When acting as a leader of a meeting how can you contribute to the meeting progress Quizlet

conflict

the disagreement and disharmony that occur in groups when members express differences regarding group goals, member ideas, behavior, and roles; or group procedures and norms

effective groups balance the conflict-cohesion dialect

highly effective groups are cohesive and also willing to engage in conflict

conflict in groups is inevitable

3 types of conflicts:
substantive
affective
procedural

substantive conflict

occurs when members disagree about issues, ideas, decisions, actions or goals

ex: should student activities fees be raised?
substantive because it focuses on the groups goal of serving students curricular needs

affective conflict

is the result of interpersonal disagreements,differences in personalities and communication styles and members conflicting core values and beliefs
-also occurs when members do not feel appreciated, feel threatened by the group or struggle for power

more difficult to resolve than substantive conflict because it involves peoples feelings and the way members relate to one another

substantive and affective conflict may occur at the same time

procedural conflict

disagreement among group members about the method or process the group uses in its attempt to accomplish a goal

procedural conflcit can arise when groups have difficulty resolving substantive or affective conflict

attribution theory

claims that we make judgements about peoples motives and characteristics that go beyond what we see and hear

one of the most significant types of attribution error is the "self-serving bias" a tendency to blame negative consequences on external forces and attribute positive consequences to our own behavior
-if your group has problems is their fault not yours, but if your group succeeds its because of the great contributions you made

constructive conflict

occurs when group members express disagreement in ways that value everyones contributions and promote the groups goal

abide by the following principles:
1.disagreement does not result in punishment
2.members work with one another to achieve a mutually satisfying resolution of conflict
3. lower-status group members are free to disagree with higher status member
4. the group has an agreed upon approach for conflcit resolution and decision making
5. members can disagree and still respect one another

constructive conflict:
-focus on issues
-respect for others
-supportiveness
-flexibility
-cooperation; seeking win-win solutions
-commitment to conflcit management

destructive conflict

results when members engage in behaviors that create hostility and prevent the group from achieving its goal. complaining, personal insults, conflict avoidance, and loud arguments or threat contribute to destructive conflict

has the potential to disable a group completely
group decision deteriorates when members are inflexible and not open to others views

destructive conflict
-focus on personalities; makes personal attacks
-disrespectful tone of voice or body language; insults
-defensivness
-inflexibility
-competition; seeking "i win" solutions
-conflict avoidance

conflict styles (5)

1. avoidance
2. accommodation
3. competition
4. compromise
5. collaboration

these styles reflect the tension between seeking personal goals and working cooperatively to achieve the groups goal

avoidance

when they are unable or unwilling to accomplish their own goals or contribute to achieving the groups goal
-uncomfortable with or unskilled at asserting themselves
-may change the subject, avoid bringing up controversial issue, and even deny that a conflict exists

-usually counterproductive because it fails to address a problem and can increase group tensions

avoiding conflict can be appropriate when:
-issue is not important to you
-you need time to collect your thoughts or control your emotions
-other members are addressing the problem effectively
-consequences of confrontation are to risky

how and when to apologize

73% of legal complainants will accept an offer when an apology is given
when no apology is given only 52% are willing to accept a settlement and avoid court

suggestions for effective apology
-take responsibility for your actions with i statements
-clearly identify the behavior that was wrong
-acknowledge how other might feel
-acknowledge that you could have acted differently
-express regret
-follow through on any promises to correct situation
-request but dont demand forgiveness

accommodation

give in to other members at the expense of their own goals
-genuine desire to get along with others
-believe that giving into others severs the needs of the group even when the group could benefit from further discussion
-may be perceived as less powerful and less influential

highly appropriate when:
-issue is important to others but not to you
-its more important to preserve group harmony than to resolve an issue
-realize you are wrong or have changed your mind
-you are unlikely to succeed in persuading the group to adopt your position

competition

occurs when group members are more concerned with their own goals that those of the group
-want to win, they argue that their ideas are superior to alternative suggestions by others

-when used inappropriately, it generates hostility, ridicule, and personal attacks against group members
-tends to divide group members into winners and losers
-this may damage the relationships among members and prevent them from achieving the common goal

may be appropriate when:
-you have strong beliefs about an issue
-group must act immediately on an issue or in an emergency
-the consequences of the groups decision may be very serious or harmful
-you believe the group may be acting unethically or illegally

compromise

is a middle ground approach to conflict in which group members give in on some goals in order to achieve other goals they want more strongly
-argue it is a fair method of resolving problems because everyone loses equally

works best when:
-other methods of resolving conflcit are not working
-the members have reached an impasse and are no longer progressing toward a reasonable solution
-the group does not have enough time to explore more creative solutions

collaboration

searchers for new solutions that will achieve both the individual goal of group members and the goals of the group
-seeks creative solutions that satisfy everyones needs and interests
-promotes synergy and resolves the dialtect tension between competition and cooperation
-involves trying to find a win win solution that enables group to make progress toward achieving its common goal

two drawbacks:
1. requires a lot of energy and the groups time
2. to be successful, all group members must participate fully

approach conflict resolution collaboratively when:
-they want a solution that everyone enjoys
-they need new and creative ideas
-they need a commitment to the final decision from every group member
-they have enough time to commit to creative problem solving

choosing a conflcit style

as situations change , so may the approach

selecting an appropriate conflict styles requires an understanding and analysis of the groups goal, member characteristics and perspectives, and the nature of the conflict situation

groups need effective strategies for analyzing and resolving conflicts

AEIOU model

focuses on collaboration and positive intentionality, the assumption that people are not trying to cause conflict

A: assume that the other person means well
E: express your feelings
I: identify what you would like to have happen
O: outcomes you expect are made clear
U: understand on a mutual basis is achieved

negotiation in groups

negotiation: is a process of bargaining in order to settle differences or solve a problem
-normally takes the form of compromise

principled negotiation: four elements characterize this process
1. people: separate the people from the problem. do not blame or accuse members. rather, find a way of working together to resolve the problem and restore balance.
2. interests: focus on interests, not positions. look for common needs and interests, not a position or specific point of disagreement. when members stake out positions they feel obligated to defend them. understanding common interests allows members to focus on solutions rather than personal success
3. opinions: generate a variety of possible solutions for mutual gain. consider multiple options before deciding what to do. be creative, flexible, and open to alternatives. make sure the groups common goal is specific, realistic, and achievable as well as clear and elevated.
4. criteria: establish fair and objective criteria for evaluating and choisng a solution or course of action.when a group seeks and adopts fair stadnards for resolving a conflict or choosing an option, they have an agreed upon basis for making decisions

-not a set of skills but a process for resolving conflict
-can become deadlocked when members fail to recognize or appreciate the needs of others and are unwilling to make concessions

during negotiation members must be wiling to cooperate with others while attempting to meet as many of their own needs as possible. they must openly communicate what they are willing to concede yet not sacrifice more than is necessary

third party intervention

occurs when a group member seeks the service of an impartial outsider who has no direct ocnnections to the group but has the skills needed to analyze the conflict and help resolve it

two kinds:
mediation and arbitration

mediation

is facilitated negotiation that employs the serves of impartial third parties only for the purpose of guiding, coaching, and encouraging the disputants through negotiation to successful resolution and agreement

-appropriate approach when group members cannot resolve the conflict by themselves and when everyone concerned is willing to participate in the process and abide by the final settlement

-effective mediation has 2 requirements:
1. impartial mediator
2. well planned mediation session

-all group members must be prepared to tell their side of the story and express the reasons they believe a given outcome
-effective mediators establish rapport with disrupting group members through empathic listening

arbitration

if mediation does not work
-involves a third party
-after considering all sides, the agreed upon arbitrator decides how to resolve the conflict
-may chose one persons solution or may develop a solution the group has not considered
-whatever the final decision, they are obligated to accept and implement the solution no matter what they think about it

conflict and member diversity

conflict becomes more complex in diverse groups

cultural response to conflict
-members from collectivist cultures that value more cooperation are less likely to express disagreement than are members from cultures that place higher value on individualism
-may be regional rather than international
-collectivist cultures place a high value on face
-face is the positive image you wish to create or preserve

gender responses to conflict
-less difference than you might think between the way women and men respond to conflict
-conflict style is not driven by biological sex
-differences in how people expect women to think and behave in conflict situations:
expected to value relationships, to be nice and supportive when they encounter conflict
-men are expected to be more assertive and focus on the task

when women use competitive conflict styles they are viewed more negatively than men
-women may compete more forcefully in reaction to what they perceived as betrayal or underhanded behavior by others

cohesion

the mutual attraction that hold the members of a group together

high cohesive group has:
-high levels of interaction
-a friendly and supportive communication climate
-a desire to conform to group expectations
-the use of creative and productive approaches to achieving goals
-satisfied members

4 general strategies for developing group cohesion

1. establish a group identity and traditions
-refer to the group by using terms such as we and our instead of i and my
2. emphasize teamwork
-group members feel responsibility for and take pride in both the work that they do and the work of other members
3. recognize and reward contributions
-establish a supportive climate in which members continually thank others for their efforts
-also may reward members contributions more formally with celebration, letter of appreciation, certificates, or gifts
4. respect group members
-when there are more strong interpersonal relationships in a group, members become more sensitive to one anothers needs

does diversity enhance or inhibit group cohesiveness

group that are homogenous develop cohesive groups more quickly than heterogeneous groups

both groups are capable of developing cohesion

groupthink

a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in group, when the members striving for unanimity over rides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action..group think refers to a deterioration of mental effeciency, reality testing, and moral judgement that results from in group pressure

3 preconditions or causes of groupthink
1. the group is highly cohesive
2. there are structural flaws
3. the situation is volatile

the homogenous and heterogenous dialect is particularly important when dealing with groupthink
-more members have in common the more cohesinve they become

8 symptoms of group think

1. invulnerability: is overly confident; willing to take big risks
2. rationalization: make excuses; discounts warnings
3. morality: ignores ethical and moral consequences
4. stereotyping outsiders: considers opposition too weak and stupid to make real trouble
5. self-censorship: doubts his or her own reservations, unwilling to disagree or dissent
6. pressure on dissent: pressures members to agree
7. illusions of unanimity: believes everyone agrees
8. mind-guarding: shields members from adverse information or opposition

preventing groupthink

-ask each member to serve in the role of critical evaluator
-if possible have more than one member work on the same problem independently
-discus group progress with someone outside the group and report feedback to group
-periodically invite an expert to join your meeting and encourage constructive criticism
- discuss potential negative consequences of any decision or action
-follow a formal decision making procedure that encourages expression of disagreement and evaluation of ideas
-ask questions, offer reasons for positions, and demand justification from others
-before finalizing decision, give members a second chance to express doubts

groupthink decisions are misguided and can result in serious harm

chapter 9

...

decision making

involves making a judgement, choosing an option, and making up your mind about something
-group decision making results in a position, opinion, judgement or action
-most groups make decisions but may not solve problems

groups often make better decisions than individuals working alone

decision making: a judgement- the group choses an alternative
-asks who, what when and where

problem solving

is a more complex process in which groups analyze a problem and develop a plan of action for solving the problem or reducing its harmful effects
-requires many decisions
-a group is better equipped to find rational and workable solutions to complex problems.
-group decision making generates more ideas and information, test and validates more arguments and produces better solutions to complex problems

a process: the group develops a plan
-asks why and how

decision making methods

a group can let majority have its way, reach a decision that everyone can live with, or leave the final decision to someone else

voting:the easiest and most obvious way to make a group decision
-no other method is more effective and decisive
-may not be the best way to make appropriate decisions

majority vote: requires that more than half the members vote in favor of a proposal

two-thirds vote: at least twice as many group members must votes for a proposal as vote against it
-ensures that a significant amount of group members support the decision

voting works best when:
-group is pressed for time
-issue is not controversial
-group is to large
-there is no other way to break a deadlock
-a groups constitution or rules require voting on certain types of decisions

consensus: decision is one that all group members have a part in shaping and that all find at least minimally acceptable as a means of accomplishing some mutual goal.
-does not mean 100% agreement
-reflects a sincere effort and willingness to make an acceptable decision that will help the group achieve its common goal
-can unite and energize a group
- works best when members have equal status or where there is a supportive climate in which everyone feels comfortable expressing their views
-al or nothing approach

authority rule: in which one person or an executive group within or outside the group makes the final decisions
-groups gather information and recommend decisions to another person or a larger group

false consensus: occurs when members reluctantly give in to group pressures or an external authority

decision making questions

questions of fact: asks whether something is true or false, whether an event did or did not happen, or whether something caused this or that

question of conjecture: asks whether something will or will not happen
-only the future holds the answer to this type of question

question of value: asks whether something is worthwhile: is it good or bad, right or wrong, moral or immoral, best, average or worst?
-difficult to discuss because the answers depend on the attitudes, beliefs and values of group members
-the answer to this question may be "it depends"

question of policy: asks whether a specific course of action should be implemented to address a problem
-what should we do about a particular problem?

in many decisions a group must address all types of questions to make a rational decision or solve a complex problem

decision making styles

rational decision maker: "ive carefully considered all the issues"
-carefully weigh info and options before making a decision
-use logical reasoning to reach and justify their conclusions

intuitive decision maker: "it just feels like the right thing to do"
-based on instincts and feelings

dependent decision maker: "if you think its okay, then ill do it"
-seeks the advice and opinion of others before making a decision
-feel uncomfortable making decisions that others may disapprove of or oppose

avoidant decision maker: "i just cant deal with this right now"
-feel uncomfortable making decisions
-may not think about a problem at all, or they delay making the final decision until last min

spontaneous decision maker: "lets do it now and worry about consequences later"
-impulsive and make quick decisions on the spur of the moment
-make decisions they later regret

structured problem solving

simple procedure such as considering and following a short agenda enhances meeting productivity

there is no best structured procedure to ensure effective problem solving in groups

two well established methods:
-the standard agenda ( reflective thinking procedures)
-singel question format (Q/A procedures)

the standard agenda ( 7 steps)

these guidelines are known as reflective thinking process
-begins with a focus on understanding the problem ans then moves to a systematic consideration of possible solutions

1. task clarification: initial phase, group makes sure that everyone understands the task or assignment
-group members ask questions about their roles and responsibilities

2. problem identification: group should word the question as an agreed upon question
-overlooking this step can send you in the wrong direction

3. fact finding: group members have several obligations reflected in the following questions of fact and value: what are the facts of the situation? what additional info or expert opinion do we need? how serious is the problem? what are the causes of the problem? what prevents us from solving the problem?

4. solution criteria: member ideas about what a solution should accomplish
-criteria should reflect a realistic understanding of solution limitations, which may include financial, political, and legal restricitons

5. solution suggestions: some solutions may be obvious at this point. group should concentrate on suggesting as many solutions as possible

6. solution evaluation and selection: may be the most difficult and controversial. members discuss the pros and cons of each suggestion in light of their agreed upon solution criteria
-questions of conjecture arise as the group considers the possible consequences of each option
-group members should remeber their solution criteria and use them to evaluate the strenghts and weaknesses of each suggested solution
-at the end of this stage a group selects one or more solutions

7. solution implementation: it may take even more time to organize and implement the solution

the single question format

approximates the way a successful problem solvers and decisions makers naturally think

5 steps
1. identify the problem: what is the single question, the answer to which is all that the group needs to know in order to accomplish its agreed upon goal?

2. create a collaborative setting: absent from most other problem solving procedures
-you ask group members to agree on a set of norms by generating a list of "we will" statements designed to foster open discussion and participation
- also identify assumptions and biases that may influence the discussion

3. analyze the issue: requires a group to identify and analyze relevant subquestions
-completing this step helps a group avoid arriving at a solution to early, before understanding the critical components of the problem
-focusing on critical thinking than describing
-opinions and disagreements may arise

4. identify the possible solutions: asks groups to suggest 2 or 3 reasonable solutions to the overall simple question and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each solutions

5. answer the single question: group selects the best solution to the problem passed on clear, shared understanding of al the relevant issues

2 features that make it different and highly effective:
1. it focuses sharply on the goal clarity and issue analysis
2. it cultivates a supportive group climate that helps members identify, raise, and resolve many interpersonal and procedural problems that can affect group success.

creativity

has 2 components
1- the nonjudgemental process of seeking, separating and connecting unrelated ideas and elements
2- combing these elements into new ideas

curiosity and creativity fuel all great groups

usually 4 stages even though it is impossible to describe the creative process in precise terms
1. investigation
2. imagination
3. incubation
4. insight

creative problem solving methods:
brainstorming for generating ideas
nominal group technique for reaching a decision
decreasing options technique for refining ideas

brainstorming

technique for generating as many ideas as possible in a short period of time
-can increase the number and creativity of responses
-more than 70% of business people use brain storming

based on 2 key principles:
1. deferring judgement improves the quality of input
2. quantity of ideas and outputs breed quality
-quantity is more important than quality

effectiveness depends on nature of group and its members

may be counter productive: may not participate if they experience a high level of apprehension, become distracted by member contents or leave it to others to come up with good ideas

when they have group members speak in turn this slows down momentum and results in fewer ideas

some member try and write down ideas, they rarely contribute

nominal group technique (NGT)

as a way of maximizing participation in problem-solving and program planning groups while minimizing some of the interpersonal problems associated with group interaction

nominal means "existing in name only"
-a nominal group is a collection of people who first work individually than collectively
-NGT combines silent voting with limited discussion to help a group build consensus and arrive at a decision.

2 separate phases:
1. an idea generating phase
-group members sit around a table in full view of one another
2. evaluation/ voting phase
-discusses each recorded idea and then votes to create a rank order of items
different than brainstorming because members work alone when generating ideas

often works better than brainstorming for generating ideas that are both numerous and creative
come up with more ideas too and have better quality

can be useful when dealing with a sensitive topic
-requires a great deal of time and a skilled moderator to make it work effectively and efficiently

decreasing options technique (DOT)

helps groups reduce and refine a large number of suggestions into a manageable number of ideas

1. generate individual ideas
-can be single words or full sentence suggestions
2. post ideas for all to see
-one idea per paper
-posted on walls
3. sort ideas
-post similar ideas nest to each other
4. prioritize ideas
-each member receives a limited number of colored sticky dots and they use their stickers to for the most important ideas or opinions

greatest advantage is that it is visual
-adding a visual component increases both efficiency and effectiveness
-works well in virtual settings

enhancing group activity

4 strategies
1. control judgement

2. encourage innovation
-inertia: we've done it before
-instruction: someone showed us how to do it
-imitation: we've seen how its done
-innovation: we've developed a new way to do it

3. ask what if questions
4. use metaphors
-make members look at a problem in new and creative ways

chapter 11

...

meeting

is a scheduled gathering of group members for a structured discussion guided by a designated chairperson

-3 elements: schedule, structure, chairperson
schedule: most are scheduled in advance for a particular time and place
structure: can be formal and highly structured or informal and loosely structured
-parliamentary is an example of a structured meeting

effective groups balance the need for both structure and spontaneity appropriate for the meetings goal and the groups norms
3rd element: chairperson
-an appointed or elected member who conducts the meeting

the success or failure of a meeting largely depends on good planning

questions about meetings

why are we meetings?
-the best way to avoid wasting time or frustrating group members is to be sure you need a meeting

who should attend the meeting?
-try to limit the meeting to fewer than 12 people
-5-7 is ideal for problem solving
-many situations the size of group is predetermined

when should we meet?
-best time to meet is between 9-11am and 1:30-3:30pm
-avoid friday afternoon meetings (energy/ enthusiasm low)
-avoid right after lunch (sluggish)
--avoid early mornings (hard to arrive on time)
-avoid near holidays or at beginning or end of the week

optimal meeting length is one hour
-if it goes longer take breaks
-if its complex schedule a serious of meetings
-schedule it when most people can meet (essential and productive members are free mainly)

where should we meet?
-the room is large enough, clean, well lit, not too hot or cold, furnished with comfy chairs
-working in an attractive meeting room can make a group feel more important and valued

what materials do we need?
-most important item to prepare and distribute prior is an agenda: outlining what topics will be discussed and in what order

the most important step in planning a meeting is defining its goal as clearly as possible
-not the same as its subject
subject=topic of discussion
goal=identifies the desired outcome

information giving meeting

provides the chairperson or a member the opportunity to present important information to everyone else

information getting meeting

provides an opportunity for members to provide reports or briefings to the chairperson and other members

instructional meeting

provides members with training in a specific skill or knowledge area

problem solving meeting

provides an opportunity for all members to participate in solving a problem and or making a decision

types of locations for a meeting

leaders office: convenient, access to materials and resources, enhances the meetings importance
-members may feel like guests rather than equals
-subject to distractions

members office: convenient, access to materials and resources, boots the members status
-subject to distractions
-may be in a cubicle with cramped seating

on-site meeting room: avoids distractions of a working office, more spacious and comfortable than an office
-subject to interruptions
-distant from materials and resources
-may be time limit on use

off-site meeting room: eliminates most distractions, provides neutral territory, more attractive and comfortable
-costly
-distant from materials and resources

agenda

an outline of items discussed at a meeting
-organizational tool
-helps group members focus on a progression of tasks
-provides a sense of continuity for a group
-failure to plan and prepare a agenda denies a chairperson and a group one of the most powerful tools in meeting management
-chairperson is responsible for preparing and distributing an agenda in advance

elements of an agenda

purpose of the meeting: a clear statement of the meetings objective and topic for discussion helps members prepare

names of group members: a list of all particpants lets members know who will be attending

date, time, and place: the agenda clearly indicates date, time, duration and location

call to order: chairperson officially begins the meeting

approval of the agenda: this gives members an opportunity to correct or modify the agenda

approval of the minutes: the minutes of the pervious meeting are reviewed, revised if need be, and approved by the group as an accurate representation of last meeting

reports: officers, individuals, or subcommittees report on the progress of the activities

unfinished business: lists topics that require on going discussion or issues that the group was unable to resolve during the last meeting

new business:new discussion items are outlined and discussed in this section

announcements: any items of info that the group needs to know but that do not require any discussion are announced

adjournment: chairperson officially dismisses the particpants and ends meeting

preparing agenda

determine the order of items
-begin the meeting with simple business items and easy to discuss topics
-reserve important and difficult items for the middle portion of the meeting
-use last third of the meeting for easy discussion items that do not require difficult decisions

meeting think

why group members often fail to think critically in meetings and as a result make faulty decisions

3 contributing reasons for this
1. deceitful leadership: the leader falsely claims it will involve members in the decision making process

2. infor overload: too much info burdens the group and prevents members from concentrating on or understanding the issues of the meeting

3. poorly run meetings: there may be no agenda to guide the group
-may be too long
-leader may be doing all the talking

chairing the meeting

in addition to conducting the meeting, you may also create the agenda, schedule the meeting, distribute the minutes, and follow up or implement decisions after the meeting is over

prior to meeting: notify group members and check all plan on attending send reminder

during: balance strength and sensitivity
-take attendance make sure recorder includes results in mins
-first priority is facilitating group discussion

end: summarize and identify items that still need to be taken care of

one key characteristic of a successful meeting is productivity or at least progress
-90% of attendees admit to daydreaming
-73% brought other work
-39% have fallen asleep

well planned meeting, clear agenda, and skilled chairperson

prerecs for a productive meeting

dealing with disruptive behavior

nonparticipants: members who never or rarely contribute
-do not put apprehensive or introverted members on the spot by forcing them to contribute
-provide opportunities for reluctant members to become involved in the discussion
-respond positively to their input to demonstrate that you see the value in their ideas

-you don't need full participation from all members all the time, goal is a balanced group discussion over the course of a meeting

texters: may believe they are not being disruptive but if they are preoccupied with checking and responding to their messages they are not listening effectively and are not fully engaged in the meeting
-groups can establish ground rules at the beginning of a meeting
-after meeting chairperson talks to those who broke rules

loudmouths: when a member talks so much that no one gets a chance to speak
-first allow them to state their mind and acknowledge that you understand their positions
-may be necessary to interrupt them
-remind them of the importance of getting input from everyone
-even assign them to minutes to shift focus to writing and listening and not talking

interrupters: not trying to be rude, their impatience and excitement cause them to speak out while other members are still talking
-interrupt them
and invite the other person to finish speaking
-more assertive option is to intervene and say let them finish

whisperers: carries on confidential convos with others during a meeting
-directing eye contact can make them stop
-or ask them to share their ideas with the group

latecomers and early leavers:
-chairperson should start meeting on time
-do not waste time by summarizing business for them
-let them sit without participating until they have observed enough to contribute to discussion
-talk to them after meeting about the importance of attending the entire meeting

when you confront disruptive members be sensitive and focus on the behavior rather than making it personal attacks
-describe behavior and suggest alternative behaviors
-indicate the consequences if the behavior continues

adapting

adapting to the diversity of group members involves understanding and accommodating differences while pursuing shared goals

minutes

are the written record of a groups discussion and actions during a meeting
-provides a way to communicate with those that didn't come
-help prevent disagreement over what was decided in a pervious meeting and what tasks individuals members agreed to do
-chairperson is responsible for the accuracy and distribution of the mins

not word for word
take right after meeting
then give them to chairperson

name of group
date and place
names of those who came
name of chairperson
names of those absent
time meeting came to order
time it ended
name of person taking mins
summary
specific action item

recorder

or secretary that takes minutes at every meetings, or members take turns
-chairperson is responsible for checking editing and distributing copies to all group members

action item

a task assigned to individual members for completion after the meeting

persons name
assignment
deadline

parliamentary procedure

set of formula rules used to determine the will of the majority through fair and orderly discussion and debate
-only official group members may participate and vote
-there are rules governing the number of members needed to hold a meeting as well as the responsibilities of key players
players needed to help run a meeting: chairperson, a clerk, and sometimes an official parliamentary

majority rule: accepts the will of the majority
-in critical or controversial issues decisions require two-third vote

minority rights: group protects the rights of all the members by guaranteeing everyone the right to speak
-majority prevails

balanced discussion: rights of all members to speak

orderly progress: group follows an approved agenda that promotes orderly business while also allowing flexibility to make decisions

evaluating the meeting

before adjourning may distribute a post meeting reaction form: a questionnaire designed to asses the success of a meeting by collecting written reactions from particpants
-prepare it before meeting, distribute at end collect before they leave

should ask questions about the discussion, quantity of group interactions and effectiveness of meeting procedures

chaos theory

claims that although certain behaviors in natural systems are not predictable, there is a pattern to their randomness
-emerges over time
-can never predict what will exactly happen in a meeting

complexity theory

goes even further than a search for patterns, it examines three characteristics of complex systems:
order, complexity, chaos

contrasts them to different stats of water- ice liquid and steam

order is like ice-frozen and solid
chaos is like steam-constant motion and insubstantial
complexity is like liquid-fluid and relatively controllable

Which of the following is one of the ways to effectively lead and improve meeting productivity?

Tips for leading a meeting.
Set goals before the meeting..
Create an agenda..
Invite the right people..
Present the agenda and goals..
Take notes..
Give your full attention..
Get other people involved..
Shut down other devices..

What are the leadership skills needed to conduct a productive meeting?

Goals, Gathering, Problem Solving, Decision Making, Action Plan & Monitoring. What are the leadership skills needed to conduct a productive meeting? C. Listening Attentively, Responding Constructively, Soliciting All Ideas, and Matching Decision Making to the Situation.

How can you help a large audience with diverse interests be more understanding and accepting of your message?

How can you help a large audience with diverse interests be more understanding and accepting of your message? put the negative information in a favorable context. avoid placing blame and focus on the solution.

How can you be sure you are providing the right information to your audience in the right format?

If you're not sure which content formats will resonate with your audience, then use the following tips to identify them:.
Pinpoint your audience. You can't captivate an audience without understanding it first. ... .
Set goals for your content. ... .
Align content formats with your goals. ... .
Determine what you want to convey..