83. Na KS, Kuroda A, Takiguchi N, Ikeda T, Ohtake H, Kato J. 2005. Isolation and characterization of benzene-tolerant

    Rhodococcus opacus

    strains.

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.99

    : 378-382.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  84. Sekine M, Tanikawa S, Omata S, Saito M, Fujisawa T, Tsukatani N,

    et al

    . 2006. Sequence analysis of three plasmids harboured in

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    s train PR4.

    Environ. Microbiol.8

    : 334-346.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  85. Ma Y, Yu H, Pan W, Liu C, Zhang S, Shen Z. 2010. Identification of nitrile hydratase-producing

    Rhodococcus ruber

    TH and characterization of an

    amiE

    -negative mutant.

    Bioresour. Technol.101

    : 285-291.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  86. Cai Q, Zhang B, Chen B, Zhu Z, Lin W, Cao T. 2014. Screening of biosurfactant producers from petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sources in cold marine environments.

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.86

    : 402-410.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Article

Review

Biotechnological Potential of Rhodococcus Biodegradative Pathways

Dockyu Kim 1*, Ki Young Choi 2, Miyoun Yoo 3, Gerben J. Zylstra 4 and Eungbin Kim 5

1Division of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Republic of Korea, 2University College, Yonsei University, Incheon 21983, Republic of Korea, 3Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea, 4Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, NJ 08901-8520, USA, 5Department of Systems Biology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea

Received: December 8, 2017; Accepted: May 1, 2018

Abstract

The genus Rhodococcus is a phylogenetically and catabolically diverse group that has been
isolated from diverse environments, including polar and alpine regions, for its versatile ability
to degrade a wide variety of natural and synthetic organic compounds. Their metabolic
capacity and diversity result from their diverse catabolic genes, which are believed to be
obtained through frequent recombination events mediated by large catabolic plasmids. Many
rhodococci have been used commercially for the biodegradation of environmental pollutants
and for the biocatalytic production of high-value chemicals from low-value materials. Recent
studies of their physiology, metabolism, and genome have broadened our knowledge regarding
the diverse biotechnological applications that exploit their catabolic enzymes and pathways.

Keywords: Biodegradation, bacteria, degradative pathway, Rhodococcus, catabolic enzyme

Introduction

The genus Rhodococcus is a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse bacterial group within nocardioform actinomycetes, which contain mycolic acid in their cell walls. Rhodococcus (family Nocardiaceae) belongs to the phylum Actinobacteria that includes two other well-known families, Mycobacteriaceae and Corynebacteriaceae. Rhodococcus members are described as nonmotile and aerobic gram-positive bacteria that generally show pleomorphic morphology, depending on the species or growth conditions, such as different growth substrates. They have been isolated from a wide variety of sources, including soil, rocks, groundwater, marine sediments, animal feces, internal organs of insects, and healthy and diseased animals and plants [1]. Recently, cold-adapted rhodococcal strains have been isolated from naturally cold environments, such as alpine areas, the Arctic, and the Antarctic [2-4].

After approximately a decade since the first comprehensive account of the genus Rhodococcus in 1998 (see the special issue of Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, volume 74), an excellent book was published that described the biology of Rhodococcus. According to this book, rhodococci are generally found to be harmless, and some are very attractive biotechnological candidates, although there are rare pathogenic species such as R. equi and R. fascians that cause foal pneumonia and leafy gall disease in plants, respectively. The reasons for their value as promising biotechnological candidates for applications are as follows. The members of Rhodococcus show a remarkable ability to degrade and transform a wide variety of natural organic and xenobiotic compounds via diverse catabolic pathways. In addition to the capacity to metabolize a broad spectrum of chemical compounds, cell tolerance to toxic substrates and solvents, a frequent lack of catabolite repression, the production of biosurfactants, and environmental persistence make them excellent candidates for bioremediation and bioconversion. They also have the potential to synthesize useful products such as valuable chemical synthons, amides, and polymers [1, 5].

The metabolic versatility of Rhodococcus has been extensively studied in microbial biotechnology fields worldwide. Presently, there are over 1,800 and over 3,200 patents retrieved by even a quick search on Google’s patent search engine using “rhodococcus biodegradation” and “rhodococcus biocatalysis,” respectively, as keywords. Several review papers have also described the biotechnological potential of rhodococci cells and their biodegradative enzymes for pollutant removal in environmental biotechnology and for biocatalysis in pharmaceutical and chemical industries [6, 7]. The biodegradation and biocatalysis activities are linked by biotransformation reactions and enzymes that catalyze the reactions. In this review, we will briefly summarize the current knowledge on the biodegradative pathways of Rhodococcus , including a brief collation of selected genomic data. We will then describe examples and strategies for utilizing the real and potential value of biodegradative rhodococci.

Rhodococci as Superb Degraders

As summarized in Table 1, rhodococci display a diverse range of metabolic capabilities and degrade a wide variety of natural organic and xenobiotic compounds, including aliphatic, aromatic (halogenated and nitro-substituted), heterocyclic, and polycyclic aromatic compounds [1], alicyclic hydrocarbons [8], nitriles [5], cholesterol [9], and lignins [10]. The wide range of substrates metabolized by rhodococci suggests that members of this genus are comparable to pseudomonads in their biotechnological applications. The biodegradative pathways in rhodococci generally consist of many peripheral (upper) pathways and a few central (lower) pathways. For example, in the case of aromatic hydrocarbons, a wide range of monooxygenases and dioxygenases in the peripheral pathways initiate the oxidative attack of the aromatic ring, producing central intermediates such as catechol, protocatechuate, and gentisate, which are further degraded by the ortho-, meta-, or modified 3-oxoadipate routes to intermediates of the citric acid cycle.

Table 1 . Members of the genus Rhodococcus that possess biocatalytic enzymes and/or biodegradative pathways for representative organic compounds..

Strain nameIsolation sourceDegradation substrateApplication fieldKey pathway or enzymeReference for isolation
R. rhodochrous J1 Soil sample Benzonitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [72]
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil in Moscow, Russia 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol Remediation of (chloro)aromatics Modified ortho-cleavage pathway for chlorocatechols [73]
R. rhodochrous PA-34 Soil sample Propionitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [74]
R. erythropolis TA421 Dry wood termites, Japan Biphenyl Remediation of organic pollutants Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [75]
R. erythropolis BD2 Trichloroethene and toluene contaminated soil Isopropylbenzene Remediation of trichloroethene Isopropylbenzene-degrading genes (ipb) [12]
Rhodococcus sp. AJ270 Air-dried soil from an industrial site, UK Acetonitrile, hetero-aromatic nitriles Remediation of acrylonitrile Nitrile hydratase and amidase [76]
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil, Japan Polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes Remediation of organic pollutants; vanillin production Biphenyl- and ethylbenzene-degrading genes (bph and etb); dye-decolorizing peroxidase (dypB) [77]
Rhodococcus sp. T104 Plant-amended soil Biphenyl, terpenes Remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [78]
Rhodococcus sp. B-264-1 Oil-contaminated soil, the USA Toluene Production of cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol Toluene dioxygenase (todC1C2BA) [79]
Rhodococcus sp. strain Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica n-Alkanes, biphenyl Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [80]
R. opacus PWD4 Topsoil in Hilversum, The Netherlands Toluene Production of trans-carveol Limonene-6-hydroxylase [53]
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil, Korea Alkylbenzenes, phthalates, bicyclics Production of cis-dihydrodiols and catechols o-xylene dioxygenase (akbA1A2A3) and cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (akbB) [81]
Rhodococcus sp. NO14-1 Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated alpine soil, Austria Hexadecane, phenol Low-temperature remediation of phenol Phenol-degrading genes [82]
R. opacus B4 Soil in Hiroshima, Japan Benzene, aromatic/aliphatic Remediation of benzene Benzene dioxygenase (bnzA1A2) [83]
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea of the Pacific Ocean Alkanes Remediation of alkanes Alkane-degrading genes (alk) [84]
R. erythropolis MLT1 Soil surrounding hop plants β-myrcene Production of geraniol Unknown enzymatic mechanism [54]
R. ruber TH Nitrile-contaminated soil Acrylonitrile Production of ammonium acrylate Nitrilase [85]
R. ruber AKSH-84 Petroleum-contaminated sludge, India Acetonitrile Production of acrylic acid Nitrilase [42]
Rhodococcus spp. strains Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated North Atlantic Canada n-Hexadecane, diesel Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [86]
R. erythropolis ATCC 25544 Soil Cholesterol, aromatic compounds Production of cholestenone Cholesterol oxidase Unknown

Biodegradative rhodococci often harbor large catabolic linear plasmids, many of which increase their catabolic versatility and efficiency by contributing to multiple pathways and gene homologs. Such plasmids encode multiple catabolic enzyme systems. Thus, multiple degradative pathways may be involved in the degradation of various organic compounds. Comparative analyses of rhodococcal genomes have suggested that the linear plasmids are possible determinants of the propagation of diverse degradative genes [11]. It is thought that frequent recombination of catabolic genes among bacteria is associated with large plasmids. The hyper recombination contributes to the large number of homologous genes in large genomes, which consequently leads to their catabolic diversity [1]. As representative examples, the highly similar gene clusters for catabolism of aromatic compounds are found on the following three pairs of plasmids: pTA421 from R. erythropolis TA421 and pSP6 from R. globerulus P6, pBD2 from R. erythropolis BD2 [12] and pRHL1 from R. jostii RHA1, and pDK2 from Rhodococcus sp. DK17 and pRHL2 from R. jostii RHA1. In addition to enzyme and pathway multiplicities, different induction mechanisms, substrate specificities, and activities of the catalytic enzymes are thought to contribute to their extraordinary capabilities to metabolize a wide range of compounds.

Since the introduction of the term “megaplasmid” in 1981 to describe a more than 450 kb plasmid from Rhizobium meliloti, there have been many reports on the presence of megaplasmids in different bacteria, which encode the degradation enzymes for various classes of natural and synthetic organic compounds. Table 2 summarizes the brief genome comparisons of biodegradative rhodococci containing catabolic plasmids. These genomes vary in size (5.4–10.1 Mbp) and the number of predicted genes (5,023–9,251). Among the biodegradative rhodococci, R. jostii RHA1 is the most extensively studied strain. RHA1 is a versatile polychlorinated biphenyl degrader, which contains a linear chromosome and three linear megaplasmids (1,120-kb pRHL1, 420-kb pRHL2, and 330-kb pRHL3). Most of the genes of the upper biphenyl catabolic pathway are located mainly on the pRHL1 and pRHL2 plasmids, whereas duplicated phthalate-degrading operons are located on pRHL1 and pRHL2 [13]. Oxygenases genes (203) are exceptionally rich in the RHA1 genome, containing 9,251 predicted protein-encoding genes, many of which are involved in numerous pathways predicted to degrade aromatic compounds (30) or steroids (4) [14]. Another well-studied Rhodococcus strain, DK17, utilizes various alkylbenzenes and phthalates as growth substrates, and also possesses three linear megaplasmids (380-kb pDK1, 330-kb pDK2, and 750-kb pDK3). The genes for alkylbenzene degradation are present in pDK2, whereas the gene clusters for phthalate degradation are duplicated in both pDK2 and pDK3. Duplicated phthalate-degrading operons are equally functional, allowing DK17 to achieve the maximal degradation of phthalate [15]. In addition, it is noteworthy that the phthalate degradation pathway is completely inhibited by benzoate in DK17 [16].

Table 2 . Brief genome statistics of Rhodococcus strains possessing catabolic plasmids.a.

Strain nameIsolation source (degrading substances)Genome size, Mb (GC%)Total gene countTotal protein countNumber of plasmidNCBI BioProject ID
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil (polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes) 9.71 (66.94) 9,251 8,695 3 PRJNA 13693
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea (alkanes) 6.90 (62.29) 6,428 6,278 3 PRJDA 20395
R. opacus B4 Soil (aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons) 8.83 (67.63) 8,048 7,780 5 PRJDA 34839
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil (alkylbenzenes, bicyclics, phthalates) 9.11 (67.10) 8,609 7,954 3 PRJNA 157361
R. aetherivorans BCP1 Aerobic butane-utilizing consortium (alkanes) 6.23 (70.29) 5,644 5,478 2 PRJNA 213668
R. pyridinivorans SB3094 Diesel waste site (butanone) 5.59 (67.81) 5,094 4,916 2 PRJNA 231235
R. opacus R7 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated site (naphthalene, o-xylene) 10.12 (67.02) 8,621 8,357 5 PRJNA 246296
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil (chloroaromatics) 8.64 (67.03) 7,608 7,420 2 PRJNA 253567
Rhodococcus sp. p52 Oil-polluted soil (dioxin) 5.41 (67.85) 5,023 4,801 3 PRJNA 255270
Rhodococcus sp. AD45 Freshwater sediment (isoprene) 6.79 (61.74) 6,202 6,048 2 PRJNA 272922

aBased on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome information accessed in mid-May 2017..


The genomic features of R. jostii RHA1 and Rhodococcus sp. DK17 were compared to study basic genetic similarities and differences between the two strains. A comparative protein-protein BLAST analysis (BLASTp) showed that approximately 75% of open-reading frames (ORFs) from the two strains, including ones for the degradation of aromatics, share >90% identity. Almost identical phthalate operons duplicated on two separate catabolic megaplasmids were also present in the RHA1 genome as in DK17. The DK17-specific ORFs are not randomly distributed over the genome, but occur in groups or clusters. Analyses of the DK17-specific ORFs indicated that many encoded proteins are likely to be involved in the transport of organic molecules, such as aromatic hydrocarbons [17]. This is consistent with the recent genomic discovery that biodegradative rhodococci are well-equipped with genes for the transport of many different substrates [18].

Metabolic Pathways for o-Xylene Degradation as a Representative Example

Most o-xylenes are produced by cracking petroleum and largely used in the production of phthalic anhydride, which is a precursor to many materials, drugs, and other chemicals. Thus, it is a widespread environmental pollutant in groundwater and soil. Although bacteria capable of degrading m-xylene or p-xylene under aerobic conditions are common, bacteria capable of degrading o-xylene are less frequently reported. Thus, o-xylene is considered to be difficult to biologically degrade and only a few bacteria have been studied for the ability to degrade o-xylene. Five different possible metabolic pathways for o-xylene degradation were proposed (Fig. 1), three of which have been experimentally confirmed from Rhodococcus spp. until recently. Rhodococcus sp. DK17 and Rhodococcus sp. C125 (originally Corynebacterium sp. C125) metabolize o-xylene through an aromatic ring dioxygenation to form o-xylene cis -3,4-dihydrodiol (1,2-dihydoxy-3,4-dimethylcyclohexa-3,5-diene), which is converted to 3,4-dimethylcatechol by a dehydrogenation reaction. Rhodococcus sp. B3 and R. opacus R7 degrade o-xylene through two successive monooxygenation reactions of the aromatic ring to form 2,3-dimethylphenol and 3,4-dimethylcatechol. In Rhodococcus sp. B3, a methyl monooxygenation reaction operates simultaneously that oxidizes a methyl group of o-xylene to form 2-methylbenzyl alcohol, which is metabolized to form 3-methylcatechol via 2-methylbenzoic acid. The methyl monooxygenation pathway functions for o-xylene degradation in R. opacus TKN14, from which the genes (nidABEF) for methyl group hydroxylation have been identified and characterized [19]. The central intermediates (dimethyl or monomethyl catechols) are further degraded by ortho- or meta-ring cleavage to intermediates of the citric acid cycle.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Figure 1.o-Xylene degradation pathways operating in Rhodococcus spp. isolates.

An approximately 25-kb-size gene cluster for o-xylene degradation by Rhodococcus sp. DK17 is present on the 330-kb pDK2 (Fig. 2). The cluster contains the genes encoding o-xylene dioxygenase: large and small subunits of the oxygenase component, which are present in two copies 6 kb apart from each other (akbA1a-akbA2a and akbA1b-akbA2b), a gene for the ferredoxin component (akbA3), and a gene for the ferredoxin reductase component (akbA4). When expressed in Escherichia coli, recombinant AkbA1a-AkbA2a-AkbA3 transformed o-xylene into o-xylene cis-3,4-dihydrodiol. Moreover, a gene encoding cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (akbB) and akbCDEF genes for a complete meta-cleavage pathway (meta-cleavage dioxygenase (AkbC), hydrolase (AkbD), hydratase (AkbE), and aldolase (AkbF)) are present in the cluster. AkbBCDEF are thought to completely metabolize the intermediate cis-3,4-dihydrodiol produced by o-xylene dioxygenase [20]. Two-component regulatory genes (akbS and akbT ) are detected near the o-xylene-degrading operon, which are required to induce the expression of o-xylene dioxygenase [21].

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Figure 2. Gene organization on the 330-kb pDK2 in Rhodococcus sp. DK17 (A), and proposed metabolic pathway for o-xylene degradation by DK17 (B). The direction of transcription is indicated by arrowheads.

Application of Targeted Biodegradative Pathways

Biodegradation

Many alkyl- and hydroxyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons and nitriles are released into the environment by industrial activity, whereas some are natural products. Most aromatic hydrocarbons and nitriles are highly toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic. Microorganisms and their degradative pathways have been examined and used in an ecologically favorable process for the biodegradation of various pollutants at contaminated sites. The degradative capacities of aerobic rhodococci are of particular relevance for the bioremediation of organic pollutants derived from the constituents and halogenated products of petroleum. Indeed, there have been many studies involving the biological removal of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, chlorobenzene, phenol, o-xylene, naphthalene, and n -alkanes, using Rhodococcus strains that grew in extraordinarily high concentrations of pollutants and/or metabolized them at high degradative rates [22, 23].

As mentioned above, it has been examined if the rhodococcal strains with o-xylene degradation ability are able to remove o-xylene at a small scale in a laboratory and then be exploited for in situ o-xylene removal in natural environments where the strains were originally isolated. A laboratory-scale biofilter inoculated with o-xylene degrading Rhodococcus sp. BTO62 maintained more than 90% removal efficiency of o-xylene (41 g/m3/h) under sterile condition and the efficiency was enhanced to 160 g/m3/h under nonsterile condition. This indicates the possibility that o-xylene and its degradation intermediates are co-metabolized by BTO62 and other contaminant microorganisms in the biofilter [24]. When co-inoculated with m- and p-xylene-degrading Pseudomonas sp. NBM21, BTO62 was able to remove a mixture of o-, m-, and p-xylenes at an elimination capacity of 180 g/m3/h at 20°C under nonsterile conditions [25]. Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 possesses two well-known degradative gene clusters for biphenyl (bph) and o-xylene (homologous to DK17 akb) degradation. RHA1 was used, together with the bacterium Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 carrying adequate operons for chlorinated benzoate and biphenyl degradation, for sediment microcosms contaminated with a mixture of structurally similar compounds of polychlorinated biphenyls [26]. Rhodococcal cells immobilized in agar or synthetic polymers were also used for the bioremediation of acrylonitrile and toxic amides. Bioaugmentation application of Rhodococcus sp. AJ270 pure culture resulted in the same level of acrylonitrile degradation in the sterilized topsoil as that achieved by whole indigenous bacterial flora in unsterilized control soil [27].

Plant essential oils are abundant, inexpensive, and usually considered nontoxic to humans. Components in these oils have been reported both to stimulate bacterial cell growth and induce catalytic enzymes in their degradative pathways, resulting in higher degradation rates for biphenyl, polychlorinated biphenyls, and trichloroethylene (TCE). For example, the component limonene in orange peels was able to induce the biphenyl degradation pathway in limonene-degrading Rhodococcus sp. T104 [28]. The induction ability of these essential oil components is probably due to the similarity between their chemical structures and the pollutants. Thus, these essential oils or plant materials may be used as a cost-effective bioremediation strategy to stimulate environmental pollutant degradation. When induced by cumin aldehyde and cumene (two components in cumin oil), toluene-degrading Rhodococcus sp. L4 was capable of cometabolic degradation of TCE, with the degradation efficiency being similar to toluene grown cells (57 ± 5% of the initial TCE concentration of 80 μM) [29]. To overcome the need for the repeated addition of inducing substrates to maintain TCE degradation activity, Rhodococcus sp. L4 was immobilized on cumin seeds as plant-immobilizing materials containing cumin aldehyde and cumene. The immobilized organisms tolerated up to 68 μM TCE and continuously degraded TCE, demonstrating that rhodococcal immobilization on plant materials rich in essential oils is a promising method for efficient TCE cometabolic degradation [30].

Even naturally cold environments such as alpine areas and Arctic and Antarctic regions are known to be contaminated with various aromatic and aliphatic compounds. Oil spillage is one of the main concerns, and the petroleum-derived contaminants are generally thought to be persistent in the environment owing to their toxic effects on indigenous microbes and the low temperatures, which limit the rates of microbial degradative processes. However, cold-adapted bacteria play a key role in in situ biodegradation in the cold environments, and their degradative activities and community composition shifts have been extensively studied [31]. Thus, the psychrotolerant and/or psychrophilic bacteria have been characterized as useful tools for low-temperature bioremediation of the environmental contaminants [32, 33]. Rhodococcus members from hydrocarbon-contaminated sites are commonly recognized for their high ability in petroleum hydrocarbon degradation. Several studies have reported the use of indigenous rhodococci to degrade phenolic pollutants in cold environments. Cold-adapted R. erythropolis BZ4 from alpine soil was able to degrade high amounts of phenol (0.7 g/l) at as low a temperature as 15°C [34]. Rhodococcus sp. AQ5-07 from Antarctic soil was capable of completely degrading 0.5 g/l phenol within 120 h at 10°C at the laboratory scale [35].

Biocatalysis

The generation of high-value chemicals from abundant and low-value renewable organic materials using microbial and/or enzymatic biocatalysts is an area of great interest to microbiologists and organic chemists. Biocatalysts are usually more effective than the use of traditional chemical methods, because they metabolize under mild conditions, with high specificity and stereoselectivity, which are needed in the (agro)chemical and the pharmaceutical industries. As shown in a representative review for the biocatalytic application of rhodococcal enzymes, Rhodococcus erythropolis contains a large number of enzymes that are involved in many diverse reactions in bioconversion and degradation processes, such as oxidations, dehydrogenations, epoxidations, hydrolysis, hydroxylations, dehalogenations, and desulfurizations [36]. Several representative bioconversion reactions by catalytic enzymes from Rhodococcus spp. strains are depicted in Fig. 3 and described in detail in the subsections below.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Figure 3. Representative bioconversion reactions by catalytic enzymes from Rhodococcus spp. strains.

Aromatic compounds. Oxygenases are defined as enzymes that catalyze the specific introduction of one (monooxygenase) or two (dioxygenase) oxygen atoms into the substrate. Aromatic dioxygenases have attracted interest for their potential application as biocatalysts for the regioselective and enantioselective synthesis of vicinal cis-dihydrodiols and their dehydrogenation product catechols [37]. As a result of the demand for chiral intermediates, dehydrogenases have also been used for the production of chiral compounds, such as substituted catechols. For example, the naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase enzyme has been used for the production of catechol-like metabolites in biotransformation studies.

The o-xylene dioxygenase from Rhodococcus sp. DK17 possesses the unique ability to perform specific regioselective hydroxylations, depending on the size and position of the substituent groups on the aromatic ring [38]. Molecular modeling studies predicted that the substrate-binding pocket of the DK17 o-xylene dioxygenase is large enough to accommodate bicyclics, and can be divided into three regions (distal, central, and proximal), where hydrophobic interactions in the distal position may be important in substrate binding. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis studies combined with metabolite analyses confirmed these predictions, and further showed that different positioning of substrates in the active site of the enzyme resulted in the generation of different products. For example, DK17 transformed toluene and ethylbenzene into two different cis-dihydrodiols that resulted from an oxidation at the 2,3 and the 3,4 positions on the aromatic ring, whereas it transformed all of the larger substrates tested (biphenyl, naphthalene, indan, tetralin, indene, and 1,2-dihydronaphthalene) exclusively into each corresponding cis-dihydrodiol [8]. Moreover, when expressed in Escherichia coli, the o-xylene dioxygenase (AkbA1A2A3) was able to transform tetralin, indene, and 1,2-dihydronaphthalene into each corresponding cis-dihydrodiol (tetralin cis-dihydrodiol, indan-1,2-diol, and cis-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, respectively) [8]. These bioconversion studies suggested that the DK17 cells or recombinant o-xylene dioxygenase, with the capability for aromatic and alicyclic hydroxylation of indan derivatives, could be used as a promising biocatalyst for the development of new chemicals (Fig. 4).

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Figure 4. Regioselective oxidation of monocyclics and bicyclics by Rhodococcus sp. DK17 o-xylene dioxygenase. The oxidation product(s) from each substrate are as follows: 1, o-xylene; 2, 1,2-dihydroxy-3,4-dimethylcyclohexa-3,5-diene; 3, toluene; 4, cis-2,3- toluene dihydrodiol; 5, cis-3,4-toluene dihydrodiol; 6, ethylbenzene; 7, cis-2,3-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 8, cis-3,4-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 9, indan; 10, cis-indan-4,5-dihydrodiol; 11, tetralin; 12, tetralin cis-dihydrodiol; 13, m -xylene; 14, 3-methylbenzyl alcohol; 15, 2,4-dimethylphenol; 16, p-xylene; 17, cis-p-xylene dihydrodiol; 18, biphenyl; 19, cis-2,3-bipheyl dihydrodiol; 20, naphthalene; 21, cis-1,2-naphthalene dihydrodiol; 22, indene; 23, indan-1,2-diol; 24, 1,2-dihydronaphthalene; 25, cis-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene. The left and right panels show growth and non-growth substrates of DK17, respectively.

Indan and its derivatives are frequently used as starting materials for the preparation of synthons for pharmaceutical and fine chemical synthesis. Rhodococcus sp. I24, possessing a toluene dioxygenase, was capable of transforming indene to cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol, a potential precursor to (−)-cis- (1S,2R)-1-aminoindan-2-ol, a key chiral synthon for indinavir, an HIV protease inhibitor [39]. When scaled up in a 14-L bioreactor, Rhodococcus sp. B-264-1 produced 2,000 mg/l of cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol (an enantiometric excess > 99%) and yielded up to 4,000 mg/l in process development studies. In addition to the oxidation of indene to cis-(1S,2R)- indandiol, indan and tetralin were transformed to a variety of indandiols for chiral drugs by enantioselective benzylic microbial hydroxylation [38]. Research has also been performed to obtain patentable melatonin receptor ligands, including synthesis of tricyclic indan derivatives for the development of new melatonin receptor agonists [40].

Nitriles. Nitriles are organic compounds that have a −C≡N functional group. They are common environmental pollutants. Rhodococci have been shown to degrade and bioconvert a wide range of nitriles. The hydrolysis of nitrile to the corresponding carboxylic acid is catalyzed by a nitrilase or by the successive actions of a nitrile hydratase (NHase) and an amidase, which metabolizes the intermediate amide to carboxylic acid. Thus, the nitrile-converting enzymes, nitrilase and NHase, are responsible for the bioconversion of a wide variety of structurally different nitriles. The bioconversion of acrylonitrile has become attractive because of its industrial applicability in acrylamide production. Acrylamide can be prepared by the hydrolysis of acrylonitrile by NHase. This is beneficial in acrylamide production because nitrile-hydrating whole-cell biocatalysts generally exhibit low or no amidase activity for acrylamide.

Because of progress in understanding microbial nitrile metabolism, NHases from Rhodococcus sp. N-774 and R. rhodochrous J1 have been used in the kiloton-scale production of acrylamide, which is known as one of the most commercially successful microbial biotransformations. The polyacrylamide-entrapped resting cells of R. rhodochrous PA-34 produced a total of 1,217 g/l acrylamide in a partitioned fed-batch reactor recycling the entrapped cells [41]. Rhodococci with nitrilase activity was also used to convert acrylonitrile into acrylic acid, which is traditionally used for the production of diverse acrylic esters in many industries. A versatile acrylonitrile-bioconverting R. ruber AKSH-84 was studied for optimization of medium and biotransformation conditions for acrylic acid production [42]. R. ruber TH, expressing NHase, amidase, and nitrilase, was transformed to a NHase-amidase double-knockout mutant, and the resultant mutant, which was still able to express nitrilase at extremely low level, was subsequently engineered to overexpress a heterologous nitrilase from R. rhodochrous tg1-A6 with a high activity of nitrilase. When the engineered cells expressing two nitrilases were used as a catalyst at room temperature, the amount and productivity of ammonium acrylate increased to 741.0 g/l and 344.9 g/l/h, respectively, which were the highest values reported to date [43].

Lignin polymer. Large amounts of small molecular aromatic compounds originate from decaying plant material containing (hemi) cellulose and lignin (a complex aromatic heteropolymer). In addition to natural lignin, large quantities of kraft lignin are formed in the pulp industry. Thus, lignin degradation products are of considerable interest as a renewable source of high-value aromatic compounds and other lignin-derived products [44]. Lignin is composed of phenylpropanoid aryl-C3 units (guaiacyl, syringyl, and p-hydroxyphenyl), linked together via a variety of ether and C-C bonds. The most common chemical linkage found in lignin is the β-aryl ether, accounting for 45–50% and 60% of the units in softwoods and hardwoods, respectively [45]. When these linkages are broken, a wide range of ligninderived low-molecular phenolic compounds are produced [46].

R. jostii RHA1 was intensively characterized for its degradation properties of aromatic compounds (especially, polychlorinated biphenyl and alkylbenzenes) using its catalytic enzymes and pathways. RHA1 was later shown to break down lignin and lignocellulose. In RHA1, lignin degradation is proposed to be initiated by an extracellular dye-decolorizing peroxidase B (DypB), resulting in vanillin as a main intermediate. Vanillin is further catabolized to vanillate and then protocatechuate by the activities of vanillin dehydrogenase (Vdh) and vanillate O-demethylase (VanAB), respectively, which is subjected to intradiol oxidative ring cleavage. Recombinant DypB was shown to recognize the β-aryl ether structure and cleave the Cα-Cβ bond in β-aryl ether lignin model compounds, producing vanillin, a valuable chemical for food flavoring. DypB also showed linkage cleavage activity for kraft lignins and wheat straw lignocellulose [47]. Interestingly, when encapsulated with encapsulin protein from RHA1, the assembled complex DypB showed an 8-fold enhanced lignin degradation activity, when compared with DypB alone [48]. A vdh gene deletion mutant of RHA1, when grown on minimal medium containing 2.5% wheat straw lignocellulose and 0.05% glucose, accumulated vanillin (96 mg/l after 6 days) [10]. Natural vanillin production is of intense interest to the flavor and fragrance industry.

Terpenes and terpenoids. Terpenes, composed of isoprene units, are a large and diverse class of organic compounds produced by a variety of plants. They are used in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology industries. Terpenoids (isoprenoids) are known as modified terpenes involving methyl groups that have been moved or removed, or added oxygen atoms, thus containing additional functional groups. Terpenes and terpenoids are the primary constituents of plant and flower essential oils, and are widely used as fragrances and flavors in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Synthetic variations and derivatives of natural terpenes and terpenoids also greatly expand the variety of aromas used in perfumery and flavors used as food additives. Monoterpenes are branched-chain C10 hydrocarbons with two isoprene units that are widely distributed in nature, with more than 400 different monoterpenes identified. Thus, bacteria with the ability to degrade monoterpenes are relatively common, and a degradation pathway via initial oxidation of the benzylic methyl group has been extensively studied at the biochemical and genetic levels. For example, in the cases of p-cymene and limonene, the initial oxidation of the benzylic methyl groups of monoterpenes was performed by a monooxygenase, producing corresponding alcohols that were oxidized to aldehydes and then acids by respective dehydrogenases. The further degradation of those acidic intermediates was processed through lower degradation pathways [49].

Limonene, a monocyclic monoterpene, is the main constituent of orange and lemon peel oil (92–96%), which is a byproduct of the fruit juice industry, and is present in a mixture of both enantiomers (4R)-limonene and (4S)-limonene. In plants, the terpenoid carvone is biosynthesized via ring hydroxylation of limonene to carveol, the hydroxyl group of which is subsequently oxidized to ketone, resulting in carvone. There have been many reports concerning the biotransformation by microorganisms of low-priced limonene to more valuable naturally flavored monoterpenoids such as carveol and carvone. Carveol and carvone are widely used in the flavor and fragrance industries. Carveol also has chemopreventive potential for mammary carcinogenesis with little or no toxicity. Oils containing carvones are used in aromatherapy and alternative medicine.

R. erythropolis DCL14, which is able to grow on limonene and limonene derivatives such as carveol and carvone, was reported to metabolize limonene via an initial attack at the 1,2 double bond by monooxygenase, leading to limonene-1,2-epoxide. Limonene-1,2-epoxide is converted to limonene-1,2-diol by limonene epoxide hydrolase activity [50]. DCL14 also metabolized all four stereoisomers of carveol via oxidation by carveol dehydrogenase to two carvone enantiomers [51]. In a laboratory-scale aqueous/organic system, using an air-driven column reactor, DCL14 whole cells biotransformed carveol (a mixture of isomers) to carvone (0.68 g carvone/g carveol) [52]. The chemostat-grown cells of toluene-degrading R. opacus PWD4 were able to hydroxylate (4R)-limonene (D-limonene) to enantiomerically pure trans-carveol, with a final yield of 94–97%. Another toluene degrader (R. globerulus PWD8) oxidized most of the formed trans-carveol to (4R)-carvone, which is used as a flavor compound [53]. As another example of the use of rhodococcal microbial or enzymatic catalysis, although the chemical-enzymatic mechanism is presently unclear, the resting cells of R. erythropolis MLT1 converted the monoterpene β-myrcene to geraniol, which has a rose-like scent and is commonly used in perfumes. A scalable process for geraniol production is being developed [54].

Cholesterol. Steroids are organic compounds composed of four fused rings (three six-member cyclohexane rings A, B, and C; and one five-member cyclopentane ring D). Steroids vary by the functional groups attached to this four-ring core and by the oxidation state of the rings. As an example, cholesterol, having a hydroxyl group attached at position C-3 in ring A, is an important component of cell membranes and is biosynthesized by all animal cells and even by plants in very small amounts. Cholesterol is a major starting material for the production of steroid drugs and hormones, because of the low cost and ease of transformation [9]. Microorganisms capable of degrading cholesterol as a common carbon source have been used to promote selective removal of steroid side chains, while leaving the steroid rings intact [55].

Degradation of the cholesterol rings is initiated by either an NAD+-dependent 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase or cholesterol oxidase, depending on the strain [56]. The side chain degradation is initiated by a cytochrome P450 that catalyzes the oxidation of C26 to the corresponding carboxylic acid, and side chain removal proceeds via a mechanism similar to the β-oxidation of fatty acids. However, it is not clear whether the side chain and ring degradation processes occur simultaneously or independently [9]. In the case of R. jostii RHA1, the reaction product of the side chain removal and initial ring oxidation (4-androstene-3,17-dione) is metabolized to 1,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione, which is later subjected to successive B and A ring cleavages by a nonenzymatic reaction and an extradiol dioxygenase (HsaC enzyme), respectively [57]. All the rhodococci genes presently sequenced are predicted to encode this pathway, suggesting that cholesterol degradation is a common characteristic of this genus [9]. Bioconversion of steroids has been applied to resting cells in aqueous/organic solvents in two-phase systems [58]. Because the oxidation of cholesterol to cholestenone (cholest-4-en-3-one) by cholesterol oxidase is the first step of ring oxidation in microbial degradation, cholestenone production by cholesterol oxidase-producing rhodococci cells was investigated as a model system for the bioconversion of steroids. A systematic investigation for efficient biotransformation of cholesterol to cholestenone was performed with cell-linked and extracellular cholesterol oxidases from R. erythropolis ATCC 25544 [59].

Concluding Remarks

Over the past decade, bioinformatics has been integrated with biodegradation and biocatalysis to produce new research tools useful in databases [60-62]. With online databases linking genomic information, such as UM-BBD (http://umbbd.msi.umn.edu/) and KEGG (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/), the functions of genes within these genomic sequences can be assigned, and biocatalytic reactions and biodegradation pathways can be predicted [63, 64]. These pathway prediction systems allow prediction of the degradation pathways and identification of the enzymes involved in the degradation pathways.

As of mid-May 2017, a total of 226 rhodococci genome sequences have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (USA). These sequences can be used for genome-scale comparisons of the genetic relatedness among rhodococcal strains and metabolic characteristics involving pathways, reactions, catalytic enzymes, and metabolites. Genomic analyses of Rhodococcus strains have already provided insights into their biotechnological potentials and ecological roles [65, 66]. As stated by Arora and Bae [67], bioinformatics and biodegradation are two critical scientific fields in applied microbiology and biotechnology. In this context, the cutting-edge “omics” technology, combined with genetic engineering tools, can exploit extensively the potential of biodegradative rhodococci to develop new approaches for biodegradation and biocatalysis. The concept of “from genomics to metabolomics” has already been successfully applied to biodegradation and biocatalysis [68, 69]. This approach would also be very useful for developing strategies to harness the real and potential value of biodegradative rhodococci (Fig. 5).

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of Rhodococcus biodegradative pathways and omics technology outline.

The catabolic enzymes specifically adapted to low temperatures (cold-active enzymes) are thought to be a product from cold adaptation mechanisms used by microorganisms. The cold-active enzymes from cold-adapted microbes show high catalytic activities at low temperatures, which makes them excellent biocatalysts in biotechnological and industrial applications. However, few reports have been published about rhodococcal cold-active enzymes, in spite of their biotechnological potential [70, 71]. Thus, the isolation and characterization of novel cold-active enzymes, such as esterase, protease, lipase, cellulase, and peroxidase, from rhodococci inhabiting different cold environments (polar marine, soil, and glacier) should be an important research subject in the near future.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by “Modeling responses of terrestrial organisms to environmental changes on King George Island” (Grant No. PE18090), funded by the Korea Polar Research Institute. We thank Yoo-Min An for the illustration.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Figure 1.

o

-Xylene degradation pathways operating in

Rhodococcus

spp. isolates.

Fig 2.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Figure 2.Gene organization on the 330-kb pDK2 in

Rhodococcus

sp. DK17 (A), and proposed metabolic pathway for

o

-xylene degradation by DK17 (B). The direction of transcription is indicated by arrowheads.

Fig 3.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Figure 3.Representative bioconversion reactions by catalytic enzymes from

Rhodococcus

spp. strains.

Fig 4.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Figure 4.Regioselective oxidation of monocyclics and bicyclics by

Rhodococcus

sp. DK17

o

-xylene dioxygenase. The oxidation product(s) from each substrate are as follows: 1,

o

-xylene; 2, 1,2-dihydroxy-3,4-dimethylcyclohexa-3,5-diene; 3, toluene; 4,

cis

-2,3- toluene dihydrodiol; 5,

cis

-3,4-toluene dihydrodiol; 6, ethylbenzene; 7,

cis

-2,3-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 8,

cis

-3,4-ethylbenzene dihydrodiol; 9, indan; 10,

cis

-indan-4,5-dihydrodiol; 11, tetralin; 12, tetralin

cis

-dihydrodiol; 13,

m

-xylene; 14, 3-methylbenzyl alcohol; 15, 2,4-dimethylphenol; 16,

p

-xylene; 17,

cis

-

p

-xylene dihydrodiol; 18, biphenyl; 19,

cis

-2,3-bipheyl dihydrodiol; 20, naphthalene; 21,

cis

-1,2-naphthalene dihydrodiol; 22, indene; 23, indan-1,2-diol; 24, 1,2-dihydronaphthalene; 25,

cis

-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene. The left and right panels show growth and non-growth substrates of DK17, respectively.

Fig 5.

Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Figure 5.Schematic illustration of

Rhodococcus

biodegradative pathways and omics technology outline.

Table 1 . Members of the genus Rhodococcus that possess biocatalytic enzymes and/or biodegradative pathways for representative organic compounds..

Strain nameIsolation sourceDegradation substrateApplication fieldKey pathway or enzymeReference for isolation
R. rhodochrous J1 Soil sample Benzonitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [72]
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil in Moscow, Russia 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol Remediation of (chloro)aromatics Modified ortho-cleavage pathway for chlorocatechols [73]
R. rhodochrous PA-34 Soil sample Propionitrile Production of acrylamide Nitrile hydratase (H_NHase α and β subunits) [74]
R. erythropolis TA421 Dry wood termites, Japan Biphenyl Remediation of organic pollutants Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [75]
R. erythropolis BD2 Trichloroethene and toluene contaminated soil Isopropylbenzene Remediation of trichloroethene Isopropylbenzene-degrading genes (ipb) [12]
Rhodococcus sp. AJ270 Air-dried soil from an industrial site, UK Acetonitrile, hetero-aromatic nitriles Remediation of acrylonitrile Nitrile hydratase and amidase [76]
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil, Japan Polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes Remediation of organic pollutants; vanillin production Biphenyl- and ethylbenzene-degrading genes (bph and etb); dye-decolorizing peroxidase (dypB) [77]
Rhodococcus sp. T104 Plant-amended soil Biphenyl, terpenes Remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls Biphenyl-degrading genes (bph) [78]
Rhodococcus sp. B-264-1 Oil-contaminated soil, the USA Toluene Production of cis-(1S,2R)-indandiol Toluene dioxygenase (todC1C2BA) [79]
Rhodococcus sp. strain Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica n-Alkanes, biphenyl Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [80]
R. opacus PWD4 Topsoil in Hilversum, The Netherlands Toluene Production of trans-carveol Limonene-6-hydroxylase [53]
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil, Korea Alkylbenzenes, phthalates, bicyclics Production of cis-dihydrodiols and catechols o-xylene dioxygenase (akbA1A2A3) and cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (akbB) [81]
Rhodococcus sp. NO14-1 Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated alpine soil, Austria Hexadecane, phenol Low-temperature remediation of phenol Phenol-degrading genes [82]
R. opacus B4 Soil in Hiroshima, Japan Benzene, aromatic/aliphatic Remediation of benzene Benzene dioxygenase (bnzA1A2) [83]
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea of the Pacific Ocean Alkanes Remediation of alkanes Alkane-degrading genes (alk) [84]
R. erythropolis MLT1 Soil surrounding hop plants β-myrcene Production of geraniol Unknown enzymatic mechanism [54]
R. ruber TH Nitrile-contaminated soil Acrylonitrile Production of ammonium acrylate Nitrilase [85]
R. ruber AKSH-84 Petroleum-contaminated sludge, India Acetonitrile Production of acrylic acid Nitrilase [42]
Rhodococcus spp. strains Petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated North Atlantic Canada n-Hexadecane, diesel Low-temperature remediation n-Alkane-degrading and biosurfactant-producing genes [86]
R. erythropolis ATCC 25544 Soil Cholesterol, aromatic compounds Production of cholestenone Cholesterol oxidase Unknown

Table 2 . Brief genome statistics of Rhodococcus strains possessing catabolic plasmids.a.

Strain nameIsolation source (degrading substances)Genome size, Mb (GC%)Total gene countTotal protein countNumber of plasmidNCBI BioProject ID
R. jostii RHA1 Hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil (polychlorinated biphenyl, alkylbenzenes) 9.71 (66.94) 9,251 8,695 3 PRJNA 13693
R. erythropolis PR4 Deep sea (alkanes) 6.90 (62.29) 6,428 6,278 3 PRJDA 20395
R. opacus B4 Soil (aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons) 8.83 (67.63) 8,048 7,780 5 PRJDA 34839
Rhodococcus sp. DK17 Crude oil-contaminated soil (alkylbenzenes, bicyclics, phthalates) 9.11 (67.10) 8,609 7,954 3 PRJNA 157361
R. aetherivorans BCP1 Aerobic butane-utilizing consortium (alkanes) 6.23 (70.29) 5,644 5,478 2 PRJNA 213668
R. pyridinivorans SB3094 Diesel waste site (butanone) 5.59 (67.81) 5,094 4,916 2 PRJNA 231235
R. opacus R7 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated site (naphthalene, o-xylene) 10.12 (67.02) 8,621 8,357 5 PRJNA 246296
R. opacus 1CP Contaminated soil (chloroaromatics) 8.64 (67.03) 7,608 7,420 2 PRJNA 253567
Rhodococcus sp. p52 Oil-polluted soil (dioxin) 5.41 (67.85) 5,023 4,801 3 PRJNA 255270
Rhodococcus sp. AD45 Freshwater sediment (isoprene) 6.79 (61.74) 6,202 6,048 2 PRJNA 272922

aBased on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome information accessed in mid-May 2017..


References

  1. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CC. 2006. Biodegradation by members of the genus

    Rhodococcus

    : biochemistry, physiology, and genetic adaptation.

    Adv. Appl. Microbiol.59

    : 1-29.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  2. Hwang CY, Lee I, Cho Y, Lee YM, Baek K, Jung YJ,

    et al

    . 2015.

    Rhodococcus

    aerolatus sp. nov., isolated from subarctic rainwater.

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.65

    : 465-471.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  3. Goordial J, Raymond-Bouchard I, Zolotarov Y, de Bethencourt L, Ronholm J, Shapiro N,

    et al

    . 2016. Cold adaptive traits revealed by comparative genomic analysis of the eurypsychrophile

    Rhodococcus

    sp. JG3 i solated f rom high elevation McMurdo Dry Valley permafrost, Antarctica.

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.92

    : fiv154.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  4. Sinha RK, Krishnan KP, Hatha AA, Rahiman M, Thresyamma DD, Kerkar S. 2017. Divers ity of retrievable heterotrophic bacteria in Kongsfjorden, an Arctic fjord.

    Braz. J. Microbiol.48

    : 51-61.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  5. Martínková L, Uhnáková B, Pátek M, Nesvera J, Kren V. 2009. Biodegradation potential of the genus

    Rhodococcus

    .

    Environ. Int.35

    : 162-177.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  6. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CC. 2005. Biodegradation and

    Rhodococcus

    - masters of catabolic versatility.

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16

    : 282-290.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  7. Singh R, Sharma R, Tewari N, Geetanjali, Rawat DS. 2006. Nitrilase and its application as a 'green' catalyst.

    Chem. Biodivers.3

    : 1279-1287.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  8. Kim D, Yoo M, Choi KY, Kang BS, Kim TK, Hong SG,

    et al

    . 2011. Differential degradation of bicyclics with aromatic and alicyclic rings by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77

    : 8280-8287.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  9. Yam KC, Okamoto S, Roberts JN, Eltis LD. 2011. Adventures in

    Rhodococcus

    - from steroids to explosives.

    Can. J. Microbiol.57

    : 155-168.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  10. Sainsbury PD, Hardiman EM, Ahmad M, Otani H, Seghezzi N, Eltis LD,

    et al

    . 2013. Breaking down lignin to high-value chemicals: the conversion of lignocellulose to vanillin in a gene deletion mutant of

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1.

    ACS Chem. Biol.8

    : 2151-2156.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  11. Warren R, Hsiao WW, Kudo H, Myhre M, Dosanjh M, Petrescu A,

    et al

    . 2004. Functional characterization of a catabolic plasmid from polychlorinated-biphenyl-degrading

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1.

    J. Bacteriol.186

    : 7783-7795.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  12. Dabrock B, Kesseler M, Averhoff B, Gottschalk G. 1994. Identification and characterization of a transmissible linear plasmid from

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    BD2 that encodes isopropylbenzene and trichloroethene catabolism.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.60

    : 853-860.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  13. Patrauchan MA, Florizone C, Dosanjh M, Mohn WW, Davies J, Eltis LD. 2005. Catabolism of benzoate and phthalate in

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1: redundancies and convergence.

    J. Bacteriol.187

    : 4050-4063.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  14. McLeod MP, Warren RL, Hsiao WW, Araki N, Myhre M, Fernandes C,

    et al

    . 2006. The complete genome of

    Rhodococcus

    sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103

    : 15582-15587.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  15. Choi KY, Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2007. Requirement of duplicated operons for maximal metabolism of phthalate by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.357

    : 766-771.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  16. Choi KY, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2007. Benzoate catabolite repression of the phthalate degradation pathway in

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73

    : 1370-1374.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  17. Yoo M, Kim D, Choi KY, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim E. 2012. Draft genome sequence and comparative analysis of the superb aromatic-hydrocarbon degrader

    Rhodococcus

    sp. s train DK17.

    J. Bacteriol.194

    : 4440.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  18. de Carvalho CC, Costa SS, Fernandes P, Couto I, Viveiros M. 2014. Membrane transport systems and the biodegradation potential and pathogenicity of genus

    Rhodococcus

    .

    Front Physiol.5

    : 133.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  19. Maruyama T, Ishikura M, Taki H, Shindo K, Kasai H, Haga M,

    et al

    . 2005. Isolation and characterization of

    o

    -xylene oxygenase genes from

    Rhodococcus opacus

    TKN14.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71

    : 7705-7715.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  20. Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Kim YS, Kim SK, Nam MH,

    et al

    . 2004. Identification of a novel dioxygenase involved in metabolism of

    o

    -xylene, toluene, and ethylbenzene by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. s train DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70

    : 7086-7092.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  21. Kim D, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ, Sohn HY, Kwon GS, Kim E. 2005. Identification of two-component regulatory genes involved in

    o

    -xylene degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    J. Microbiol.43

    : 49-53.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  22. Kohyama E, Yoshimura A, Aoshima D, Yoshida T, Kawamoto H, Nagasawa T. 2006. Convenient treatment of acetonitrile-containing wastes using the tandem combination of nitrile hydratase and amidase-producing microorganisms.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.72

    : 600-606.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  23. Paisio CE, Quevedo MR, Talano MA, González PS, Agostini E. 2014. Application of two bacterial strains for wastewater bioremediation and assessment of phenolics biodegradation.

    Environ. Technol.35

    : 1802-1810.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  24. Jeong E, Hirai M, Shoda M. 2008. Removal of

    o

    -xylene using biofilter inoculated with

    Rhodococcus

    sp. BTO62.

    J. Hazard. Mater.152

    : 140-147.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  25. Jeong E, Hirai M, Shoda M. 2009. Removal of xylene by a mixed culture of Pseudomonas sp. NBM21 and

    Rhodococcus

    sp. BTO62 in biofilter.

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.108

    : 136-141.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  26. Rodrigues JL, Kachel CA, Aiello MR, Quensen JF, Maltseva OV, Tsoi TV,

    et al

    . 2006. Degradation of aroclor 1242 dechlorination products in sediments by

    Burkholderia xenovorans

    LB400 (

    ohb

    ) and

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1 (

    fcb

    ).

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72

    : 2476-2482.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  27. Baxter J, Garton NJ, Cummings SP. 2006. The impact of acrylonitrile and bioaugmentation on the biodegradation activity and bacterial community structure of topsoil.

    Folia Microbiol.51

    : 591-597.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  28. Kim D, Park MJ, Koh SC, So JS, Kim E. 2002. Three separate pathways for the initial oxidation of limonene, biphenyl, and phenol by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain T104.

    J. Microbiol.40

    : 86-89.

  29. Suttinun O, Müller R, Luepromchai E. 2009. Trichloroethylene cometabolic degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. L4 induced with plant essential oils.

    Biodegradation20

    : 281-291.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  30. Suttinun O, Müller R, Luepromchai E. 2010. Cometabolic degradation of trichloroethene by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain L4 immobilized on plant materials rich in essential oils.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76

    : 4684-4690.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  31. Labbé D, Margesin R, Schinner F, Whyte LG, Greer CW. 2007. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in pristine and hydrocarbon-contaminated Alpine soils.

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.59

    : 466-475.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  32. Margesin R. 2007. Alpine microorganisms: useful tools for low-temperature bioremediation.

    J. Microbiol.45

    : 281-285.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  33. Kim D, Yoo M, Kim E, Hong SG. 2015. Anthranilate degradation by a cold-adapted

    Pseudomonas

    sp.

    J. Basic Microbiol.55

    : 354-362.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  34. Margesin R, Moertelmaier C, Mair J. 2013. Low-temperature biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (

    n

    -alkanes, phenol, anthracene, pyrene) by four actinobacterial strains.

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation84

    : 185-191.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  35. Lee GLY, Ahmad SA, Yasid NA, Zulkharnain A, Convey P, Johari WLW,

    et al

    . 2018. Biodegradation of phenol by coldadapted bacteria from Antarctic soils.

    Polar Biol. 41

    : 553-562.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  36. de Carvalho CC, da Fonseca MM. 2005. The remarkable

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    .

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.67

    : 715-726.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  37. Nolan LC, O'Connor KE. 2008. Dioxygenase- and monooxygenase-catalysed synthesis of

    cis

    -dihydrodiols, catechols, epoxides and other oxygenated products.

    Biotechnol. Lett.30

    : 1879-1891.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  38. Kim D, Yoo M, Choi KY, Kang BS, Kim E. 2013. Characterization and engineering of an

    o

    -xylene dioxygenase for biocatalytic applications.

    Bioresour. Technol.145

    : 123-127.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  39. Priefert H, O'Brien XM, Lessard PA, Dexter AF, Choi EE, Tomic S,

    et al

    . 2004. Indene bioconversion by a toluene inducible dioxygenase of

    Rhodococcus

    sp. I24.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.65

    : 168-176.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  40. Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Poeggeler B, Hardeland R, Cardinali DP. 2007. Drug insight: the use of melatonergic agonists for the treatment of insomnia - focus on ramelteon.

    Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol.3

    : 221-228.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  41. Raj J, Prasad S, Sharma NN, Bhalla TC. 2010. Bioconversion of acrylonitrile to acrylamide using polyacrylamide entrapped cells of

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    PA-34.

    Folia Microbiol.55

    : 442-446.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  42. Kamal A, Kumar MS, Kumar CG, Shaik T. 2011. Bioconversion of acrylonitrile to acrylic acid by

    Rhodococcus ruber

    s train AKSH-84.

    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.21

    : 37-42.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  43. Sun J, Yu H, Chen J, Luo H, Shen Z. 2016. Ammonium acrylate biomanufacturing by an engineered

    Rhodococcus ruber

    with nitrilase overexpression and double-knockout of nitrile hydratase and amidase.

    J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.43

    : 1631-1639.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  44. Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PC, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM. 2010. The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals.

    Chem. Rev.110

    : 3552-3599.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  45. Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. 2011. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi.

    Nat. Prod. Rep.28

    : 1883-1896.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  46. Gellerstedt G. 2015. Softwood kraft lignin: raw material for the future.

    Ind. Crops Prod.77

    : 845-854.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  47. Ahmad M, Roberts JN, Hardiman EM, Singh R, Eltis LD, Bugg TD. 2011. Identification of DypB from

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1 as a lignin peroxidase.

    Biochemistry50

    : 5096-5107.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  48. Rahmanpour R, Bugg TD. 2013. Assembly in vitro of

    Rhodococcus jostii

    RHA1 encapsulin and peroxidase DypB to form a nanocompartment.

    FEBS J. 280

    : 2097-2104.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  49. Bae HW, Kim D, Choi KY, Kwon NR, Chae JC, Zylstra GJ,

    et al

    . 2007. Functional identification of

    p

    -cumate operons in the terpene-degrading

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain T104.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.266

    : 54-59.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  50. De Carvalho CCCR, Van Keulen F, Da Fonseca MMR. 2000. Biotransformation of limonene-1,2-epoxide to limonene-1,2-diol by

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    cells: an introductory approach to selective hydrolysis and product separation.

    Food Technol. Biotechnol.38

    : 181-185.

  51. van der Werf MJ, Boot AM. 2000. Metabolism of carveol and dihydrocarveol in

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    DCL14.

    Microbiology146

    : 1129-1141.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  52. de Carvalho CC, Poretti A, da Fonseca MM. 2005. Cell adaptation to solvent, substrate and product: a successful strategy to overcome product inhibition in a bioconversion system.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.69

    : 268-275.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  53. Duetz WA, Fjällman AH, Ren S, Jourdat C, Witholt B. 2001. Biotransformation of D-limonene to (+)

    trans

    -carveol by toluene-grown

    Rhodococcus opacus

    PWD4 cells.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67

    : 2829-2832.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  54. Thompson ML, Marriott R, Dowle A, Grogan G. 2010. Biotransformation of β-myrcene to geraniol by a strain of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    isolated by selective enrichment from hop plants.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.85

    : 721-730.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  55. García JL, Uhía I, Galán B. 2012. Catabolism and biotechnological applications of cholesterol degrading bacteria.

    Microb. Biotechnol.5

    : 679-699.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  56. Yang X, Dubnau E, Smith I, Sampson NS. 2007. Rv1106c from

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    is a 3 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase.

    Biochemistry46

    : 9058-9067.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  57. Van der Geize R, Yam K, Heuser T, Wilbrink MH, Hara H, Anderton MC,

    et al

    . 2007. A gene cluster encoding cholesterol catabolism in a soil actinomycete provides insight into

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    survival in macrophages.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104

    : 1947-1952.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  58. Fernandes P, Cruz A, Angelova B, Pinheiro HM, Cabral JMS. 2003. Microbial conversion of steroid compounds: recent developments.

    Enzyme Microb. Technol.32

    : 688-705.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  59. Sojo MM, Bru RR, García-Carmona FF. 2002.

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    ATCC 25544 as a suitable source of cholesterol oxidase: cell-linked and extracellular enzyme synthesis, purification and concentration.

    BMC Biotechnol.2

    : 3.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  60. Arora PK, Kumar M, Chauhan A, Raghava GP, Jain RK. 2009. OxDBase: a database of oxygenases involved in biodegradation.

    BMC Res. Notes2

    : 67.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  61. Carbajosa G, Trigo A, Valencia A, Cases I. 2009. Bionemo: molecular information on biodegradation metabolism.

    Nucleic Acids Res.37(Database issue)

    : D598-D602.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  62. Caspi R, Altman T, Dreher K, Fulcher CA, Subhraveti P, Keseler IM,

    et al

    . 2012. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the Bi°Cyc collection of pathway/genome databases.

    Nucleic Acids Res.40(D1)

    : D742-D753.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  63. Ellis LB, Wackett LP. 2012. Use of the University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/biodegradation Database for study of microbial degradation.

    Microb. Inform. Exp.2

    : 1.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  64. Kanehisa M. 2013. Chemical and genomic evolution of enzyme-catalyzed reaction networks.

    FEBS Lett.587

    : 2731-2737.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  65. Fernández de Las Heras L, Perera J, Navarro Llorens JM. 2014. Cholesterol to cholestenone oxidation by ChoG, the main extracellular cholesterol oxidase of

    Rhodococcus ruber

    strain Chol-4.

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.139

    : 33-44.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  66. Khairy H, Meinert C, Wübbeler JH, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Voigt B,

    et al

    . 2016. Genome and proteome analysis of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    MI2: elucidation of the 4,4'-dithiodibutyric acid catabolism.

    PLoS One11

    : e0167539.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  67. Arora PK, Bae H. 2014. Integration of bioinformatics to biodegradation.

    Biol. Proced. Online16

    : 8.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  68. Pérez-Pantoja D, De la Iglesia R, Pieper DH, González B. 2008. Metabolic reconstruction of aromatic compounds degradation from the genome of the amazing pollutantdegrading bacterium

    Cupriavidus necator

    JMP134.

    FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32

    : 736-794.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  69. Romero-Silva MJ, Méndez V, Agulló L, Seeger M. 2013. Genomic and functional analyses of the gentisate and protocatechuate ring-cleavage pathways and related 3-hydroxybenzoate and 4-hydroxybenzoate peripheral pathways in

    Burkholderia xenovorans

    LB400.

    PLoS One8

    : e56038.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  70. De Santi C, Tedesco P, Ambrosino L, Altermark B, Willassen NP, de Pascale D. 2014. A new alkaliphilic coldactive esterase from the psychrophilic marine bacterium

    Rhodococcus

    sp. functional and structural studies and biotechnological potential.

    Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.172

    : 3054-3068.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  71. Santiago M, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, Zamora RA, Parra LP. 2016. Discovery, molecular mechanisms, and industrial applications of cold-active enzymes.

    Front. Microbiol.7

    : 1408.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  72. Nagasawa T, Mathew CD, Mauger J, Yamada H. 1988. Nitrile hydratase-catalyzed production of nicotinamide from 3-cyanopyridine in

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    J1.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.54

    : 1766-1769.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  73. Gorlatov SN, Maltseva OV, Shevchenko VI, Golovleva LA. 1989. Degradation of chlorophenols by a culture of

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    .

    Mikrobiologiya58

    : 802-806. [Microbiology 58: 647-651].

  74. Bhalla TC, Miura A, Wakamoto A, Ohba Y, Furuhashi K. 1992. Asymmetric hydrolysis of α-aminonitriles to optically active amino acids by a nitrilase of

    Rhodococcus rhodochrous

    PA-34.

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37

    : 184-190.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  75. Chung SY, Maeda M, Song E, Horikoshi K, Kudo T. 1994. Isolation and characterization of a gram-positive polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading bacterium,

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    s train TA421, from a termite ecosystem.

    Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.58

    : 2111-2113.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  76. Blakey AJ, Colby J, Williams E, O'Reilly C. 1995. Regio- and stereo-specific nitrile hydrolysis by the nitrile hydratase from

    Rhodococcus

    AJ270.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.129

    : 57-62.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  77. Masai E, Yamada A, Healy JM, Hatta T, Kimbara K, Fukuda M,

    et al

    . 1995. Characterization of biphenyl catabolic genes of gram-positive polychlorinated biphenyl degrader

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain RHA1.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61

    : 2079-2085.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  78. Hernandez BS, Koh SC, Chial M, Focht DD. 1997. Terpeneutilizing isolates and their relevance to enhanced biotransformation of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil.

    Biodegradation8

    : 153-158.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  79. Chartrain M, Jackey B, Taylor C, Sandford V, Gbewonyo K, Lister L,

    et al

    . 1998. Bioconversion of indene to

    cis

    (1

    S

    ,2

    R

    ) indandiol and trans (1

    R

    ,2

    R

    ) indandiol by

    Rhodococcus

    species.

    J. Ferment. Bioeng.86

    : 550-558.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  80. Yakimov MM, Giuliano L, Bruni V, Scarfì S, Golyshin PN. 1999. Characterization of Antarctic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria capable of producing bioemulsifiers.

    New Microbiol.22

    : 249-256.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  81. Kim D, Kim YS, Kim SK, Kim SW, Zylstra GJ, Kim YM,

    et al

    . 2002. Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation by

    Rhodococcus

    sp. strain DK17.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68

    : 3270-3278.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  82. Margesin R, Fonteyne PA, Redl B. 2005. Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by

    Rhodococcus

    spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts.

    Res. Microbiol.156

    : 68-75.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  83. Na KS, Kuroda A, Takiguchi N, Ikeda T, Ohtake H, Kato J. 2005. Isolation and characterization of benzene-tolerant

    Rhodococcus opacus

    strains.

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.99

    : 378-382.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  84. Sekine M, Tanikawa S, Omata S, Saito M, Fujisawa T, Tsukatani N,

    et al

    . 2006. Sequence analysis of three plasmids harboured in

    Rhodococcus erythropolis

    s train PR4.

    Environ. Microbiol.8

    : 334-346.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  85. Ma Y, Yu H, Pan W, Liu C, Zhang S, Shen Z. 2010. Identification of nitrile hydratase-producing

    Rhodococcus ruber

    TH and characterization of an

    amiE

    -negative mutant.

    Bioresour. Technol.101

    : 285-291.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

  86. Cai Q, Zhang B, Chen B, Zhu Z, Lin W, Cao T. 2014. Screening of biosurfactant producers from petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sources in cold marine environments.

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.86

    : 402-410.

    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?
    Which of the following microbes can degrade a variety of environmental pollutants?

Which of the following types of radiation can damage microbes?

Radiation.
Radiation in various forms, from high-energy radiation to sunlight, can be used to kill microbes or inhibit their growth. ... .
Both X-rays and gamma rays easily penetrate paper and plastic and can therefore be used to sterilize many packaged materials..

Which of the following processes refers to the decomposition of toxic pollutants by microbes?

Bioremediation can be defined as any process that uses bacteria, fungi, green plants or their enzymes to return the environment altered by contaminants to its original condition.

Which of the following environmental issue is resolved by using microorganism?

Bioremediation uses micro-organisms to reduce pollution through the biological degradation of pollutants into non-toxic substances. This can involve either aerobic or anaerobic micro-organisms that often use this breakdown as an energy source.

Which of the following microbes produces a natural biopesticide?

Bacillus sp. One of the most widely used bioinsecticides is a naturally occurring soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt. Bt produces a protein which is poisonous to insects.