Show
BackgroundThe methodological opposition between the categorical approach and the dimensional approach appears as the main issue for the reorganization of current psychiatric knowledge. After a period exclusively marked by the categorical approach, the dimensional method comes back today complementarily with spectral models, anticipating the development of the future DSM V, scheduled for 2013. MethodologyIn this abstract, we browse the interaction between these two approaches in the construction of our nosographic from Pinel and Kraepelin to nowadays spectral classifications. Both approaches are compared in an epistemological way, with its pros and cons. ResultsHistorical perspective shows how psychiatry begins with categorical classification, which is later replace by dimension taxonomy, since second decade of XX century. Most symptoms are dimensional in nature, and can be transformed into a category by setting a cutoff point. Now, after excessive classification and clinical reductionism applied since DSM III, dimensional approach is emerging to propose a more sensible description about mental disorders. Dimensional approach advantages are a certain facility to explore interpersonal differences without artificial cut-offs, and clinical flexibility. A principal disadvantage is the multiplicity of proposed dimensions, without consensus between different theories. In the other hand, categorical method is familiar to us, and is based on solid clinical empirical data. By the way, clinicians say “the more they know their patients, the more they find it difficult to insert them into a category”, the map is not the territory. ConclusionBoth approaches must coexist, being each one complementary to each order.
References (0)Cited by (0)Recommended articles (6)Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Related
What is the difference between categorical and dimensional approach?A categorical approach to assessment relies on diagnostic criteria to determine the presence or absence of disruptive or other abnormal behaviors (e.g., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM-IV, APA, 2000), whereas a dimensional approach places such behaviors on a continuum of frequency and/or ...
What is a dimensional approach to classification?The dimensional approach, which allows a clinician more latitude to assess the severity of a condition and does not imply a concrete threshold between “normality” and a disorder, is now incorporated via select diagnoses. Its inclusion will also provide more utility in research contexts.
What is one of the differences between a dimensional approach to assessing personality disorders as opposed to a categorical approach quizlet?(c) The categorical approach relies on subjective measurements, while the dimensional approach relies on objective measurements.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a dimensional instead of a categorical approach?Dimensional approach advantages are a certain facility to explore interpersonal differences without artificial cut-offs, and clinical flexibility. A principal disadvantage is the multiplicity of proposed dimensions, without consensus between different theories.
|