Carol M. Highsmith, photographer. East corridor, Great Hall. Ceiling mosaic representing Law and naming Americans distinguished in law: Shaw, Taney, Marshall, Story, Gibson,
Pinckney, Kent, Hamilton, Webster, Curtis. Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C. 2007. Carol M. Highsmith Collection. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. The Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress preserves, arranges, and makes available for research the personal papers and organizational records of historical significance that have been acquired by the Library. This guide highlights the Manuscript Division's collections of federal lower court judges of the United States circuit courts of appeal and federal district courts (non-Supreme Court collections, e.g. non-SCOTUS). Show Federal Court OverviewAlthough the Supreme Court has the greatest authority in the federal court system, the circuit courts and district courts play a vital role in federal law. The United States courts of appeals consist of thirteen appellate courts that rank below the Supreme Court. A court of appeals hears lawsuits from the district courts in its circuit and decisions appealed from federal administrative agencies. There are ninety-four federal judicial districts that are organized into twelve regional circuits. Each circuit has a court of appeals. The thirteenth court is the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which hears specialized cases pertaining to patent law and decisions made by the Court of International Trade and the Court of Federal Claims. While court of appeals cases are decided by panels of judges, the U.S. district courts are trial courts that have a presiding judge and a jury who decides a case. District courts hear both civil and criminal matters. Decisions adjudicated by appellate and district courts often reach the Supreme Court. The papers of judges of these lower courts provide researchers with greater context regarding the legal issues that have shaped not only judicial history, but the larger nation. Many of the collections feature bench books, dockets, diaries, case files, and correspondence related to various legal proceedings that reach federal courts. Beyond Legal HistoryBecause judges often worked in other capacities during their lifetime, several collections touch upon metropolitan histories in areas such as the regions of the Mid-Atlantic and the South. Also represented are files pertaining to judicial conferences, which provide insight into circuit policy and legal procedures. These papers are valuable because they provide a window into legal, urban, and cultural history along with insights into the burgeoning prison industrial systems sometimes referred to by historians as the carceral state. SCOTUSDue to their time on federal courts prior to their appointment to the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), the papers of several SCOTUS justices appear in the guide as well, however these entries focus on their pre-SCOTUS service particularly in regard to their work as a judge. Researchers interested in the SCOTUS portion of their career, should consult with reference staff in the reading room and the specialist responsible for overseeing the Manuscript Division's legal collections. Arrangement of CollectionsThe guide is arranged by type of court and therein alphabetically by the name of judge. Each entry contains an overview of a collection and highlights its strengths and unique features. Each entry includes links to catalog records for an individual collection. On each catalog record, find more information about the collection. Many of these collections have a finding aid linked from the record. The finding aid provides a description of the content and arrangement of the collection. Information about Searching Finding Aids is available on the Search Tips page of this guide. A few collections in this guide list access restrictions. Many of them, however, are available for research and include restrictions for only a small part of the collection. Collections not available online are accessible in the Manuscript Reading Room. Arizona has two appellate courts: The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court, and the Supreme Court is the court of last resort. Court of Appeals The Court of Appeals: • Hears and decides cases in three-judge panels. Court of Appeals, Division One, has statewide responsibility for appeals from the Industrial Commission, unemployment compensation rulings of the Department of Economic Security, and rulings by the Tax Court. The appeals process is generally the same for both civil and criminal cases. There are filing fees in civil cases, but not for criminal cases. Court Personnel Court of Appeals Judge Qualifications • At least 30 years old; The Supreme Court The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction, meaning that the court may refuse to review the findings of the lower court. The Supreme Court automatically reviews every case in which a defendant has been sentenced to death.
Supreme Court Justices The Supreme Court: • May choose to review a
Court of Appeals decision when a party (the plaintiff or the defendant in the original case) files a petition for review. The Court’s Role in the Impeachment Process The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over Senate impeachment trials, but renders no decision as to the guilt or innocence of the public official on trial. The Arizona House of Representatives, by a majority vote, initiates formal charges for an impeachable offense. Conviction for the impeachable offense requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate. If convicted, a public officer is removed from office. The Supreme Court’s role in the impeachment process is set out in Article VIII, Part 2, § 1 of the Arizona Constitution. Court Personnel Supreme Court Justice Qualifications • Must be admitted to the practice of law in Arizona and be an Arizona resident for the ten years immediately before taking office; What is one of the major roles appellate courts play in the federal judiciary quizlet?The appellate court's primary function is to review the trial court's decision for "errors in law," not issues involving determination of facts. The party making the appeal is the appellant and the party opposing the appeal is called the appellee.
What is one of the major roles district courts play in the federal judiciary?Within limits set by Congress and the Constitution, the district courts have jurisdiction to hear nearly all categories of federal cases, including both civil and criminal matters. Every day hundreds of people across the nation are selected for jury duty and help decide some of these cases.
What is the role of the federal courts quizlet?The role of the federal judiciary is to: execute and implement the laws of Congress. enforce and undertake ordinance law. interpret and apply the laws of the nation.
|