Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news. Show
The first volley in what is expected to be a fierce war over Texas redistricting kicked off Wednesday in the form of a federal lawsuit filed by two Democratic state senators who argue that state lawmakers cannot legally redraw the state’s legislative maps this fall. State Sens. Roland Gutierrez of San Antonio and Sarah Eckhardt of Austin are asking a federal district court in Austin to take over the work of drawing up new political maps for the Texas House and Senate to reflect the state’s growth in the last decade. Joined in their lawsuit by the Tejano Democrats, a political organization, the senators argue the Legislature cannot constitutionally carry out that work in a special legislative session. The Texas Constitution states the Legislature “shall” redraw the state’s legislative maps “at its first regular session after the publication” of each decennial census. But significant holdups in finalizing the 2020 census delayed the release of the detailed population numbers needed to redraw those districts for several months — far past the end of the regular legislative session in May. Having a court redraw legislative maps could help Democratic chances for a more favorable map compared with what the Legislature’s Republican majority might draw up in a bid to hold power for the next decade in a state that is demographically moving away from the party. Congressional and state House and Senate districts need to be reconfigured before the 2022 elections to account for the state’s explosive growth in the last 10 years. The census’ August data delivery showed people of color accounted for 95% of the state’s population growth of nearly 4 million residents since 2010. The suit does not challenge the Legislature’s ability to draw a new Congressional district map in special session. Lawmakers must rework that map to add the two additional districts Texas earned because of its fast growth. Because the Legislature lacks the authority to redraw the legislative districts now, the lawsuit argues, that obligation falls to the court to ensure the maps won’t violate the 14th Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle for the 2022 elections. The Legislature’s next regular legislative session won’t take place until January 2023. State legislative districts are meant to be close to equal in population, but the state’s booming — and uneven — growth in the last decade means that population counts in the districts are significantly out of balance. Lawmakers are beginning their work on the state’s new maps this month, with a series of committee hearings set for next week. Gov. Greg Abbott, who is named as the lead defendant in the lawsuit, is expected to call them back for a third special session to sign off on redrawn maps. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The redistricting fight was expected to move into the federal courts regardless. The politically fraught exercise has regularly developed into legal fights over lawmakers’ treatment of voters of color. Decade after decade, the state has faced allegations — and subsequent federal court rulings — that lawmakers discriminated against those voters, intentionally working to undermine the power of their votes, in drawing up political maps. During the last round of redistricting after the 2010 census, federal courts found that Texas lawmakers discriminated against Hispanic and Black voters in particular. The Legislature’s Republican majority was reprimanded by federal judges, as recently as 2017 in protracted litigation, for intentionally diluting the power of Black and Hispanic votes; the Legislature’s maps after the 2010 census flunked both the U.S. Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act and were redrawn amid litigation in federal court. “For nearly 20 years Texas Republicans have manipulated the redistricting process to disenfranchise minority voters and Democrats to maintain a tenuous hold on the state legislature, but that all ends now,” Eckhardt said in a statement. “We will continue to demand that they start following both the intent and the letter of the law. Party’s over.” Join us Sept. 20-25 at the 2021 Texas Tribune Festival. Tickets are on sale now for this multi-day celebration of big, bold ideas about politics, public policy and the day’s news, curated by The Texas Tribune’s award-winning journalists. Learn more.
In 1998, Alaska voters approved Ballot Measure 3, a Constitutional Amendment which fundamentally re-wrote the redistricting process in Alaska. To provide some distance from elected officials who may be directly impacted by revised district boundaries, the new constitutional language delegated line-drawing authority to an independent Redistricting Board, whose members were prohibited from seeking legislative office in the election following adoption of a new redistricting plan. Note: In earlier decades, redistricting was commonly referred to as "reapportionment". The two terms are often interchangeably used although "reapportionment" technically means the assignment of United States House Representative counts among the 50 states. Since Alaska only has a single U.S. House Representative, Alaska focuses on "redistricting" which is the assignment of specific legislative seats to defined geographic areas. A dozen other states have seen the wisdom in this approach and many more are considering a similar method of redistricting for future decades. Alaska Constitutional ProvisionsArticle VI enacts the redistricting process in Alaska and spells out the creation and operations of the Redistricting Board. § 1. House Districts – Members of the house of representatives shall be elected by the qualified voters of the respective house districts. The boundaries of the house districts shall be set under this article following the official reporting of each decennial census of the United States.§ 2. Senate Districts – Members of the senate shall be elected by the qualified voters of the respective senate districts. The boundaries of the senate districts shall be set under this article following the official reporting of each decennial census of the United States.§ 3. Reapportionment of House and Senate – The Redistricting Board shall reapportion the house of representatives and the senate immediately following the official reporting of each decennial census of the United States. Reapportionment shall be based upon the population within each house and senate district as reported by the official decennial census of the United States.§ 4. Method of Redistricting – The Redistricting Board shall establish forty house districts, with each house district to elect one member of the house of representatives. The board shall establish twenty senate districts, each composed of two house districts, with each senate district to elect one senator.§ 5. Combining Districts – Repealed by 1998 Ballot Measure No. 3§ 6. District Boundaries – The Redistricting Board shall establish the size and area of house districts, subject to the limitations of this article. Each house district shall be formed of contiguous and compact territory containing as nearly as practicable a relatively integrated socio-economic area. Each shall contain a population as near as practicable to the quotient obtained by dividing the population of the state by forty. Each senate district shall be composed as near as practicable of two contiguous house districts. Consideration may be given to local government boundaries. Drainage and other geographic features shall be used in describing boundaries wherever possible.§ 7. Modification of Senate Districts – Repealed by 1998 Ballot Measure No. 3§ 8. Redistricting Board – |
The legislative Redistricting Board has the authority to draw new districts if
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 ketiadaan Inc.
