In competitive markets businesses need to embrace two sets of capabilities that are often seen as complete opposites – they have to be fast & creative, while also being productive & scale driven. This article explores how businesses can become truly ambidextrous, providing an outline model that helps to create the right balance within the organization.
Today’s competitive and highly volatile environment calls for a new kind of flexibility and adaptability. At the same time standardization, efficiency and scale must continue to dominate the CxO agenda in order to deliver against margin and profit expectations. Top executives face the challenge of delivering against both requirements, yet conventional organizational wisdom provides little guidance on how to resolve this trade-off in day-to-day operations. The concept of the ambidextrous organization offers new, tangible and balanced answers to this most pressing management dilemma. Based on insight from our global experience, and in-depth discussions with organizational development leaders, we have created an ambidextrous organization development canvas that helps management answer three simple questions:
The most obvious and tangible benefit of this organizational canvas is that it enables management teams to discuss organization development issues in a common language and make decisions on development aims and organization transformation priorities.Figure 1: Ambidextrous as a new paradigm of organizational success
Amazon is a prime example of the new breed of ambidextrous organizations. Always searching for the most innovative business ideas, it strives to deliver on customers’ needs before people realize that they require them. This approach is driven by a well-established culture of invention, curiosity and bias for action. Complementing its creative side, Amazon has also proven itself to be a champion of productivity. Not only its logistics, but also its internal processes for scaling new business models, are tailored for pure efficiency and standardization. If a new approach proves to be successful, it is rolled out rapidly, formally established, monitored and aligned to deliver full productivity. By successfully balancing these two dimensions, Amazon has built a sustainable competitive advantage that has become accepted best practice across multiple industries.
Now, not every company can or wants to follow Amazon’s development path, and should not necessarily do so. The art is more in finding actionable organizational answers that specifically address the company’s own business context, taking into account its history, development path, future challenges and strategic targets.
View all insights
3 min read •
Ambidextrous organizations – How to embrace disruption and create organizational advantage
New answers to the top organizational and management challenges in the age of disruption
Insight: Organizational detoxing
ORGANIZATIONAL DETOXING TO ANSWER COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS The momentum of change is accelerating and is transforming markets, ecosystems, and organizations. Whether you call it VUCA (volatile, uncertain…
Find out more
Ambidextrous Organizations – Build sustainable organizational advantage
Today’s competitive and highly volatile environment calls for a new kind of flexibility that is not covered by conventional organizational wisdom. Corporate strategies specifically address…
Find out more
ARTHUR D. LITTLE APPOINTS ANGELA DUM AS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR TO LEAD PROCUREMENT INNOVATION
Frankfurt, July 18, 2022 Global Management Consultancy Arthur D. Little (ADL) has appointed Angela Dum as Associate Director to globally lead Procurement Innovation at ADL, focusing on industrial…
What are the four key attributes of strategic management?
1) It is directed toward overall organizational goals and objectives; 2) It includes multiple stakeholders in decision making; 3) It requires incorporating both short-term and long-term perspectives; 4) It involves the recognition of trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency.
What is the hierarchy of organizational goals from the least specific to the most specific?
Leaders should emerge at which level(s) of an organization? The hierarchy of organizational goals is in this order (least specific to most specific): A) vision statements, strategic objectives, mission statements.
Which of the following is not an area for firms to focus on according to the Drucker Institute study on large publicly traded companies from 2012 to 2017?
According to the Drucker Institute study of 693 large, publicly traded companies from 2012 to 2017, crisis management not a key area of performance for firms to focus on.