According to studies conducted on Job Corps results over four years, researchers found

About the Study

In 2017, the Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) partnered with the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) and funded contractor Mathematica Policy Research to conduct the National Job Corps Study: 20-Year Follow-Up Study Using Tax Data. This administrative data analysis aims to assess the long-term employment and earnings outcomes for Job Corps participants in the 1990s using tax data through 2015. The sample is from the original National Job Corps Study where random assignment intake was conducted between 1994 and early 1996 to a program and control group.

Administered by the ETA, Job Corps is the nation’s largest residential education and job training program for at-risk youth. The program reaches an estimated 60,000 participants each year at numerous locations across the country.

This Department of Labor-funded study was a result of the annual process to determine the Department’s research priorities for the upcoming year. It contributes to the labor evidence-base to inform employment and training programs and policies and addresses Departmental strategic goals and priorities.

Download the summary

Job Corps: A Primer
August 3, 2022
Job Corps is a comprehensive and primarily residential federal job training program for youth
ages 16 to 24 who are low-income and have a barrier to education and employment. The program
Adam K. Edgerton
is authorized under Subtitle C, Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA,
Analyst in Education Policy
P.L. 113-128). Job Corps operates through more than 100 centers located across the 50 states,

Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia.

Following a sharp reduction and proposed phase-out of the program in FY1985, Job Corps
appropriations have steadily increased but have not kept pace with inflation, with the exception of a temporary increase via
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5) in response to the 2007-2009 recession.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) awards two-year contracts to Job Corps center operators, with five for-profit
corporations receiving the majority of the contracts awarded. To emphasize the educational mission of Job Corps, operators
may choose to refer to their centers as campuses.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service operates more than 20% of the centers as Job Corps Civil Conservation
Centers (CCCs), which are located on federal lands, in order to offer training in forestry and other conservation-related
careers. The national Director of Job Corps oversees six regional offices that supervise and support individual centers, and
the national office establishes enrollment goals and supports the recruitment of eligible applicants through a nationwide
marketing campaign.
Each center must provide a program of education that focuses on career and technical education and training that leads to
employment. Required services include initial assessment of skill levels; job search, placement assistance, and career
counseling; and the provision of workforce and labor market employment statistics information, including job vacancies and
information on prerequisite job skills and local occupations that are in demand. Job Corps participants receive assessment and
counseling at regular intervals to assist with employment placement prior to graduating and for up to one year after
graduation.
While enrolled, participants are eligible to receive a biweekly living allowance as well as basic medical, dental, and mental
health services. Each center’s program may also include English language acquisition, work-based learning, recreational
activities, physical rehabilitation and development, driver’s education, and/or counseling, which may include financial
literacy.
Operators must report on the primary indicators of performance as described in WIOA, including the credentials earned by
Job Corps participants, their job placements, and their average wages. In most cases, DOL may not renew a contract if a
center ranks among the lowest 10% of centers nationwide for two years and fails to achieve an average of 50% or higher in
the expected levels of performance. Each center must also implement strict standards of conduct, including a zero tolerance
policy covering multiple areas and mandatory drug testing of all enrollees. At least 80% of a center’s participants must reside
onsite.
Overall, the structure of Job Corps has remained relatively unchanged since the program was first created by the Economic
Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964. The Secretary of Labor has the authority to create demonstration projects to experiment
with different models of delivering Job Corps services in a manner that improves outcomes and reduces cost. The largest
demonstration project, Job Corps Scholars, provides funding directly to community colleges, historically Black colleges and
universities, and tribally controlled colleges and universities to offer Job Corps-eligible students career and technical
education instruction, intensive personal and academic counseling, and employment placement services. The Job Corps
Scholars program has awarded $31 million to 26 grantees in 15 states.
The National Job Corps Study, authorized in 1993 by DOL, remains the most rigorous evidence of Job Corps’ effectiveness.
This randomized control trial found several short-term benefits of the program, as participants earned GEDs and vocational
certificates, and saw immediate wage increases. However, the study found that the wage increases did not persist over time,
except for participants who enrolled at age 20 or older. For these older students, wages continued to be higher than those of
nonparticipants even 20 years after graduation.
Congressional Research Service


link to page 4 link to page 4 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 15 link to page 15 link to page 16 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 16 Job Corps: A Primer

Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Appropriations ................................................................................................................................. 1
Job Corps Operations ...................................................................................................................... 3
Participant Eligibility ................................................................................................................ 3
Recruitment ............................................................................................................................... 4
Services Provided at Centers ..................................................................................................... 5
Center Safety and Standards of Conduct................................................................................... 6
Awarding of Center Contracts ................................................................................................... 7
Demonstration Projects ............................................................................................................. 7
Job Corps Scholars .............................................................................................................. 8
Accountability ................................................................................................................................. 8
Primary Indicators of Performance ........................................................................................... 8
Evidence of Effectiveness ............................................................................................................. 10
Findings from the National Job Corps Study .......................................................................... 10
Re-analysis and Follow-Up Studies ......................................................................................... 11
History of Job Corps ....................................................................................................................... 11
Origins in the War on Poverty .................................................................................................. 11
Periods of Contraction and Expansion .................................................................................... 12
COVID-19 Impacts ................................................................................................................. 12
Legislation ............................................................................................................................... 13

Figures
Figure 1. Appropriations for Job Corps ........................................................................................... 2
Figure 2. Inflation-Adjusted Appropriations for Job Corps in 2021 Dollars ................................... 2

Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 13

Congressional Research Service


link to page 5 link to page 5 Job Corps: A Primer

Introduction
Job Corps provides job training and academic programming for individuals ages 16 to 24 who are
low-income and have a barrier to employment, such as not having earned a high school diploma.
Unlike most other federal workforce training programs, Job Corps is primarily residential. The
stated purpose of Job Corps is to
(A) assist eligible youth to connect to the labor force by providing them with intensive
social, academic, career and technical education[1], and service-learning opportunities, in
primarily residential centers, in order for such youth to obtain secondary school diplomas
or recognized postsecondary credentials leading to—
(i) successful careers, in in-demand industry sectors or occupations or the Armed Forces,
that will result in economic self-sufficiency and opportunities for advancement; or
(ii) enrollment in postsecondary education, including an apprenticeship program; and
(B) support responsible citizenship.2
Job Corps has trained and educated more than 2 million individuals since it was created by the
Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964, though its recent enrollment was severely impacted
by the COVID-19 pandemic as residential centers closed and gradually reopened. It is
administered by the Employment and Training Administration’s (ETA’s) Office of Job Corps in
the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). Job Corps is currently authorized under Subtitle C, Title I
of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA; P.L. 113-128), as amended by the
Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (P.L. 115-224).
This report begins with a description of Job Corps appropriations and operations, including how
contracts are awarded, students are recruited, and operators deliver services. It then focuses on
accountability measures as well as evidence of Job Corps’ effectiveness. The report concludes
with a discussion of the history of the program since its inception.
Appropriations
FY1985 marked a low point in Job Corps appropriations levels as the Reagan Administration
proposed a phase-out of the program. Since that time, Job Corps appropriations have steadily
increased, although these increases have not kept pace with inflation (as shown in Figure 1and
Figure 2). In FY2009, Job Corps received a temporary boost in appropriations during the Great
Recession, as national unemployment reached 10%.3

1 For more information on career and technical education (CTE), see CRS Report R47166, Career and Technical
Education: A Primer.
2 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA, P.L. 113-128), §141.
3 See U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2012/recession/pdf/recession_bls_spotlight.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

1


Job Corps: A Primer

Figure 1. Appropriations for Job Corps

Source: Prepared by CRS. Data from FY1984 through FY2013 are provided by DOL at https://www.dol.gov/
sites/dolgov/files/ETA/budget/pdfs/tepbah.pdf. Data for FY2013 through FY2021 are found in the FY2023 DOL
Congressional Budget Justification for the Job Corps program, p. 12, at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/
general/budget/2023/CBJ-2023-V1-04.pdf.
Figure 2. Inflation-Adjusted Appropriations for Job Corps in 2021 Dollars

Source: Prepared by CRS. Data from FY1984 through FY2021 are provided by DOL at https://www.dol.gov/
sites/dolgov/files/ETA/budget/pdfs/tepbah.pdf. Data for FY2013 through FY2021 are found in the FY2023 DOL
Congressional Budget Justification for the Job Corps program, p. 12, at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/
general/budget/2023/CBJ-2023-V1-04.pdf.
Notes: Inflation adjustments relied on the nonseasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U), with FY2021 as the base year (accessed March 28, 2022, at https://www.bls.gov/data/
home.htm).
Congressional Research Service

2


Job Corps: A Primer

Job Corps Operations
Job Corps is unique among federal youth workforce development programs because of its
residential model and its contracting of all services through centers located across 50 states,
Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. More than 100 individual centers report to one of the
six regional offices headquartered in Boston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Dallas, Chicago, and San
Francisco. These regional offices report to the national office and the national Director of Job
Corps.
Job Corps students typically live at a center4 while they learn skills in specific training areas for a
maximum of two years. Individuals with disabilities may remain enrolled for an additional year
(for a total of three years), and individuals who participate in national service may be granted an
enrollment extension.5
Participants can earn a GED, a high school diploma, and/or postsecondary credits while receiving
meals, health care, a living allowance, and child care. Prior to exiting Job Corps, participants
receive transitional support services, such as help finding employment, housing, child care, and
transportation. Job Corps activities are intended to help enrollees “(A) secure and maintain
meaningful unsubsidized employment; (B) enroll in and complete secondary education or
postsecondary education or training programs, including other suitable career and technical
education and training, and apprenticeships programs; or (C) satisfy Armed Forces
requirements.”6
All Job Corps centers must adhere to the requirements of the Policy and Requirements Handbook
(PRH).7 Each center must also submit its own operating plan for approval by the Secretary of
Labor (the Secretary).8
Participant Eligibility9
At each center, Admissions Counselors (ACs) are responsible for determining whether an
applicant is eligible. All applicants must be
 a U.S. citizen; a lawfully admitted permanent resident alien, refugee, asylee, or
parolee, or other alien who has been authorized to work in the United States; or a
resident of a U.S. territory;
 between the ages of 16 and 24;

4 At least 80% of a center’s students must reside onsite. The House-passed version of the latest WIOA reauthorization
would codify the word “campus” instead of “center.” See CRS Report R47099, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act of 2022 (H.R. 7309).
5 As authorized by a Civilian Conservation Center program, WIOA, §146(b)(3).
6 WIOA, §148. For more information on allowances, allotments, and transition payments, see the PRH,
https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Enrollment%20Services/1.1%20Outreach%20and%20Recruitment/Exhibits/Exhibit%206-
2%20Student%20Allowance%20and%20Allotment%20System.pdf.
7 An interactive version of the PRH is available at https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Pages/Home.aspx.
8 WIOA, §151.
9 See WIOA, §144. For detailed procedures on verifying eligibility requirements, see Exhibit 1-1 of the PRH,
https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Enrollment%20Services/1.2%20Eligibility/Program%20Requirements/Exhibit%201-
1%20Job%20Corps%20Eligibility%20Requirements.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

3


Job Corps: A Primer

 low income, meaning that the applicant meets one or more of the following
criteria:
 is on public assistance,10
 has income below the poverty level,
 is experiencing homelessness,11
 is eligible for free or reduced price lunch, or
 is a foster child;
 has a barrier to education and employment, meaning that the applicant meets one
or more of the following criteria:
 is basic skills deficient12;
 did not graduate from high school;
 is homeless13;
 is a runaway, in foster care, or has aged out of foster care;
 is a parent;
 requires additional education; or
 is a victim of severe forms of trafficking in persons.14
Recruitment15
The Secretary prescribes specific standards for the recruitment, screening, and selection of
eligible applicants. These standards reflect the Secretary’s consideration of recommendations
from governors, local boards, and other interested parties.16 Centers must provide ACs and One-
Stop Career Centers17 or American Job Centers with current information about all aspects of
center life, as well as offer tours to prospective applicants, parents, school counselors, employers,

10 Eligible programs include the supplemental nutrition assistance programs established under the Food and Nutrition
Act of 2008, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) established under Title IV of the Social Security Act,
and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program established under Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
11 As defined in Section 41403(6) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. §14043e-2(6)). A homeless
child or youth is defined in Section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. §11434a(2)).
12 This is defined in Section 3 of WIOA as a youth who “has English reading, writing, or computing skills at or below
the 8th grade level on a generally accepted standardized test” or a youth or adult who “is unable to compute or solve
problems, or read, write, or speak English, at a level necessary to function on the job, in the individual’s family, or in
society.”
13 As defined in Section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. §11434a(2)).
14 As defined in Section 103 of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. §7102).
15 See WIOA, §145.
16 See Chapter 1.4 of the PRH, https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Enrollment%20Services/1.4%20Enrollee%20Selection/Pages/
default.aspx. Recent congressional proposals to streamline recruitment for Job Corps include developing a joint
application for Job Corps, YouthBuild, and other youth workforce investment activities. See CRS Report R47099,
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2022 (H.R. 7309).
17 For more information, see CRS Report R44252, The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and the One-Stop
Delivery System.
Congressional Research Service

4


Job Corps: A Primer

and others whenever possible.18 The Secretary is also authorized to contract out recruitment,
screening, and selection of eligible applicants.19
During FY2020, a national marketing campaign based primarily on digital platforms yielded
more than 280,000 prospective applicants. Of these, 44,000 applied, which generated more than
20,000 new enrollees.20 These nationwide marketing investments totaled $3.7 million, which was
about $13 to generate each prospective applicant. In addition to national efforts, each center can
conduct its own marketing and advertising as part of its approved budget.
Services Provided at Centers
Job Corps centers are to provide enrollees with “an intensive, well organized, and fully
supervised program of education, including English language acquisition programs, career and
technical education and training, work experience, work-based learning, recreational activities,
physical rehabilitation and development, driver’s education, and counseling, which may include
information about financial literacy.”21 For example, the Potomac Job Corps Center in
Washington, DC, provides training in 12 careers including building construction technology,
plumbing, and culinary arts, with facilities that can house up to 378 participants.22
Centers must provide certain services initially, such as orientation to the one-stop delivery
system, coupled with an assessment of skill levels (including literacy, numeracy, and English
language proficiency), aptitudes, and supportive service needs.23
Participants then must receive
 labor exchange services, including job search, placement assistance, and career
counseling;
 referrals to and coordination of activities with other programs and services;
 workforce and labor market employment statistics information, including job
vacancies and information on prerequisite job skills and local occupations that
are in demand; and
 performance information and program cost information on eligible providers of
training services.24
Job Corps participants are to receive assessment and counseling at regular intervals to assist with
employment placement prior to graduation.25 Job Corps centers may provide personal allowances

18 For more information, see Chapter 1.1. of the PRH, https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Enrollment%20Services/
1.1%20Outreach%20and%20Recruitment/Pages/default.aspx.
19 WIOA, §145.
20 FY2022 Congressional Budget Justification for the Job Corps program, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/
general/budget/2022/CBJ-2022-V1-04.pdf.
21 WIOA, §148.
22 For more information, see https://www.jobcorps.gov/center/potomac-job-corps-center.
23 WIOA, §134(c)(2)(A).
24 Services provided are described in additional detail in WIOA, §134(c)(2)(A). Eligible providers are described in
Section 122 of WIOA and include institutions of higher education, apprenticeship program providers, or other public or
private providers of training services, which may include joint labor-management organizations, and eligible providers
of adult education and literacy activities when combined with occupational skills training.
25 WIOA, §149.
Congressional Research Service

5


Job Corps: A Primer

for enrollees, transition allowances for graduates, and up to three months of employment services
for former enrollees.26
Center Safety and Standards of Conduct
Center operators are required to establish and comply with agreements with law enforcement and
submit Center Safety and Security Standard Operating Procedures to the national office.27 In
2017, Congress held hearings to address the issue of student safety at Job Corps centers in the
wake of two homicides that occurred at centers in 2015.28
To address concerns around the underreporting of significant incidents, Congress asked the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) to analyze incident and participant survey data. GAO
analyzed incident data covering the period from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016, and found
nearly 50,000 safety and security incidents during a period when approximately 539,000 students
were served. In addition, survey data analysis covered the period from March 2007 through
March 2017, during which an average of 72% of participants reported feeling safe.
As residential programs, Job Corps centers maintain strict standards of conduct with a multitier
disciplinary system.29 Under a mandatory zero tolerance (ZT) policy, drug testing must be
administered to new enrollees, with results available within 45 days. A positive result leads to
automatic expulsion. The ZT policy, under which an enrollee is automatically dismissed, covers
acts of violence; use, sale, or possession of a controlled substance; abuse of alcohol; and other
illegal or disruptive activity, using guidelines established by the Secretary.30
Centers must also submit Significant Incident Reports (SIRs) to the national and regional offices
in the event of any of the following:
a. Death or work/training-related hospitalization of one or more active students or on-duty
staff in one incident, work training related amputations, and work/training related losses of
an eye
b. Serious illness, or serious injury (e.g., epidemic, hospitalization, emergency room
treatment requiring hospital admission or surgery, reaction to medication/immunization)
to an active student and/or on-duty staff member
c. Physical assault
d. Inappropriate sexual behavior
e. Indication that a student is a danger to himself/herself or others
f. Incident requiring law-enforcement involvement

26 WIOA, §150.
27 For more information, see Chapter 5.3 of the PRH, https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Management%20Services/
5.3%20Safety%20and%20Security/Pages/default.aspx.
28 See Joe Davidson, “Job Corps Program Hit on Student Safety Problems, Despite Successes,” The Washington Post,
July 17, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/07/17/job-corps-program-hit-on-student-
safety-problems-despite-successes/. A full transcript of the hearing is available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/CHRG-115hhrg25922/html/CHRG-115hhrg25922.htm.
29 Exhibit 2-1 of the PRH lists actions to be taken in response to specific incidents and whether a Significant Incident
Report (SIR) is required, https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Management%20Services/5.3%20Safety%20and%20Security/
Associated%20Reporting%20Requirements/Exhibit%202-
1%20Infraction%20Levels%20Definitions%20and%20Appropriate%20Center%20Actions.pdf.
30 WIOA, §152.
Congressional Research Service

6


Job Corps: A Primer

g. Incident involving illegal activity
h. Arrest of current student or on-duty staff member
i. Motor vehicle accident involving injuries, or damage to a center vehicle
j. Theft or damage to center, staff, or student property
k. Incident threatening to close down the center or disrupt the center’s operation
l. Incident involving a missing minor student31
Initial SIRs must be submitted within 24 hours of all incidents—with the exception of the death
of an active student or on-duty staff member, for which centers have six hours to submit an SIR.
Centers must then take corrective action and continue to submit supplemental reports until the
incident has been resolved.
Awarding of Center Contracts32
The federal government does not directly operate Job Corps centers. Instead, the Secretary
awards contracts for the operation of Job Corps centers for a maximum of two years. Job Corps
operators may be a “Federal, State, or local agency, an area career and technical education school,
a residential career and technical education school, or a private organization.”33 In practice, five
private, for-profit contractors operate the majority of centers. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Forest Service operates roughly 20% of centers as Job Corps Civil Conservation
Centers (CCCs), which are located on federal lands in order to offer training in forestry and other
conservation-related careers. The remaining operators are a mix of for-profit and nonprofit
organizations.34
Recent congressional proposals have sought to improve diversity among the types of Job Corps
operators,35 and DOL has encouraged more nonprofit organizations to apply for Job Corps
contracts.36
Demonstration Projects37
The Secretary has demonstration project authority. The primary goal of recent demonstration
projects has been to enhance student outcomes and cost effectiveness by providing services
outside of traditional Job Corps centers or through different types of operators, such as
institutions of higher education and state governmental agencies.

31 Chapter 5.4 of the PRH, https://prh.jobcorps.gov/Management%20Services/5.4%20Significant%20Incidents/Pages/
default.aspx.
32 See WIOA, §147.
33 WIOA, §147.
34 The exact percentages of operator types change slightly from year to year as centers open and close. For more
information, see Mathematica Policy Research, The External Review of Job Corps: An Evidence Scan Report,
Washington, DC, 2018. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/legacy/files/JC-EvidenceScan.pdf.
35 For more information, see CRS Report R47099, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2022 (H.R. 7309).
36 FY2023 Congressional Budget Justification for the Job Corps program, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/
general/budget/2023/CBJ-2023-V1-04.pdf.
37 Section 156(a) of WIOA allows the Secretary to “carry out experimental, research, or demonstration projects relating
to carrying out the Job Corps program.”
Congressional Research Service

7


Job Corps: A Primer

The most recent demonstration projects began in FY2019. DOL awarded demonstration projects
to the Louisiana National Guard38 and the State of Idaho39 in order to provide Job Corps services
at a lower cost than traditional Job Corps centers, and to examine whether student outcomes
would improve as a result.
Job Corps Scholars
A larger demonstration project, Job Corps Scholars, was announced in FY2019 and is subject to
an independent evaluation that is expected to conclude in FY2024.40 Rather than contract with
centers as part of the traditional model, DOL awarded Job Corps Scholars funds directly to
community colleges, historically Black colleges and universities, and tribally controlled colleges
and universities. These institutions then provided Job Corps-eligible students with educational
and career and technical education (CTE) instruction, intensive personal and academic
counseling, and employment placement services. The Job Corps Scholars program awarded $31
million to 26 grantees in 15 states.41
Accountability
DOL ranks Job Corps centers in terms of their effectiveness according to several metrics.42 These
performance metrics are distinct from any SIRs that may be reported to the regional or national
office as part of a violation of the standards of conduct or the ZT policy.
Primary Indicators of Performance43
Job Corps operates under accountability requirements that are similar to other youth workforce
development programs authorized by WIOA. The primary indicators of performance are
 the percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment
during the second quarter after exit from the program;
 the percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment
during the fourth quarter after exit from the program;
 the median earnings of program participants who are in unsubsidized
employment during the second quarter after exit from the program;
 the percentage of program applicants who obtain a recognized postsecondary
credential, or a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent, during
participation in or within one year after exit from the program44;

38 This is known as “the Job ChalleNGe project,” which is delivered through a repurposed Job Corps center designed to
serve 200 participants annually in two cohorts of 100 cadets; see https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/
eta20190610.
39 This program is a unique partnership between the Idaho Department of Labor and the College of Western Idaho. For
more information, see https://cwi.edu/news/news-room/cwis-partnership-idaho-job-corps-helps-students-thrive.
40 For more information, see https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasp/evaluation/currentstudies/job-corps-evidence-building-
portfolio.
41 For more information and a list of grantees, see https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/jobcorps/job-corps-scholars.
42 Centers are regularly ranked, with public reports available at https://www.jobcorps.gov/job-corps-reports.
43 See WIOA, §116.
44 Program participants who obtain a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent are included in this
percentage only if in addition to obtaining such diploma or its recognized equivalent they have obtained or retained
Congressional Research Service

8


Job Corps: A Primer

 the percentage of program participants who, during a program year, are in an
education or training program that leads to a recognized postsecondary credential
or employment and who are achieving measurable skill gains toward such a
credential or employment; and
 the indicators of effectiveness in serving employers (ESE measures), such as
retention with the same employer (the percentage of participants who exit and are
employed with the same employer in the second and fourth quarters after exit).45
Job Corps centers are considered to be high performing under these metrics as long as they meet
100% or higher of their expected levels of performance.46 The Secretary establishes the expected
levels using a statistical model to adjust the national goal (upward or downward) for each center.
The model accounts for the abilities of the students enrolled and the characteristics of the
environment in which a center operates using local economic data.47 High performing operators
have an advantage in the competitive selection process for contracts.48
In addition to the expected levels of performance for a Job Corps center as established by the
Secretary, contractors also report information that includes the following:49
 the number of enrollees served;
 demographic information on the enrollees served, including age, race, gender,
and education and income level;
 the number of graduates of a Job Corps center;
 the number of graduates who entered the Armed Forces;
 the number of graduates who entered apprenticeship programs;
 the number of graduates who received a regular secondary school diploma or
GED;

employment or are in an education or training program leading to a recognized postsecondary credential within one
year after exit from the program.
45 Additional ESE measures can be found at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/
Measures%20of%20Effectiveness%20in%20Serving%20Employers_Final%20Report_12-31-20.pdf. These indicators
are established by the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education in consultation with representatives of states
and political subdivisions, business and industry, employees, eligible providers of activities carried out through the core
programs, educators, researchers, participants, the lead state agency officials with responsibility for the programs
carried out through the core programs, individuals with expertise in serving individuals with barriers to employment,
and other interested parties.
46 For the reporting period from July 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022, 17 centers qualified as high performing with
overall ratings of 100% or above, see https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jobcorps.gov/2022-05/
rcrr_02282022_PY.pdf. The highest-performing center during this period was the Mingo Job Corps Civilian
Conservation Center in Puxico, MO, with a 114.4% rating. The Frenchburg Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center in
Frenchburg, KY, and the Ramey Job Corps Center in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, were the second and third highest-
performing centers, respectively. Centers ranked 18 through 116 achieved lower than a 100% overall rating. The lowest
performing center was the Cascades Job Corps Center in Sedro Wooley, WA, with an overall rating of 64.5%.
47 For more information on the performance management system and levels of performance, see https://s3-us-west-
2.amazonaws.com/jobcorps.gov/2017-04/Job_Corps-jc_performance_management_system_overview_guide.pdf.
48 WIOA, §147.
49 Unlike the expected levels of performance, this information is not used to determine whether a center must develop
and implement a performance improvement plan, as described in WIOA, §159(f)(2).
Congressional Research Service

9


Job Corps: A Primer

 the numbers of graduates who entered unsubsidized employment related to the
CTE and training received through Job Corps, and the number who entered
unsubsidized employment unrelated to the CTE and training received;
 the percentage and number of former enrollees, including those dismissed under
the ZT policy;
 the percentage and number of graduates who enter postsecondary education;
 the average wages of graduates on the first day of unsubsidized employment and
six months later;
 the percentage of enrollees as compared to enrollment targets as established by
the Secretary;
 the cost per enrollee50;
 the cost per graduate51; and
 any additional information required by the Secretary.52
Job Corps’ outcome measurement system further disaggregates these performance indicators by
type of training program, such as training to become an automobile technician, medical assistant,
or corrections officer. In addition to performance goals for individual centers, training programs
have their own separate goals for completion rates and average wages.53
Evidence of Effectiveness
Relatively little rigorous evidence exists concerning the effectiveness of Job Corps aside from the
National Job Corps Study, during which researchers conducted a randomized control trial to
determine whether Job Corps participants achieved better outcomes than those who did not enroll.
Findings from the National Job Corps Study54
Drawing upon a nationally representative sample, National Job Corps Study researchers randomly
assigned nearly 81,000 eligible program applicants between late 1994 and early 1996 to either a
treatment group, whose members were allowed to enroll in Job Corps, or a control group, whose
6,000 members were not allowed to enroll. The study used survey data from participants four
years after random assignment as well as earnings data covering the nine years following random
assignment.
In the treatment group, 93% of the members enrolled in an education or training program during
the first 48 months, and the group saw a 21% increase in GED certificates earned and a 31%
increase in vocational certificates earned compared to the control group. The treatment group saw

50 This is calculated by comparing the number of enrollees at the center in a program year to the total budget for such
center in the same program year.
51 This is calculated by comparing the number of graduates of the center in a program year compared to the total budget
for such center in the same program year.
52 WIOA, §159.
53 For a full list of types of center training programs, see the regularly updated Job Corps report page at
https://www.jobcorps.gov/job-corps-reports, or https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jobcorps.gov/2022-05/
rveo_02282022_PY.pdf for an example from the reporting period 7/1/2021 to 2/28/2022.
54 Peter Schochet, John Burghardt, and Sheena McConnell, “Does Job Corps Work? Impact Findings from the National
Job Corps Study,” American Economic Review, vol. 98, no. 5 (2008), pp. 1864-1886.
Congressional Research Service

10


Job Corps: A Primer

an increase of 2.2% in high school diplomas earned—perhaps because they earned a GED
instead—and most of those who returned to high school did not graduate. Job Corps participation
had no effect on college attendance or completion compared to the control group, suggesting that
participants did not pursue additional education after earning vocational certificates.
As for earnings, three years after random assignment, Job Corps participants earned $1,150 more
annually than those in the control group.55 These earnings increases did not persist nine years
later, except for those participants who began the program at age 20 or older. The study provides
evidence that Job Corps may be more effective for these older participants.
Re-analysis and Follow-Up Studies
A re-analysis of the National Job Corps Study focused on the amount of time that enrollees spent
receiving Job Corps training rather than on whether participants enrolled at all. The authors
revealed that wages continued to increase for Job Corps participants the longer they remained in
training. Participants who spent at least 40 weeks in training saw an increase of $1,612 annually
two years after random assignment, which was $462 more than the average impact for all
participants.56
Another follow-up study reproduced earlier results after examining participants’ tax records 20
years after random assignment. The authors found that the same older students (those who began
at age 20 or older) continued to benefit from the program in terms of their earnings, while
younger students still did not see wage increases compared to the control group.57 One recent
proposal in the 117th Congress, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2022 (H.R.
7309), would eliminate the requirement that only 20% of Job Corps enrollees may be 22 years or
older, perhaps related to these findings.58
History of Job Corps59
This section provides a brief history of Job Corps, including its origins and major shifts in its
appropriations over time.
Origins in the War on Poverty
Job Corps was created by the Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964, a legislative
cornerstone of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty, to tackle the problem of youth
unemployment. The inspiration for Job Corps came from the Civilian Conservative Corps (CCC),
a 1933 work relief program that gave millions of young men employment on environmental
projects as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal.

55 This estimate includes zero earnings for nonworkers.
56 Carlos A. Flores, Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, Arturo Gonzalez, and Todd C. Neumann, “Estimating the Effects of
Length of Exposure to Instruction in a Training Program: The Case of Job Corps,” Review of Economics and Statistics,
vol. 94, no. 1 (2012), pp. 153-171.
57 Peter Schochet, National Job Corps Study: 20-Year Follow-Up Study Using Tax Data, Mathematica Policy Research,
2018, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/legacy/files/Job-Corps-IRS-Report.pdf.
58 For more information, see CRS Report R47099, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2022 (H.R. 7309).
59 Much of the material for this section comes from Joseph E. Blackett, A Legal History of the Job Corps, dissertation,
Andrews University, 2002, https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1231&context=
dissertations.
Congressional Research Service

11


Job Corps: A Primer

Whereas the CCC focused on training adults, Job Corps focused on training youth in order to
better prepare individuals ages 16 to 24 for adulthood. The residential component of Job Corps
remains one of its signature components compared to other federal youth workforce development
programs.60
Following the passage of EOA and an initial appropriation of $280 million, the first Job Corps
center opened on January 15, 1965, at Camp Catoctin in Maryland, with 14 staff members
providing services to 30 students at a site adjacent to the presidential retreat at Camp David. The
first Job Corps Women’s Center was established a few months later in Cleveland, OH.
Previous CCC centers and retired military bases provided many of the first Job Corps sites
throughout the country. As the program expanded and costs increased, some students were
allowed to commute beginning in 1967, but the majority of participants continued to live onsite,
as do most current participants.
Periods of Contraction and Expansion
In 1969, shortly after the inception of Job Corps, the incoming Nixon Administration instructed
the Director of Job Corps to begin phasing out the program. By the end of the Nixon
Administration, Job Corps was serving a reduced number of students with a budget of $151
million.
Under the Carter Administration, Job Corps’ budget increased more than threefold to $560
million (albeit during a period of high inflation), with 99 centers serving more than 40,000
students nationwide. A 1979 report from the Comptroller General described ongoing debates
about the program, some of which continue today. For example, the report questioned whether
youths should be removed from their home environments, and whether all graduates were earning
above-poverty wages.
Although concerns about cost effectiveness and cost overruns have recurred at various periods
during the history of Job Corps, appropriations have remained fairly stable and have not
significantly declined since FY1985. At the end of the Reagan Administration, Job Corps
appropriations were at $716 million—$156 million more than under the Carter Administration.
As discussed in an earlier section, the program has received either gradual increases or level
funding in terms of nominal dollars from the 1990s to the present, and its operations have
remained relatively stable.61 However, funding levels have declined some in terms of constant
dollars since the mid-1990s.
COVID-19 Impacts
The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted Job Corps operations, resulting in a dramatic
reduction in students served during FY2020 and FY2021. Students vacated Job Corps centers
beginning in March 2020, and distance learning began in May 2020. Enrollment dropped by 56%,
and the number of students completing trade training dropped to zero by April 2021. The average

60 For a comprehensive list of such programs, see CRS In Focus IF11952, Youth Employment and Training Programs
Authorized by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.
61 Congress investigated some funding gaps and center closures in 2015. For more information, see CRS Report
R43611, Recent Developments in the Job Corps Program: Frequently Asked Questions.
Congressional Research Service

12


Job Corps: A Primer

time students took to finish the program more than doubled, from 8 to 18 months.62 Most students
began to return to centers during the first quarter of FY2021.63
Legislation
Since the passage of EOA in 1964, the authorization for Job Corps has existed in the following
statutes:
 the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1972 (CETA);
 the Job Training Partnerships Act of 1982 (JTPA);
 the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA); and
 the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 (WIOA; P.L. 113-128)
(the most recent authorization), as amended by the Strengthening Career and
Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (P.L. 115-224).64
CETA, JTPA, and WIA each served as the primary federal workforce development law until
repealed by its successor. The core components of Job Corps have remained largely the same over
time even as the program has expanded and evolved to serve a greater proportion of older
students and more female students.65

Author Information

Adam K. Edgerton

Analyst in Education Policy

Acknowledgments
CRS Research Assistant Paul Romero created Figure 1 and Figure 2.

62 U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General–Office of Audit, COVID-19: Safety and Remote Learning
Challenges Continue for Job Corps, 2021, https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21109064-jobcorpsoigreport.
63 FY2023 Congressional Budget Justification for the Job Corps program, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/
general/budget/2023/CBJ-2023-V1-04.pdf.
64 For more information, see CRS Report R44252, The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and the One-Stop
Delivery System; and CRS In Focus IF11952, Youth Employment and Training Programs Authorized by the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act.
65 Elena Silva, “Job Corps,” Encyclopedia Britannica, December 31, 2019, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Job-
Corps.
Congressional Research Service

13


Job Corps: A Primer


Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47208 · VERSION 1 · NEW
14


Which of the following is the recent 2001 initiative to work toward an effective national educational policy in the USA?

No Child Left Behind (NCLB), in full No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, U.S. federal law aimed at improving public primary and secondary schools, and thus student performance, via increased accountability for schools, school districts, and states.

Which statement most accurately represents the relationship between American schools and adolescent work group of answer choices?

Which statement most accurately represents the relationship between American schools and adolescent work? Widespread employment among adolescents makes it difficult for schools to require more academic work from them.

Which statement best illustrates the beliefs of a person who favors tracking students?

Which statement best illustrates the beliefs of a person who favors tracking students? It is the best way to ensure students are matched to their schoolwork.

Which statement best represents the relationship between low and high achievers?

Which statement best represents the relationship between low- and high-achievers? High-achievers tend to have a positive effect on their low-achieving friends.