the Modified Mercalli Scale
the elastic rebound theory
the principle of superposition
the travel time difference
epicenter
dip
slip
focus
dip
epicenter
focus
strike
P waves ... S waves .... Surface waves
Surface waves ... P waves .... S waves
P waves ... Surface waves ... S waves
S waves ... P waves .... Surface waves
back and forth parallel to the direction of wave travel
back and forth perpendicular to the direction of wave travel
in a rolling circular motion
the particles do not move
the 1906 San Francisco earthquake
the 1964 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake
the 1755 Lisbon, Portugal earthquake
the 1985 Mexico CIty earthquake
1
2
3
4
normal
reverse
thrust
all of these
25%
50%
75%
90%
normal
reverse
transform
all of these could occur
about 5 to 10 times per year
about once a year
about every 5 to 10 years
about every 50 to 100 years
the resistance to flow of a
liquid
the resistance to change in color
the resistance to change in volume
the resistance to change in shape
the resistance to flow of a liquid
the resistance to change in shape
the resistance to change in volume of a liquid
the resistance to change in volume of a solid
stay the
same
increase
decrease
stay the same
increase
decrease to 0.0
decrease
stay the same
increase
decrease to 0.0
decrease
mantle ... outer core
lithosphere ... asthenosphere
crust
... mantle
none of these
P waves only
S waves only
P and S waves
Surface waves
increases
decreases
stays constant
none of the above
A is 10X more
intense than B
A is 1000 more intense than B
Richter magnitude does not measure intensity
B is 0.01X as intense than A
P waves
S waves
Surface waves
Q waves
directly below the epicenter
directly above the epicenter
in the P wave shadow zone
in the S wave shadow zone
dip
epicenter
focus
scarp
dip
epicenter
focus
scarp
epicenter
fault scarp
seismic wave
dip of the earthquake
normal
reverse
thrust
abnormal
variations in air pressure
ground vibrations
tsunami waves
electromagnetic pulses
A
B
C
They are all surface waves
A
B
C
They are all P waves
A
B
C
They are all S waves
A and C
A and B
None of the above
back and forth parallel to the direction of wave travel
perpendicular to the direction of wave travel
in a rolling elliptical motion
in a rolling circular
motion
back and forth parallel to the direction of wave travel
perpendicular to the direction of wave travel
in a rolling elliptical motion
in a rolling circular motion
Charles Richter
Edward Sheridan
James Hutton
Art Smith
the area of the fault break
the rigidity of the fault
the slip on the fault
the type of faulting
Richter scale
Modified Mercalli scale
the Centigrade scale
the moment magnitude scale
convergent plate boundaries
divergent plate
boundaries
transform plate boundaries
all of these
normal faulting
reverse faulting
strike-slip faulting
all of these
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by normal faulting
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by strike-slip faulting
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by thrust faulting
deep-focus earthquakes caused by thrust faulting
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by normal faulting
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by strike-slip faulting
shallow-focus earthquakes caused by thrust faulting
deep-focus earthquakes caused by thrust faulting
New Madrid, Missouri,
1812
San Francisco, 1906
Anchorage, Alaska, 1964
Loma Prieta, California, 1989
tsunami
intense ground shaking
a landslide
all of these
undersea earthquakes
undersea landslides
the eruption of an oceanic volcano
all of these
P waves
S waves
Surface waves
tsunami
Most earthquakes occur at plate boundaries
The time and location of most major earthquakes can be predicted several days in advance
Earthquakes can be caused by normal, reverse and strike-slip faulting
P waves travel faster than both S waves and Surface waves
An increase in the frequency of smaller earthquakes in
the region
rapid tilting of the ground
rapid changes in water levels in wells
all of these
scientists can accurately predict the time and location of almost all earthquakes
scientists can accurately predict the time and location of about 50% of all earthquakes
scientists can accurately predict when an earthquake will occur, but not where
scientists can characterize the
seismic risk of an area, but can not yet accurately predict most earthquakes