SAS No. 36 Engagements to Review Financial Statements Show
StatusIssued by Auditing Standards Committee in Taiwan on 21 November, 2001. SummaryThe objective of a review of financial statements is to enable an auditor to state whether, on the basis of procedures which do not provide all the evidence that would be required in an audit, anything has come to the auditor’s attention that causes the auditor to believe that the financial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles. A review engagement provides a moderate level of assurance that the information subject to review is free of material misstatement, this is expressed in the form of negative assurance. The auditor should plan and perform the review with an attitude of professional skepticism recognizing that circumstances may exist which cause the financial statements to be materially misstated. For the purpose of expressing negative assurance in the review report, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence primarily through inquiry and analytical procedures to be able to draw conclusions. In planning a review of financial statements, the auditor should obtain or update the knowledge of the business including consideration of the entity’s organization, accounting systems, operating characteristics and the nature of its assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. When using work performed by another auditor or an expert, the auditor should be satisfied that such work is adequate for the purposes of the review. The auditor should document matters which are important in providing evidence to support the review report, and evidence that the review was carried out in accordance with this Statement. Procedures for the review of financial statements will ordinarily include the following:
The review report should contain a clear written expression of negative assurance. The auditor should review and assess the conclusions drawn from the evidence obtained as the basis for the expression of negative assurance. Based on the work performed, the auditor should assess whether any information obtained during the review indicates that the financial statements are not presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles. Effective dateThis Statement is effective from 31 December, 2001. The following auditing standard is not the current version and does not reflect any amendments effective on or after December 31, 2016. The current version of the auditing standards can be found here. Audit PlanningEffective Date: For audits of fiscal years beginning on or after Dec. 15, 2010Final Rule: PCAOB Release No. 2010-004Summary Table of Contents
Introduction1. This standard establishes requirements regarding planning an audit. Objective2. The objective of the auditor is to plan the auditso that the audit is conducted effectively. Responsibility of the Engagement Partner for Planning3. The engagement partner1/ is responsible for the engagement and its performance. Accordingly, the engagement partner is responsible for planning the audit and may seek assistance from appropriate engagement team members in fulfilling this responsibility. Engagement team members who assist the engagement partner with audit planning also should comply with the relevant requirements in this standard. Planning an Audit4. The auditor should properly plan the audit. This standard describes the auditor's responsibilities for properly planning the audit.2/ 5. Planning the audit includes establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan, which includes, in particular, planned risk assessment procedures and planned responses to the risks of material misstatement. Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit but, rather, a continual and iterative process that might begin shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit and continues until the completion of the current audit. Preliminary Engagement Activities6. The auditor should perform the following activities at the beginning of the audit:
Planning Activities7. The nature and extent of planning activities that are necessary depend on the size and complexity of the company, the auditor's previous experience with the company, and changes in circumstances that occur during the audit. When developing the audit strategy and audit plan, as discussed in paragraphs 8-10, the auditor should evaluate whether the following matters are important to the company's financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and, if so, how they will affect the auditor's procedures:
Audit Strategy8. The auditor should establish an overall audit strategy that sets the scope, timing, and direction of the audit and guides the development of the audit plan. 9. In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor should take into account:
Audit Plan10. The auditor should develop and document an audit plan that includes a description of:
Multi-location Engagements11. In an audit of the financial statements of a company with operations in multiple locations or business units,13/ the auditor should determine the extent to which audit procedures should be performed at selected locations or business units to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. This includes determining the locations or business units at which to perform audit procedures, as well as the nature, timing, and extent of the procedures to be performed at those individual locations or business units. The auditor should assess the risks of material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements associated with the location or business unit and correlate the amount of audit attention devoted to the location or business unit with the degree of risk of material misstatement associated with that location or business unit. 12. Factors that are relevant to the assessment of the risks of material misstatement associated with a particular location or business unit and the determination of the necessary audit procedures include: [The following subparagraph a. is effective for audits of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2014. See PCAOB Release No. 2014-002. For audits of fiscal years beginning before December 15, 2014, click here.]
13. In determining the locations or business units at which to perform audit procedures, the auditor may take into account relevant activities performed by internal audit, as described in AU sec. 322, The Auditor's Consideration of the Internal Audit Function in an Audit of Financial Statements, or others, as described in Auditing Standard No. 5. AU sec. 322 and Auditing Standard No. 5 establish requirements regarding using the work of internal audit and others, respectively. 14. AU sec. 543, Part of Audit Performed by Other Independent Auditors, describes the auditor's responsibilities regarding using the work and reports of other independent auditors who audit the financial statements of one or more of the locations or business units that are included in the consolidated financial statements.18/ In those situations, the auditor should perform the procedures in paragraphs 11-13 of this standard to determine the locations or business units at which audit procedures should be performed. Changes During the Course of the Audit15. The auditor should modify the overall audit strategy and the audit plan as necessary if circumstances change significantly during the course of the audit, including changes due to a revised assessment of the risks of material misstatement or the discovery of a previously unidentified risk of material misstatement. Persons with Specialized Skill or Knowledge16. The auditor should determine whether specialized skill or knowledge is needed to perform appropriate risk assessments, plan or perform audit procedures, or evaluate audit results. 17. If a person with specialized skill or knowledge employed or engaged by the auditor participates in the audit, the auditor should have sufficient knowledge of the subject matter to be addressed by such a person to enable the auditor to:
Additional Considerations in Initial Audits18. The auditor should undertake the following activities before starting an initial audit:
19. The purpose and objective of planning the audit are the same for an initial audit or a recurring audit engagement. However, for an initial audit, the auditor should determine the additional planning activities necessary to establish an appropriate audit strategy and audit plan, including determining the audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the opening balances.19/ Why is it important for the auditor to obtain sufficient level of knowledge of the entity's business?The auditor should obtain sufficient knowledge of the entity's risk assessment process to understand how management considers risks relevant to financial reporting objectives and decides about actions to address those risks.
How does the auditor collect sufficient appropriate audit evidence?Audit procedures to obtain audit evidence can include inspection, observation, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance and analytical procedures, often in some combination, in addition to inquiry.
How does an auditor gain such knowledge?An auditor acquires specific knowledge about a certain industry through training and experiences with clients from this industry.
What is sufficient information in auditing?Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of audit evidence. The quantity of audit evidence needed is affected by the following: Risk of material misstatement (in the audit of financial statements) or the risk associated with the control (in the audit of internal control over financial reporting).
|