Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the neutrality acts favor britain over germany?

Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the neutrality acts favor britian over germany?

The 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany because Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany.

Question

Asked 2/24/2016 8:10:25 PM

Updated 8/8/2019 7:18:29 AM

1 Answer/Comment

Rating

8

The 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany because Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany.

Added 8/8/2019 7:18:29 AM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $34.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

Repeal of the Neutrality Act

The American Journal of International Law

Vol. 36, No. 1 (Jan., 1942)

, pp. 8-23 (16 pages)

Published By: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.2307/2192188

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2192188

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$34.00 - Download now and later

Journal Information

AJIL is a leading peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly since 1907. It features articles, editorials, notes, comments, and book reviews by pre-eminent scholars and practitioners from around the world addressing developments in public and private international law. The Journal also contains analyses of decisions by national and international courts and tribunals as well as a section on contemporary U.S. practice in international law. AJIL is indispensable for all professionals working in international law, economics, trade, and foreign affairs.

Publisher Information

Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The American Journal of International Law © 1942 Cambridge University Press
Request Permissions

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

journal article

Cash and Carry Neutrality

Foreign Affairs

Vol. 18, No. 2 (Jan., 1940)

, pp. 179-195 (17 pages)

Published By: Council on Foreign Relations

https://doi.org/10.2307/20028990

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20028990

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Journal Information

Since 1922, the Council has published Foreign Affairs, America's most influential publication on international affairs and foreign policy. It is more than a magazine — it is the international forum of choice for the most important new ideas, analysis, and debate on the most significant issues in the world. Inevitably, articles published in Foreign Affairs shape the political dialogue for months and years to come. With America more engaged in the world than ever, Foreign Affairs is performing an especially valuable service for its readers. Educators helping teach tomorrow's leaders and thinkers can also benefit from Foreign Affairs through its website, books and academic resources including our customized textbook program, Among Nations at www.AmongNations.com.

Publisher Information

Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. The Council sponsors several hundred meetings each year, provides up-to-date information and analysis on its website (CFR.org), and publishes Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal in the field, as well as dozens of other reports and books by noted experts.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Foreign Affairs © 1940 Council on Foreign Relations
Request Permissions

Why did the 1939 cash and carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts for Britain over Germany?

Roosevelt arranged the inclusion of the "cash and carry" clause "...as a deliberate way to assist Great Britain and France in any war against the Axis Powers, since he realized that they were the only countries that had both the hard currency and ships to make use of "cash-and-carry." The clause was set to expire after ...

Why did the 1939 cash and carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany Ⓒ Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany?

Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany? Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany. How did the Destroyers for Bases agreement President Roosevelt signed help Britain and its allies? The agreement put US bases on British territory.

What was the effect of the Neutrality Act of 1939?

After a fierce debate in Congress, in November of 1939, a final Neutrality Act passed. This Act lifted the arms embargo and put all trade with belligerent nations under the terms of “cash-and-carry.” The ban on loans remained in effect, and American ships were barred from transporting goods to belligerent ports.

Which action led to the initial amendment of the Neutrality Act of 1939 by the US Congress?

Initially, this proposal failed, but after Germany invaded Poland in September, Congress passed the Neutrality Act of 1939 ending the munitions embargo on a "cash and carry" basis. The passage of the 1939 Neutrality Act marked the beginning of a congressional shift away from isolationism.